Literature DB >> 32246727

Ancient tropical extinctions at high latitudes contributed to the latitudinal diversity gradient.

Andrea S Meseguer1,2,3, Fabien L Condamine2.   

Abstract

Global biodiversity currently peaks at the equator and decreases toward the poles. Growing fossil evidence suggest this hump-shaped latitudinal diversity gradient (LDG) has not been persistent through time, with similar diversity across latitudes flattening out the LDG during past greenhouse periods. However, when and how diversity declined at high latitudes to generate the modern LDG remains an open question. Although diversity-loss scenarios have been proposed, they remain mostly undemonstrated. We outline the "asymmetric gradient of extinction and dispersal" framework that contextualizes previous ideas behind the LDG under a time-variable scenario. Using phylogenies and fossils of Testudines, Crocodilia, and Lepidosauria, we find that the hump-shaped LDG could be explained by (1) disproportionate extinctions of high-latitude tropical-adapted clades when climate transitioned from greenhouse to icehouse, and (2) equator-ward biotic dispersals tracking their climatic preferences when tropical biomes became restricted to the equator. Conversely, equivalent diversification rates across latitudes can account for the formation of an ancient flat LDG. The inclusion of fossils in macroevolutionary studies allows revealing time-dependent extinction rates hardly detectable from phylogenies only. This study underscores that the prevailing evolutionary processes generating the LDG during greenhouses differed from those operating during icehouses.
© 2020 The Authors. Evolution © 2020 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biodiversity; Holarctic; climate change; extinction; fossils; tropics

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32246727     DOI: 10.1111/evo.13967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  8 in total

1.  A deep-time perspective on the latitudinal diversity gradient.

Authors:  Philip D Mannion
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The latitudinal diversity gradient of tetrapods across the Permo-Triassic mass extinction and recovery interval.

Authors:  Bethany J Allen; Paul B Wignall; Daniel J Hill; Erin E Saupe; Alexander M Dunhill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Pulled Diversification Rates, Lineages-Through-Time Plots, and Modern Macroevolutionary Modeling.

Authors:  Andrew J Helmstetter; Sylvain Glemin; Jos Käfer; Rosana Zenil-Ferguson; Hervé Sauquet; Hugo de Boer; Léo-Paul M J Dagallier; Nathan Mazet; Eliette L Reboud; Thomas L P Couvreur; Fabien L Condamine
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 9.160

4.  Out of the extratropics: the evolution of the latitudinal diversity gradient of Cenozoic marine plankton.

Authors:  Nussaïbah B Raja; Wolfgang Kiessling
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Truncated bimodal latitudinal diversity gradient in early Paleozoic phytoplankton.

Authors:  Axelle Zacaï; Claude Monnet; Alexandre Pohl; Grégory Beaugrand; Gary Mullins; David M Kroeck; Thomas Servais
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Analysing diversification dynamics using barcoding data: The case of an obligate mycorrhizal symbiont.

Authors:  Benoît Perez-Lamarque; Maarja Öpik; Odile Maliet; Ana C Afonso Silva; Marc-André Selosse; Florent Martos; Hélène Morlon
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 6.622

7.  Evolutionary drivers, morphological evolution and diversity dynamics of a surviving mammal clade: cainotherioids at the Eocene-Oligocene transition.

Authors:  R Weppe; M J Orliac; G Guinot; F L Condamine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.530

8.  Spatial sampling heterogeneity limits the detectability of deep time latitudinal biodiversity gradients.

Authors:  Lewis A Jones; Christopher D Dean; Philip D Mannion; Alexander Farnsworth; Peter A Allison
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 5.349

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.