Literature DB >> 32245330

Investigational non-JAK inhibitors for chronic phase myelofibrosis.

Aniket Bankar1, Vikas Gupta1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patients with myelofibrosis (MF) have no effective treatment option after the failure of approved JAK inhibitor (JAKi) therapy. Non-JAK inhibitors (non-JAKi) that target non-canonical molecular pathways are undergoing clinical evaluations to optimize efficacy and/or to reduce hematological toxicity of JAKi. AREA COVERED: This article reviews the efficacy data from completed and ongoing early phase clinical trials of non-JAKi agents for chronic phase MF. The article also illuminates some of the challenges of myelofibrosis drug development. EXPERT OPINION: Most non-JAKi agents tested so far have shown modest benefit in improving the efficacy of ruxolitinib. Several novel agents such as BET inhibitor- CPI-0610, activin receptor ligand trap- luspatercept, recombinant pentraxin-PRM-151, telomerase inhibitor- imetelstat and bcl-2 inhibitor- navitoclax, have shown promising activity; however, they require vigorous evaluation in randomized controlled trials to understand the clinical benefit. Drugs that target new molecular pathways (MDM2, p-selectin, TIM-3, TGF-β, aurora kinase) and immune-based strategies (CALR vaccine, anti-PD-1, allogeneic cord blood regulatory T cells) are in early phase trials. Further translational studies to target leukemic stem cells, improvement in trial designs by incorporating control arm and survival endpoints, and patient-focused collaborations among all stakeholders could pave a way for future success in MF drug development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  JAK inhibitors; Myelofibrosis; chronic phase myelofibrosis; clinical trial; investigational drug; non-jak inhibitors; philadelphia negative myeloproliferative neoplasms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32245330     DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2020.1751121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs        ISSN: 1354-3784            Impact factor:   6.206


  5 in total

Review 1.  Novel therapies vs hematopoietic cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: who, when, how?

Authors:  James England; Vikas Gupta
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

Review 2.  Targeting Abnormal Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Classical Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Authors:  Yammy Yung; Emily Lee; Hiu-Tung Chu; Pui-Kwan Yip; Harinder Gill
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  BRD4-mediated repression of p53 is a target for combination therapy in AML.

Authors:  Anne-Louise Latif; Ashley Newcombe; Sha Li; Kathryn Gilroy; Neil A Robertson; Xue Lei; Helen J S Stewart; John Cole; Maria Terradas Terradas; Loveena Rishi; Lynn McGarry; Claire McKeeve; Claire Reid; William Clark; Joana Campos; Kristina Kirschner; Andrew Davis; Jonathan Lopez; Jun-Ichi Sakamaki; Jennifer P Morton; Kevin M Ryan; Stephen W G Tait; Sheela A Abraham; Tessa Holyoake; Brian Higgins; Xu Huang; Karen Blyth; Mhairi Copland; Timothy J T Chevassut; Karen Keeshan; Peter D Adams
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 4.  Persistence of myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib: biology and clinical implications.

Authors:  David M Ross; Jeffrey J Babon; Denis Tvorogov; Daniel Thomas
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 5.  Defining disease modification in myelofibrosis in the era of targeted therapy.

Authors:  Naveen Pemmaraju; Srdan Verstovsek; Ruben Mesa; Vikas Gupta; Jacqueline S Garcia; Joseph M Scandura; Stephen T Oh; Francesco Passamonti; Konstanze Döhner; Adam J Mead
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.921

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.