Retention of Gadolinium in Brain Parenchyma: Pathways for Speciation, Access, and Distribution. A Critical Review.

The unexpected appearance of T1 hyperintensities, mostly in the dentate nucleus and the globus pallidus, during nonenhanced MRI was reported in 2014. This effect is associated with prior repeated administrations of gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agents (GBCAs) in patients with a functional blood-brain barrier (BBB). It is widely assumed that GBCAs do not cross the intact BBB, but the observation of these hypersignals raises questions regarding this assumption. This review critically discusses the mechanisms of Gd accumulation in the brain with regard to access pathways, Gd species, tissue distribution, and subcellular location. We propose the hypothesis that there is early access of Gd species to cerebrospinal fluid, followed by passive diffusion into the brain parenchyma close to the cerebral ventricles. When accessing areas rich in endogenous metals or phosphorus, the less kinetically stable GBCAs would dissociate, and Gd would bind to endogenous macromolecules, and/or precipitate within the brain tissue. It is also proposed that Gd species enter the brain parenchyma along penetrating cortical arteries in periarterial pial-glial basement membranes and leave the brain along intramural peri-arterial drainage (IPAD) pathways. Lastly, Gd/GBCAs may access the brain parenchyma directly from the blood through the BBB in the walls of capillaries. It is crucial to distinguish between the physiological distribution and drainage pathways for GBCAs and the possible dissociation of less thermodynamically/kinetically stable GBCAs that lead to long-term Gd deposition in the brain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5. TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.

CME Information: Retention of Gadolinium in Brain Parenchyma: Pathways for Speciation, Access, and Distribution. A Critical Review.

If you wish to rpan class="Disease">eceive credit for this activity, please repan class="Chemical">fer to the website: www.wileyhealthlearning.com/JMRI

Educational Objectives

Upon completion of this educational activity, participants will be better able to describe the access, outflow and retention of Gadolinium species in the brain parenchyma.

Activity Disclosures

No commercial support has been accepted related to the development or publication of this activity.

Editor‐in‐Chief: Mark E. Schweitzer, MD, discloses no relevant financial relationships.

CME Editor: Mustafa R. Bashir, MD, discloses grants from CymaBay, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Metacrine, NGM and Pinnacle, institutional support from Clinical Research, ProSciento, and Siemens as principal investigator, and consultant fees from MedPace.

Authors Marlène Rasschaert, pan class="Chemical">PhD and Jean‐Marc Idée, pan class="Chemical">PharmD, MS disclose employment at Guerbert and were not involved in the development of clinical content or recommendations for this CME activity. The remaining authors reported no conflicts of interest or financial relationships relevant to this article.

This activity underwent peer review in line with the standards of editorial integrity and publication ethics. Conflicts of interest have been identified and resolved in accordance with pan class="Disease">John Wiley and Sons, Inc.'s Policy on Activity Disclosure and Conflict of Interest.

Accreditation

pan class="Disease">John Wiley and Sons, Inc. is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

John Wiley and Sons, Inc. designates this journal‐based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing medical education credit for this activity, please consult your propan class="Chemical">fessional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within 1 hour. To successfully earn credit, pan class="Species">participants must complete the activity during the valid credit period, which is up to two years from initial publication. Additionally, up to 3 attempts and a score of 70% or better is needed to pass the post test.

CONTRAST RESOLUTION of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is improved by the intravenous administpan class="Species">ration of contrast agents. Around 30% of MRI procedures are associated with such injections, especially for central nervous system (CNS) examinations, angiography, and breast imaging. In 2016, it was estimated that ~30 million procedures per year were contrast‐enhanced.

Until recently, it was admitted that gadolinium‐based contrast agents (GBCAs) did not cross the functional blood–brain barrier (BBB) and were immediately cleared from the central nervous system through venous drainage, thus allowing the diagnosis of tumors and other lesions where the BBB is no longer functional.

It has been common practice for a large number of pan class="Chemical">GBCA‐enhanced MR procedures to be performed for the follow‐up of benign or pan class="Disease">malignant tumors (up to 59 consecutive administrations in one study, 86 in another ).

In early 2014, a Japanese team reported gradual T1 hyperintensities in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced MR images following serial administpan class="Species">rations of n>an class="Chemical">GBCAs to patients with normal renal function. However, T1 hyperintensities are not limited to these structures, since additional areas of the brain are found to be enhanced, including the anterior pituitary gland. This was especially noticeable in patients who received a large number of administrations of GBCA. This causal link with tissue gadolinium (Gd) retention was confirmed by an avalanche of nonclinical and clinical studies, including in pediatric patients , and healthy animals. , , , , So far, there is no evidence that Gd retention leads to any neurological disorders.

pan class="Chemical">GBCAs difpan class="Chemical">fer according to the molecular structure of their polyaminopolycarboxylic ligand (linear or macrocyclic, ionic, or nonionic/neutral) which determines their thermodynamic properties (Table 1).

