Literature DB >> 32246258

Microbial Co-Occurrence in Floral Nectar Affects Metabolites and Attractiveness to a Generalist Pollinator.

Caitlin C Rering1, Rachel L Vannette2, Robert N Schaeffer2,3, John J Beck4.   

Abstract

Microbial metabolism can shape cues important for animal attraction in service-resource mutualisms. Resources are frequently colonized by microbial communities, but experimental assessment of animal-microbial interactions often focus on microbial monocultures. Such an approach likely fails to predict effects of microbial assemblages, as microbe-microbe interactions may affect in a non-additive manner microbial metabolism and resulting chemosensory cues. Here, we compared effects of microbial mono- and cocultures on growth of constituent microbes, volatile metabolite production, sugar catabolism, and effects on pollinator foraging across two nectar environments that differed in sugar concentration. Growth in co-culture decreased the abundance of the yeast Metschnikowia reukaufii, but not the bacterium Asaia astilbes. Volatile emissions differed significantly between microbial treatments and with nectar concentration, while sugar concentration was relatively similar among mono- and cocultures. Coculture volatile emission closely resembled an additive combination of monoculture volatiles. Despite differences in microbial growth and chemosensory cues, honey bee feeding did not differ between microbial monocultures and assemblages. Taken together, our results suggest that in some cases, chemical and ecological effects of microbial assemblages are largely predictable from those of component species, but caution that more work is necessary to predict under what circumstances non-additive effects are important.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apis mellifera; Gustation; MVOC; Nectar microbes; Olfaction; Phytobiome; Pollination; Volatile organic compounds

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32246258     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-020-01169-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  5 in total

1.  Nectar-Inhabiting Bacteria Affect Olfactory Responses of an Insect Parasitoid by Altering Nectar Odors.

Authors:  Antonino Cusumano; Patrizia Bella; Ezio Peri; Michael Rostás; Salvatore Guarino; Bart Lievens; Stefano Colazza
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 4.192

Review 2.  Potential effects of nectar microbes on pollinator health.

Authors:  Valerie N Martin; Robert N Schaeffer; Tadashi Fukami
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.671

3.  Microbial Volatile Organic Compounds from Tempered and Incubated Grain Mediate Attraction by a Primary but Not Secondary Stored Product Insect Pest in Wheat.

Authors:  Taylor Van Winkle; Marco Ponce; Hannah Quellhorst; Alexander Bruce; Chloe E Albin; Tania N Kim; Kun Yan Zhu; William R Morrison
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 2.793

4.  Bowel Movement: Integrating Host Mobility and Microbial Transmission Across Host Taxa.

Authors:  Arne Weinhold
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Elevated Temperature May Affect Nectar Microbes, Nectar Sugars, and Bumble Bee Foraging Preference.

Authors:  Kaleigh A Russell; Quinn S McFrederick
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.192

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.