Literature DB >> 32245339

Initial Validation of the Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury.

Jared A Rowland1,2,3, Sarah L Martindale1,2,4, Robert D Shura1,2,5, Holly M Miskey1,2,5, James R Bateman1,2,5, Erica L Epstein1,2,5, Mark J Stern1,2, Robin A Hurley1,2,6,7, Katherine H Taber1,2,7,8.   

Abstract

With the increasing prevalence of traumatic brain injury (TBI), the need for reliable and valid methods to evaluate TBI has also increased. The purpose of this study was to establish the validity and reliability of a new comprehensive assessment of TBI, the Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC) Assessment of TBI (MMA-TBI). The participants in this study were post-deployment, combat exposed veterans. First, MMA-TBI outcomes were compared with those of independently conducted clinical TBI assessments. Next, MMA-TBI outcomes were compared with those of a different validated TBI measure (the Ohio State University TBI Identification method [OSU-TBI-ID]). Next, four TBI subject matter experts independently evaluated 64 potential TBI events based on both clinical judgment and Veterans Administration/Department of Defense (VA/DoD) Clinical Practice Guidelines. Results of the MMA-TBI algorithm (based on VA/DoD clinical guideline) were compared with those of the subject matter experts. Diagnostic correspondence with independently conducted expert clinical evaluation was 96% for lifetime TBI and 92% for deployment-acquired TBI. Consistency between the MMA-TBI and the OSU-TBI-ID was high (κ = 0.90; Kendall Tau = 0.94). Comparison of MMA-TBI algorithm results with those of subject matter experts was high (κ = 0.97-1.00). The MMA-TBI is the first TBI interview to be validated against an independently conducted clinical TBI assessment. Overall, results demonstrate the MMA-TBI is a highly valid and reliable instrument for determining TBI based on VA/DoD clinical guidelines. These results support the need for application of standardized TBI criteria across all diagnostic contexts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TBI; concussion; deployment; structured interview; veteran

Year:  2020        PMID: 32245339     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2019.6972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  5 in total

1.  Influence of blast exposure on cognitive functioning in combat veterans.

Authors:  Sarah L Martindale; Anna S Ord; Jared A Rowland
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Alterations in the Topology of Functional Connectomes Are Associated with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Blast-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Combat Veterans.

Authors:  Jared A Rowland; Jennifer R Stapleton-Kotloski; Sarah L Martindale; Emily E Rogers; Anna S Ord; Dwayne W Godwin; Katherine H Taber
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Factors associated with recovery from posttraumatic stress disorder in combat veterans: The role of deployment mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).

Authors:  Anna S Ord; Erica L Epstein; Elizabeth R Shull; Katherine H Taber; Sarah L Martindale; Jared A Rowland
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2022-04-14

4.  Performance validity and symptom validity tests: Are they measuring different constructs?

Authors:  Anna S Ord; Robert D Shura; Ashley R Sansone; Sarah L Martindale; Katherine H Taber; Jared A Rowland
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Differential effects of deployment and nondeployment mild TBI on neuropsychological outcomes.

Authors:  Sarah L Martindale; Anna S Ord; Sagar S Lad; Holly M Miskey; Katherine H Taber; Jared A Rowland
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2020-12-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.