TABLE 1

Main Characteristics of Gadolinium‐Based Contrast Agents Currently Marketed or Under Clinical Development

International nonproprietary name		Gadopiclenol	Gadoterate	Gadobutrol	Gadoteridol	Gadobenate	Gadodiamide	Gadopentetate
Trade name		NAa	Dotarem	Gadovist/Gadavist	ProHance	MultiHance	Omniscan	Magnevist
Ligand structure		Macrocyclic	Macrocyclic	Macrocyclic	Macrocyclic	Linear	Linear	Linear
Ligand charge		Nonionic	Ionic	Nonionic	Nonionic	Ionic	Nonionic	Ionic
Osmolality at 37°C (mOsm/kg) at marketed concentration		843	1350	1603	630	1970	789	1960
Relaxivity (r1/r2) (mM−1·s−1) at 37°C and 1.5 T	in water	12.2/15	2.9/3.2	3.3/3.9	2.9/3.2	4/4.3	3.3/3.6	3.3/3.9
	In biological medium	12.8/15.1	3.6/4.3	5.2/6.1	4.1/5	6.3/8.7	4.3/5.2	4.1/4.6
Log Kcond (pH 7.4)		15.5	19.3	14.7	17.1	18.4	14.9	17.7
Kinetic stability in acidic conditions (HCl, pH 1.2) and 37°C	Dissociation half‐life	20 ± 3 days	4 ± 0.5 days	18 h	4 h	ND	<5 s	<5 s

Gadopiclenol is under clinical development.

Main Characteristics of pan class="Chemical">Gadolinium‐Based Contrast Agents pan class="Chemical">Currently Marketed or Under Clinical Development

It rapidly bpan class="Disease">ecame apn>parent that the gradual apn>pearance of a T1 hypn>ersignal in spn>pan class="Disease">ecific structures of the CNS was almost exclusively associated with prior administrations of linear GBCAs. , This finding, associated with the previous causal relationship of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis with linear GBCAs, in patients with severe renal failure prompted the European Medicines Agency to suspend the marketing authorizations for intravenous linear products. Subsequently, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), while maintaining the authorization for linear GBCAs, recognized that these agents resulted in more brain retention than macrocyclics. The FDA stated that healthcare professionals should consider the Gd retention characteristics of each compound when selecting a GBCA for patients who may be at risk. The FDA also requested radiologists to minimize repeated GBCA imaging studies and urged companies to conduct postmarketing nonclinical and clinical studies.

Using mass sppan class="Disease">ectrometry, several teams repn>orted the presence of n>an class="Chemical">Gd deposits in the structures in question. , Interestingly, the strength of the T1 hyperintensity was correlated with the number of prior administrations of GBCAs. These data raised a number of important questions: 1) How does Gd access the (even healthy) CNS parenchyma?; 2) In which chemical form(s)?; 3) Do all molecular categories of GBCAs behave in a similar way and, if not, why not?; 4) Where precisely does Gd accumulate?; 5) What are the pathways for elimination of Gd from the brain? 6) Is this phenomenon associated with toxic effects? We will focus on the first five of these questions (1–5). So far, there is no clinical evidence of harmful consequences of intracerebral Gd deposition. ,

Gadolinium Location and Speciation in Brain Tissues: Chemical Considerations

Numerous nonclinical studies performed in small (rodents) or large (pan class="Species">sheep, n>an class="Species">pigs) mammalian species have demonstrated that single or repeated administration of linear GBCAs leads to dramatically higher concentrations of “elemental” (ie, total, regardless of the species) Gd in brain parenchyma than do macrocyclic GBCAs, when measured long after the last administration (Fig. 1). , , , , , , , , This is yet again suggestive of dechelation of these highly hydrophilic molecules. Interestingly, the concentration of elemental Gd measured in brain structures of rats was found to be the highest in the deep cerebellar nuclei, which include the dentate (lateral) nuclei; this suggests a clinical relevance for these findings.

FIGURE 1

Concentrations of elemental Gd determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry in the various dissected brain areas (cerebellum*: except for DCNs) 4½ weeks after the last injection to rats (20*0.6 mmol Gd/kg body weight). Reprinted from Ref. 26 with permission.

The possibility of gradual in situ dissociation of linear GBCAs in patients was soon proposed. This phenomenon may involve the kinetic stability of GBCAs that is far higher with macrocyclic GBCAs than with linear agents.

In pan class="Species">rats with pan class="Disease">renal impairment repeatedly treated with gadodiamide, the presence of soluble and dissociated Gd (representing around 90% of circulating elemental Gd) in plasma was reported 6 days after the last of 20 daily injections.

