Literature DB >> 3224654

Somatosensory evoked potential correlates of psychophysical magnitude estimations for tactile air-puff stimulation in man.

I Hashimoto1, K Yoshikawa, M Sasaki.   

Abstract

Brief air-puff stimuli were applied to the volar surface of the right hand to obtain both psychophysical and neurophysiological responses. The detection threshold (So) was first determined (0.56 kg . cm-2 +/- 0.20 kg . cm-2, mean +/- SD) and six levels of the stimulus intensities (So + 0.25 kg . cm-2, So + 1.25 kg . cm-2, So + 2.50 kg . cm-2, So + 3.75 kg . cm-2, So + 5.00 kg . cm-2, and So + 6.25 kg . cm-2) were employed for magnitude estimation using the stimulus level of So + 2.50 kg . cm-2 as the standard stimulus. The subject was asked to estimate numerically the series of stimulus intensities randomly presented. Cortical SEPs were recorded over the hand sensory area in response to a set of 120 air-puffs at the identical intensity level. Thus SEPs for six sets of stimulus intensities given in a random order were obtained from each subject. Six components (N20, P27, N35, P45, N60, and P75) were recorded within 100 ms following stimulation. It was seen that a simple power function with an exponent of 0.81 could be an adequate description of the stimulus-response function for magnitude estimation, as was also revealed by the high correlation coefficient (r = 0.98). Similarly, stimulus-amplitude functions of different SEP components were well represented by straight lines in double logarithmic plots. The function of the early P27-N35 had the highest exponent (0.56) and also the highest correlation coefficient (r = 0.91). Plotting subjective magnitude of the abscissa produced power functions similar to the stimulus-amplitude functions. However, higher correlations were observed for later components. The amplitudes of the four earlier components correlated with stimulus intensity when the effect of subjective magnitudes was removed. In contrast, the correlation between amplitudes and subjective magnitudes with stimulus intensity held constant was positive and significant for the later three components. These results may indicate that early SEP components represent neural coding of physical intensity while later components are more closely related to the subjective judgment of the stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3224654     DOI: 10.1007/bf00406602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  The assumptions underlying the analysis of variance.

Authors:  C EISENHART
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1947-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Somatosensory evoked potentials elicited by air-puff stimuli generated by a new high-speed air control system.

Authors:  I Hashimoto
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-09

3.  Trigeminal evoked potentials following brief air puff: enhanced signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  I Hashimoto
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 4.  Quantitative neural and psychophysical data for cutaneous mechanoreceptor function.

Authors:  L Kruger; B Kenton
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1973-01-15       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Somatosensory evoked responses elicited by corneal and nostril air puff stimulation.

Authors:  Y Matsumiya; D I Mostofsky
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1972-08

Review 6.  Electrical responses of the nervous system and subjective scales of intensity.

Authors:  B S Rosner; W R Goff
Journal:  Contrib Sens Physiol       Date:  1967

7.  Evoked response correlates of psychophysical magnitude estimates for tactile stimulation in man.

Authors:  O Franzén; K Offenloch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1969       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Detection of tactile stimuli. Thresholds of afferent units related to psychophysical thresholds in the human hand.

Authors:  R S Johansson; A B Vallbo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Short-latency cortical potentials evoked by tactile air-jet stimulation of body and face in man.

Authors:  M Schieppati; A Ducati
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-11

10.  Spatial integration of multiple-point stimuli in primary somatosensory cortical receptive fields of alert monkeys.

Authors:  E P Gardner; R M Costanzo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  6 in total

1.  A new vibrotactile stimulator for functional MRI.

Authors:  G S Harrington; C T Wright; J H Downs
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Somatosensory evoked potential correlates of psychophysical magnitude estimations for air-puff stimulation of the foot in man.

Authors:  I Hashimoto; T Gatayama; K Yoshikawa; M Sasaki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Input-output relation of the somatosensory system for mechanical air-puff stimulation of the index finger in man.

Authors:  I Hashimoto; T Gatayama; K Yoshikawa; M Sasaki; M Nomura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Somatosensory evoked potential correlates of psychophysical magnitude estimations for air-puff stimulation of the face in man.

Authors:  I Hashimoto; T Gatayama; K Yoshikawa; M Sasaki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Audiotactile interactions beyond the space and body parts around the head.

Authors:  Wataru Teramoto; Yukiomi Nozoe; Kaoru Sekiyama
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Cutaneous stimulation of the digits and lips evokes responses with different adaptation patterns in primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Mihai Popescu; Steven Barlow; Elena-Anda Popescu; Meredith E Estep; Lalit Venkatesan; Edward T Auer; William M Brooks
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 6.556

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.