Brain Structure Affinities for Gd and Endogenous Metals

The question arises regarding the affinity of pan class="Chemical">Gd spn>pan class="Disease">ecies for certain CNS structures. Patients who receive a large (>35) number of administrations of linear GBCAs, and thus a higher cumulative dose, exhibit T1 hypersignals in several brain structures (posterior thalamus, substantia nigra, red nucleus, cerebellar peduncle, colliculi), in addition to dentate nucleus and globus pallidus. It is worth emphasizing that these structures have the particular feature of being associated with a high concentration of iron. , Dentate nucleus and globus pallidus are particularly rich in iron, but also copper and zinc, although at a lower concentration. , , Interestingly, the distribution of elemental Gd concentrations among the various CNS structures correlated significantly with that of Fe in rats treated with linear GBCAs, a result consistent with the previous feature. Laser ablation‐inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA‐ICP MS) studies performed in samples of sheep cerebellum showed colocalization of Gd with Zn, Fe, and Cu 10 weeks following single injections of linear GBCAs (but not after macrocyclic GBCAs). However, in another LA‐ICP‐MS study performed on a single human dentate nucleus, no apparent correlation between Gd and Fe, Cu or Zn could be observed.

If one considers that the colocalization of pan class="Chemical">Gd and pan class="Chemical">metals is not a hazard, several hypotheses can be proposed:

Endogenous pan class="Chemical">Fe may exchange with n>an class="Chemical">Gd (transmetallation). The apparent thermodynamic stability constant values of the Fe‐L chelates are often higher than those of the Gd‐L chelates (L for ligand) (eg, log Kcond values are 23.4 and 17.7 for Fe‐DTPA and Gd‐DTPA, respectively). However, to comply with this hypothesis Fe must be labile and locally present at a high concentration. Fe is mobilized by transport or storage proteins such as ferritin, transferrin, or hemoglobin, and the labile pool of Fe is therefore low. The lack of reliable data on concentrations and locations of labile pools of Fe in the CNS structures of interest makes it difficult to draw conclusions on this hypothesis.

Another hypothesis is that Gd is concentrated at the same locations as Fe because it uses the same access pathways. This would involve the prior dissociation of GBCA and the binding of Gd to Fe transporter proteins. Gd can bind transferrin (Tf) with a weaker affinity when compared to Fe. In the case of gadodiamide (ie, Gd‐DTPA‐BMA), this would translate into:

The thermodynamic constant value of Fe‐DTPA‐BMA is greater than that of Gd‐DTPA‐BMA (gadodiamide) (log KTherm values are 21.9 and 16.9, respectively). However, there are two binding sites for Fe with Tf (log Kcond value is 20.2 for site 1 and 39.3 for site 2). If the respective local concentrations for the above species allow, a Gd vs. Fe transmetallation process with the first site of Tf would be possible but has not been demonstrated so far.

GBCAs would dissociate before entering the dentate nucleus (consistent with the finding of dissociated and soluble Gd in the blood compartment ) and Gd would pass through similar pathways as endogenous metals.

Gd from low‐stability GBCAs might also exchange with ionized calcium, as previously suggested , (if local concentration of the latter metal allows it).

In addition to Fe, colocation of Gd and P was reported in rat cerebellum in addition to the postmortem human cerebellum, , consistent with the presence of GdPO4. Gadolinium signal was also found by LA‐ICP‐MS in the dentate nucleus and cerebellar cortex of one patient who received macrocyclic GBCAs twice (the last administration was only 2 weeks before death). The Gd signal colocalized with those of Fe, Cu, Zn, and P. Of note is that the LA‐ICP‐MS technique does not allow speciation studies, and therefore is by no means indicative of a putative dissociation of Gd from the macrocyclic GBCAs.

Transmission elpan class="Disease">ectron microscopn>y (TEM) studies associated with nanoscale span class="Disease">econdary ion mass spectrometry demonstrated that P‐associated Gd deposits were located in various areas of deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN). It is worth emphasizing that TEM does not allow the study of soluble Gd species. Therefore, data from this technique should be analyzed in conjunction with other, complementary, approaches.

Gadolinium Speciation in Brain Tissues

pan class="Chemical">Gd spn>pan class="Disease">eciation in the brain has been the subject of a large number of studies. , , , , , In homogenates of cerebellum from rats treated with linear agents, the presence of soluble macromolecular (250–300‐kDa) Gd‐containing species was observed 24 days after the last administration, while no such effect was found with macrocyclic GBCAs. Still, in linear GBCAs‐treated rats, Gd was found to a large extent in the insoluble brain tissue fraction. In a subsequent study, following repeated administrations of the linear GBCA gadodiamide to rats, insoluble species of Gd in the cerebellum were estimated to be 53% of the elemental Gd levels, while the intact Gd chelate was 18%. This suggests that an additional ~30% must have been present in the soluble fraction. It was proposed that these soluble and dissociated Gd species explained the T1 hyperintensity found in the cerebellum. One year after the last administration of a linear GBCA to rats, 75% of the elemental Gd detected in the cerebellum was bound to macromolecules (MW > 66.5 kDa) as soluble species, with the proportion increasing over time. Such an effect can be explained by the progressive binding or, alternatively, by the faster elimination of the intact linear Gd chelate. Conversely, after repeated injection of the macrocyclic GBCA gadoterate, only traces of Gd, in the intact chelated form, were measured in the soluble fraction. In another study, a single administration of a very high dose to mice confirmed that, after 10 days, several endogenous molecules were bound to Gd from the linear GBCA gadopentetate, while no such effect was observed with the macrocyclic GBCA gadoterate. However, Gd from the macrocyclic agent gadobutrol was also found in several molecules with molecular weight larger than GBCAs. The reasons for this discrepancy between GBCAs are unclear. Lastly, infusion of the chelating agent Ca‐DTPA 7 weeks after a single administration of a linear GBCA to rats was associated with significant excretion of Gd in the urine. In parallel, the amount of Gd in the brain parenchyma decreased. This is consistent with mobilization of Gd from tissues. Conversely, no such effect was found after administration of a macrocyclic agent.

Interestingly, even a single administration of a clinically‐relevant dose of GBCA demonstrated that linear GBCAs resulted in significantly higher residual Gd concentrations in the cerebellar tissue than a macrocyclic GBCA at the late timepoint of 5 months. Furthermore, for the linear GBCAs, two classes of Gd species were detected: intact Gd chelate and Gd bound to soluble macromolecules (>80 kDa), whereas, in the case of the macrocyclic GBCA, Gd was detected only in its chelated form. The nature of the macromolecules that bind Gd remains unknown. Sialic acid residues or glycosaminoglycans structures on the surface of cells, or within the extracellular matrix, may be interesting targets. ,

The most likely hypothesis is therefore that the less kinetically stable linear pan class="Chemical">GBCAs gradually dissociate in tissues, while macrocyclics remain intact and are excreted unaltered in the urine (Fig. 2).

FIGURE 2

Comparative hypothetical gradual behavior of macrocyclic and linear GBCAs subsequent to their uptake by the central nervous system. GdL: chelated Gd; M: endogenous metal; ML: chelated metal.

Taken together, these data are consistent with the thermodynamic characteristics of pan class="Chemical">GBCAs. , Obviously, knowledge of the nature of the macromolpan class="Disease">ecule(s) that bind Gd and represent the soluble Gd species could help to make significant progress in the understanding of the distribution and retention of GBCAs in brain tissues, and possibly in the putative long‐term toxicologic consequences. Future progress will probably come from combined and complementary bioanalytical techniques.

Long‐Term Follow‐Up of Gadolinium Concentrations in the Brain Parenchyma Following Repeated Administrations of GBCAs

Two teams independently followed up the concentpan class="Species">rations of elemental n>an class="Chemical">Gd in the brain parenchyma of rats for up to 1 year after the last of repeated administrations of linear and macrocyclic GBCAs. , Both studies concurred in: 1) a lower elemental Gd concentration in the CNS at completion of the treatment period with macrocyclic GBCAs vs. linear agents; 2) with macrocyclic GBCAs, there was continuous clearance of residual Gd from the brain, with no indication of a steady‐state tissue level. No such effect was observed with linear GBCAs. Furthermore, an increase in the DCN‐to‐brainstem T1 signal intensity (SI) ratio was found with linear GBCAs and persisted for the full 1‐year observation period (Fig. 3). , These studies clearly distinguished between normal clearance of GBCA and retention of dissociated Gd.

FIGURE 3

Typical “sea urchin”‐shaped Gd deposit located in the interstitial space of the lateral nucleus (corresponding to the dentate nucleus in humans) of a rat repeatedly treated with gadodiamide (12 mmolGd/kg cumulated). The presence of Gd was validated by electron energy loss spectroscopy.

Typical “pan class="Species">sea urchin”‐shapn>ed pan class="Chemical">Gd deposit located in the interstitial space of the lateral nucleus (corresponding to the dentate nucleus in humans) of a rat repeatedly treated with gadodiamide (12 mmolGd/kg cumulated). The presence of Gd was validated by electron energy loss spectroscopy.

Cerebral Anatomical Structures Associated With Gadolinium Deposition

Organ Level

In addition to the dentate nucleus and the globus pallidus, postmortem studies demonstpan class="Species">rated the presence of elemental n>an class="Chemical">Gd in the thalamus and pons of patients who received repeated administrations of gadodiamide. Further to these structures, a gradual T1 hypersignal was reported in the substantia nigra, red nucleus, cerebellar peduncle, and colliculi. This effect is highly suggestive of Gd deposition. Interestingly, T1 hypersignal was also reported in the choroid plexus (CP) of patients and of rats. We found a substantial concentration (13.2 ± 6.4 nmol/g) of elemental Gd in the CP dissected from rats 4 months after the last of 20 administrations of gadodiamide (36 mmolGd/kg cumulated) (unpublished data). Furthermore, 4.5 hours after a single administration of GBCAs to rats, the presence of elemental Gd was reported in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Concentrations of Gd were higher in the CSF than in the blood. In this study, CSF Gd was almost completely cleared after 24 hours. Elemental Gd was found in the CSF of adult and pediatric patients who received a single GBCA application. Higher concentrations of elemental Gd were associated with an age of at least 18 years and total proteins levels in the CSF above 35 mg/dL. In a prior study, concentrations of elemental Gd in the CSF increased within the first 8 hours after intravenous GBCA administration, and then decreased between 8 and 48 hours. The GBCA was almost completely cleared from the CSF after 48 hours.

Some studies demonstrated the presence of elemental Gd in other structures, especially the olfactory bulbs of mice and rats (Fig. 1). , , To our knowledge, no T1 signal enhancement has been reported so far in olfactory bulbs in humans or rats. Of note is that the olfactory bulb is about 0.01% of the human brain by volume and 2% of the mouse brain by volume. Finally, it should be recalled that, in addition to the brain, numerous studies have found the sustained presence of elemental Gd in multiple organs or tissues, including the bone (cortical and bone marrow), skin, kidney, liver, etc., both in animals and patients. , , , , ,

Brain Tissue Levels

Detailed localization studies, by means of LA‐ICP‐MS, demonstrated the presence of Gd in the granular layer of the cerebellar cortex of rats , and of human subjects , after repeated administration of linear GBCAs. Elemental Gd concentrations were similar to those measured in DCN. No T1 signal enhancement has been reported so far in cerebellar cortex, to our knowledge. This suggests that Gd is present in a mostly insoluble form at this level.

Cellular Level

TEM studies associated with sppan class="Disease">ectroscopn>y techniques for characterization showed the presence of electron‐dense Gd deposits in the cerebellum of rats treated with linear GBCAs , , , and in patients. , Except for two, , these studies focused on the dentate nucleus or its equivalent in rats, the lateral nucleus. Gd deposits had a spheroid and spiny shape resembling a “sea urchin,” ~200–300 nm in diameter with 2‐nm‐wide spines, located in the interstitial space and close to vascular basement membranes (Fig. 3). The copresence of Ca, N, and O was reported, as well as P, which is consistent with the presence of insoluble GdPO4 salt in these deposits.

Furthermore, Gd deposits were also associated with intracellular membrane‐bound pigment aggregates within glial cells of the rat DCN. These pigments were identified as lipofuscin. Gd deposits were also identified in the CP of linear GBCAs‐treated rats, in fibrocyte‐like cells, in the interstitium located perivascularly between the basement membranes of a capillary, and also in the epithelial basement membrane of the CP. Lastly, in specimens of human dentate nuclei, deposits of insoluble Gd were found within the nucleus of a neuron. To our knowledge, no such finding has been reported in rats so far.

CNS Access Pathways for GBCAs: Certainties and Assumptions

Intravenous route is not the only pathway for exogenous pan class="Chemical">metals presenting an effect on the MRI signal. Manganese, another cation with a strong shortening effect on T1 relaxation time, can easily access the blood, then the brain parenchyma through the olfactory system, as shown in welders exposed to Mn‐containing fumes and who presented increased T1 hyperintensity in various brain structures, especially the globus pallidus.

Regarding, GBCAs, our hypothesis is that there are three access pathways for Gd species into the brain parenchyma, as discussed below. We propose an integrated approach for the access of GBCAs in the CNS and their normal distribution, including intraparenchymal Gd speciation.

Blood Cerebrospinal Fluid Barrier Access Pathway

Following systemic injpan class="Disease">ection, n>an class="Chemical">GBCAs, regardless of their structural category (and/or possibly dissociated and soluble Gd species from less stable agents), enter the CSF compartment, as shown by direct dosage in patients who underwent lumbar puncture or, indirectly, by T2‐weighted fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI. , , , , Interestingly, this increase in the T2 SI was prolonged, with a significant increase in the perineural space of the distal optic nerve sheath, perivascular spaces (PVS) of the basal ganglia, foramen magnum, and prepontine cistern, detected at 3 hours postadministration (p.a.) of a GBCA. The effect was still noticeable 24 hours p.a. This is consistent with data in rats where T2 signal peaks in CSF‐containing structures were observed at 9 or 25 minutes p.a. The T2 SI increase was also detected in the CP and brain ventricles. It is worth noting that a reduction in T2 signal amplitude was in the expected direction of bulk flow of CSF, that is, from the lateral to the 3rd and 4th ventricles, then to the subarachnoid space.

pan class="Chemical">Passage of n>an class="Chemical">Gd species from the blood compartment to the CSF through the fenestrated and leaky capillaries of CP, then to the CSF through the CP plexus epithelium (the “blood cerebrospinal fluid barrier” or BCSFB ), is therefore likely and consistent with the presence of insoluble Gd deposits at this level. The exact pathway by which GBCAs cross BSCFB remains speculative. This barrier can be crossed by passive diffusion, diffusion facilitated by membrane influx (eg, solute carrier family), and efflux transporters, or through vesicular transfer or transcytosis due to the presence of nonspecific mediators like vesicles‐associated membrane proteins. , GBCAs (or other soluble Gd species) would escape efflux transporters in the CP epithelial cells, at least in part. It is likely that low‐stability GBCA and/or dissociated and soluble Gd, bound to a macromolecule, are sequestrated in the CP. This phenomenon would explain the T1 hypersignal observed in rats and patients with renal failure (therefore sensitized to a higher circulating GBCA concentration). A proportion of the GBCAs would dissociate locally, as demonstrated by the presence of Gd deposits in the perivascular interstitial spaces in the CP and in the basement membranes of the CP epithelium.

The traditional pathway for reabsorption is that, once in the pan class="Gene">CSF, soluble n>an class="Chemical">GBCAs are transported to the subarachnoid space to reach arachnoid granulations for eventual reabsorption into the venous blood compartment through a pressure‐dependent gradient. However, there is mounting evidence, both in humans and in rodents, that a significant proportion of CSF drains to lymph nodes, especially through the nasal mucosa via the cribriform plate of the ethmoid bone and along dural lymphatics. , ,

We propose that a fraction of soluble pan class="Chemical">GBCA present in the n>an class="Gene">CSF would cross the ependymal lining to access the interstitium of the brain (Fig. 4). ex vivo application of lanthanum nitrate to the ventricular surface of mice showed the ion winding through the extracellular spaces of the ependyma and through the interwoven extracellular spaces of the astrocyte layer. Dissociated and soluble Gd may follow the same pathway. Following intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of the neutral agent gadodiamide to rats, the molecule was distributed from lateral ventricles to the fourth ventricle and crossed the BCSFB and the ependymal layer. Conversely, the anionic GBCA gadopentetate injected i.c.v. to rats was confined to the intraventricular space, probably because it was repelled by the sialic acid residues present at the luminal pole of ependymal cells. Therefore, this BSCFB pathway may be valid for neutral GBCAs only. Furthermore, the strongly anionic nature of the extracellular matrix (which contains large amounts of hyaluronan) would probably impair the diffusion of negatively charged molecules such as ionic GBCAs.

FIGURE 4

Summary of proposed inflow pathways for GBCAs in the brain. There appear to be three major pathways for the access of Gd into the brain (1) (pink) via the CSF and (6) (pink) directly from the blood. (1) GBCA enters the ventricular CSF from the blood via the blood‐CSF barrier in the CP epithelium. (2) GBCA then enters the brain through the ependyma. (3) CSF containing GBCA flows from the ventricles into the subarachnoid space. (4) GBCA then enters the surface of the brain with CSF along periarterial pial‐glial basement membranes and (5) enters the brain parenchyma. (6) The third route for entry of GBCA into the brain is from the blood via the BBB in cerebral capillaries. The Gd speciation processes are summarized. Intact GBCAs (regardless of their chemical structure) cross the fenestrated capillaries of CP to access the CSF. Subsequently, the neutral molecules cross the ependymal lining to access the brain interstitium. Once present in the interstitium, low‐stability (linear) GBCAs transmetallate with endogenous metals and dissociated Gd either precipitates in the form of spiny deposits and/or binds endogenous macromolecules, thus remaining trapped in the parenchyma. The GBCAs that remain in the CSF drain to cervical lymph nodes. CSF: cerebrospinal fluid, GBCA: gadolinium‐based contrast agent; SAS: subarachnoidal space.

Summary of proposed inflow pathways for pan class="Chemical">GBCAs in the brain. There apn>pear to be three major pathways for the access of n>an class="Chemical">Gd into the brain (1) (pink) via the CSF and (6) (pink) directly from the blood. (1) GBCA enters the ventricular CSF from the blood via the blood‐CSF barrier in the CP epithelium. (2) GBCA then enters the brain through the ependyma. (3) CSF containing GBCA flows from the ventricles into the subarachnoid space. (4) GBCA then enters the surface of the brain with CSF along periarterial pial‐glial basement membranes and (5) enters the brain parenchyma. (6) The third route for entry of GBCA into the brain is from the blood via the BBB in cerebral capillaries. The Gd speciation processes are summarized. Intact GBCAs (regardless of their chemical structure) cross the fenestrated capillaries of CP to access the CSF. Subsequently, the neutral molecules cross the ependymal lining to access the brain interstitium. Once present in the interstitium, low‐stability (linear) GBCAs transmetallate with endogenous metals and dissociated Gd either precipitates in the form of spiny deposits and/or binds endogenous macromolecules, thus remaining trapped in the parenchyma. The GBCAs that remain in the CSF drain to cervical lymph nodes. CSF: cerebrospinal fluid, GBCA: gadolinium‐based contrast agent; SAS: subarachnoidal space.

After neutral pan class="Chemical">GBCAs have diffused into the interstitium, they may reach n>an class="Chemical">metal‐rich structures. This is especially the case with the dentate nucleus close to the 4th ventricle, or the globus pallidus. , , In the case of rat DCN, we found that concentrations of endogenous elemental metals (ICP‐MS) were in descending order: Fe (700 ± 200 nmol/g) > Zn (220 ± 30 nmol/g) > Cu (80 ± 15 nmol/g) (unpublished data). Subsequent to local transmetallation with endogenous metal, Gd dissociated from a linear GBCA would therefore be associated with Tf (76 kDa) or ferritin (450 kDa). Involvement of other macromolecules involved in the homeostasis of CNS metals may be also speculatively considered (calmodulin, parvalbumin, hyaluronic acid, etc.). Next, the Gd‐macromolecules would be endocytosed into glial cells (and possibly neurons) and eventually accumulate in lysosomes in the form of the nondegradable pigment lipofuscin, , as sometimes found associated with Gd deposits. Anatomical proximity of CNS structures to the ventricles would indeed play a role in Gd uptake. Actually, both the endogenous metal concentration and anatomy should be considered together (for example, the thalamus is closer to the 3rd ventricle than the globus pallidus, but its Fe concentration is approximately four times lower). The granular layer of the cerebellar cortex is rich in phosphorus, a finding that may explain the absence of T1 hypersignal at this level because of precipitation of Gd in the form of GdPO4.

Access Pathways Across the BBB

It has been stated that the presence of electron‐dense Gd deposits within the interstitium would challenge the classical understanding of the impermeability of the BBB to GBCAs. In rats, Gd deposits were found mainly in basement membranes or within cells around capillaries.

It was initially reported that the electron‐dense Gd deposits were located within endothelial cells. , Subsequently, a more detailed analysis revealed that they are located in capillary basement membranes (Figs. 5 and 6). This suggests that the Gd retained in the brain is also likely to be derived from the blood. Perivascular, Gd‐containing deposits were also reported in the olfactory bulb of rats treated with linear GBCAs (gadodiamide and gadopentetate) but not the macrocyclic agent gadoterate.

FIGURE 5

Typical aspect of sea‐urchin Gd deposits localized in the basement membrane of a capillary. The presence of Gd was validated by electron energy loss spectroscopy (not shown).

FIGURE 6

Sea urchin–like, spheroid‐shaped Gd deposits (red circles) localized in the basement membrane (1) and in the perivascular space (2) of a capillary (from the DCN of a gadodiamide‐treated rat). A indicates astrocyte end‐feet; yellow arrows indicate basement membranes of glia limitans; orange arrows indicate unified basement membranes of endothelial cell and pericyte adluminal side; red arrows indicate basement membrane of one pericyte abluminal side; red stars indicate basement membrane coalescence of glia limitans and pericyte or of endothelial cell); EC, endothelial cell; L, vessel lumen; P, pericyte. The presence of Gd was validated by electron energy loss spectroscopy (not shown). Reprinted from Ref. 42, modified, with permission.

Typical aspect of sea‐urchin pan class="Chemical">Gd deposits localized in the basement membrane of a capillary. The presence of Gd was validated by electron energy loss spectroscopy (not shown).

pan class="Species">Sea urchin–like, spheroid‐shapn>ed pan class="Chemical">Gd deposits (red circles) localized in the basement membrane (1) and in the perivascular space (2) of a capillary (from the DCN of a gadodiamide‐treated rat). A indicates astrocyte end‐feet; yellow arrows indicate basement membranes of glia limitans; orange arrows indicate unified basement membranes of endothelial cell and pericyte adluminal side; red arrows indicate basement membrane of one pericyte abluminal side; red stars indicate basement membrane coalescence of glia limitans and pericyte or of endothelial cell); EC, endothelial cell; L, vessel lumen; P, pericyte. The presence of Gd was validated by electron energy loss spectroscopy (not shown). Reprinted from Ref. 42, modified, with permission.

Colocation of pan class="Chemical">Gd with P in the vicinity of vessels , , modified, with permission.

Colocation of Gd with P in the vicinity of vessels , is consistent with the precipitation of Gd in the form of GdPO4 present in the sea urchin‐shaped deposits found. This phenomenon might result from transmetallation with calcium, a metal crucial for the tight regulation of cerebral blood flow at the level of the neurovascular unit.

However, the presence of insoluble pan class="Chemical">Gd deposits should not prpan class="Disease">eclude the possibility of soluble Gd species (undetectable by TEM).

THE PERIVASCULAR (PIAL‐GLIAL) ACCESS PATHWAY

The involvement of the “glymphatic” system in the distribution and clearance of pan class="Chemical">GBCAs from brain parenchyma is pan class="Chemical">currently the subject of much speculation. , , , , ,

Actually, the “glymphatic” concept needs to be refined, esppan class="Disease">ecially with regard to the role of glia and transfer of solutes into the extracellular spaces (ECS) of the brain. There are arguments against the involvement of the “glymphatic” system, at least as it was initially proposed. First, it would involve aquaporin 4 (AQP4) localized to astrocyte endfeet and anchored to the perivascular basement membrane. It is unclear whether AQP4 is involved in the passage of GBCAs. Actually, the pore in each monomer of AQP4 narrows to ∼2.8 Å, thus effectively excluding the permeation of molecules larger than water. Studies in Aqp4 −/− mice may allow this issue to be elucidated. Furthermore, it was initially suggested (in studies using an ionic GBCA as tracer) that the outflow pathway from the brain parenchyma was alongside veins. However, subsequent experiments have shown that when tracers in the CSF enter the brain, they do so along pial‐glial basement membranes and then they flow out of the brain along intramural peri‐arterial drainage (IPAD) pathways within 30 minutes and not along the walls of veins. , Finally, the hydraulic resistance of the brain ECS would restrict the convective flow, as initially proposed.

The existence of PVS around arteries as they penetrate the cerebral cortex is disputed and may actually be related to the presence of artifactual swelling of astrocytes.

We propose that water‐soluble substances in the CSF enter the surface of the brain along periarterial pial‐glial basement membranes (Fig. 4) and leave the brain along IPAD pathways, one of the major routes for the drainage of brain fluid and solutes and a very rapid process. ,

In addition to the BCSFB pathway, it is therefore proposed that GBCAs enter the brain parenchyma through the perivascular pial‐glial basement membranes system (Fig. 4), consistent with LA‐ICP‐MS data and recent advances in the field.

Lastly, an MRI study suggested that GBCA enters the aqueous chamber of the eye following infiltration via the ciliary body and drainage along the perineural space of the optic nerve. Following intrathecal administration of a GBCA, an increase in T1 SI was observed within the optic nerve, optic chiasm, optic tract, and primary visual cortex, thus indicating direct communication between CSF of the subarachnoid space and the extravascular space of the visual pathway. The drainage of fluid and solutes from the eye is only now being clarified. Interestingly, one case report has shown insoluble Gd deposits in and around blood vessels of the choriocapillaris of the eye.

Clearance Pathways

It is likely that, in the event that GBCAs present in the interstitial fluid (ISF) of the brain do not cross metal‐rich structures or are unable to transmetallate with an endogenous metal, they will drain out of the interstitium along basement membranes in the walls of capillaries as well as along basement membranes in the tunica media of cerebral arterioles and arteries (the IPAD pathway) (Fig. 7). The physiological IPAD pathway is situated within the smooth muscle cell basement membranes in the tunica media of the arteries. This drainage phenomenon is very rapid, which may explain why it has not been shown so far in the case of GBCAs. However, long‐term washout of intact GBCAs may follow another, still unknown, pathway. Importantly, the entry and outflow pathways are anatomically distinct.

FIGURE 7

The clearance pathway (Intramural Peri‐Arterial Drainage, IPAD). (1) IPAD begins with the entry of interstitial fluid ISF and solutes from the brain parenchyma into basement membranes in the walls of cerebral capillaries. (2) Fluid and solutes then drain into the IPAD pathways in the basement membranes that surround smooth muscle cells in the tunica media of arteries. (3) It is along the IPAD pathway that fluid and solutes are eliminated from the brain through drainage to lymph nodes.

The clearance pathway (Intramural Peri‐Arterial Drainage, IPAD). (1) IPAD begins with the entry of interstitial fluid ISF and solutes from the brain parenchyma into basement membranes in the walls of pan class="Disease">cerebral capillaries. (2) Fluid and solutes then drain into the IPAD pathways in the basement membranes that surround smooth muscle cells in the tunica media of arteries. (3) It is along the IPAD pathway that fluid and solutes are eliminated from the brain through drainage to lymph nodes.

Lastly, most of the evidence suggests that only ~15% of tracers draining along the Ipan class="Chemical">PAD pathway pass into the pan class="Gene">CSF, whereas the remaining ~85% of the tracer travels along the walls of intracranial arteries to cervical lymph nodes.

Lymphatic Drainage

There are no lymphatic vessels in the brain parenchyma, but there is lymphatic drainage of interstitial fluid from the brain to lymph nodes of the npan class="Disease">eck along the walls of cerebral arteries. This drainage is via the IPAD pathways along basement membranes of capn>illaries and between smooth muscle cells in the walls of arteries. , , ,

Conclusion

The finding of T1 hypersignal in the brain of pan class="Species">patients who repn>eatedly rpan class="Disease">eceived linear GBCAs led to a very large number of nonclinical and clinical studies that profoundly challenged several dogma regarding the distribution of GBCAs in the healthy brain. It seems important to distinguish between “physiological” distribution and excretion of chelated GBCAs from the brain parenchyma from Gd deposition that follows repeated administrations of linear GBCAs and which is driven by their thermodynamic properties. The follow up, by MRI, of the still chelated, intact, GBCAs may have useful clinical implications. In this review, we propose three access pathways for GBCAs into the brain parenchyma:

Entry into the pan class="Gene">CSF via the choroid plexus and then from the pan class="Gene">CSF through the walls of the ventricles directly into the brain;

From the pan class="Gene">CSF in the subarachnoid space along penetpan class="Species">rating arteries in periarterial (periarteriolar) pial‐glial basement membranes;

From blood through the BBB (pan class="Chemical">Gd found in the basement membranes of capn>illaries).

The outflow pathway for Gd in the interstitial fluid of the brain parenchyma is most probably along basement membranes in the walls of cerebral capillaries and arteries as the IPAD pathways. , , ,

Grant Support

No grant support.