| Literature DB >> 32244963 |
Alessandro Ciccola1, Ilaria Serafini1, Francesca Ripanti2, Flaminia Vincenti1, Francesca Coletti3,4, Armandodoriano Bianco1, Claudia Fasolato5, Camilla Montesano1, Marco Galli3, Roberta Curini1, Paolo Postorino2.
Abstract
Vesuvius eruption that destroyed Pompeii in AD 79 represents one of the most important events in history. The cataclysm left behind an abundance of archeological evidence representing a fundamental source of the knowledge we have about ancient Roman material culture and technology. A great number of textiles have been preserved, rarely maintaining traces of their original color, since they are mainly in the mineralized and carbonized state. However, one outstanding textile sample displays a brilliant purple color and traces of gold strips. Since the purple was one of the most exclusive dyes in antiquity, its presence in an important commercial site like Pompeii induces us to deepen the knowledge of such artifacts and provide further information on their history. For this reason, the characterization of the purple color was the main scope of this research, and to deepen the knowledge of such artifacts, the SERS (Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering) in solution approach was applied. Then, these data were enriched by HPLC-HRMS analyses, which confirmed SERS-based hypotheses and also allowed to hypothesize the species of the origin mollusk. In this context, a step-by-step integrated approach resulted fundamental to maximize the information content and to provide new data on textile manufacturing and trade in antiquity.Entities:
Keywords: HPLC-HRMS; Pompeii; SERS; Tyrian purple; cultural heritage; mineralized textiles; orbitrap; shellfish purple
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32244963 PMCID: PMC7144399 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25061417
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1(a) The analyzed sample; (b) Mineralized structure of a textile with purple dye remains; (c) Purple dye and gold strip evidence; (d) A purple area on the surface of the sample.
Figure 2(a) SEM evidence of alteration of morphology of the sample’s fibers; (b) Presence of crystals with characteristic gypsum structures on altered fibers; (c) Stereo microscope image evidencing the z-twist feature (black circle).
Figure 3Raman and SERS spectra: results and literature references. Top panel: (a) the Raman spectrum acquired on the colored area of the archeological sample and (b) the SERS spectrum of the DMF extract from the sample; (c) the SERS spectrum of DMF is displayed for reference. Central panel: (d) Raman reference spectra of 6-monobromoindigotin (ref. [36], excitation laser line: 785 nm); (e) 6,6’-dibromoindigotin (ref. [35], excitation laser line: 633 nm); (f) indigotin (ref. [35], excitation laser line: 633 nm); (g) indirubin (ref. [40], excitation laser line: 532 nm). Bottom panel: (h) the SERS reference spectrum of the DMF extract of indigo acquired using the Lee–Meisel Ag colloid as a SERS substrate [39].
Comparison of the main peaks in the Raman spectrum of the sample with the literature ones for indigotin (IND, [35]), indirubin (INR, [40]), 6-bromoindigotin (MBI, [36]) and 6,6’-dibromoindigotin (DBI, [35]) together with their relative tentative assignations based on the literature.
| Assignation | Sample | IND | INR | MBI | DBI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δ(C=C), δ(C=O) | 210 | ||||
| ρ(CH), γ(C=C)2 | 251 | 254 | |||
| γ(C-C=C) | 274 | 266 | 267 | ||
| γ(CC), ν(C=O), ν(CBr) | 309 | 304 | 306 | ||
| γ(CC), ν(CBr) | 364 | ||||
| γ(CC) | 387 | 386 | |||
| 468 | 466 | 471 | 466 | ||
| δ(C=C-CO-C) | 496 | ||||
| ρ(CH), ρ(NH) | 519 | 516 | |||
| δ(CC), δ(CH), δ(NH) | 532 | ||||
| ρ(CH), ρ(CO) | 553 | 545 | 554 | ||
| δ(C=O), δ(CNHC) | 578 | 584 | 574 | ||
| δ(C=O), ν(CC-C-C-CN) | 602 | 599 | |||
| ν(C-C-C), ν(CC-CO-CC) | 619 | ||||
| γ(NH) | 630 | 629 | |||
| δ(CC), δ(CH), δ(NH) | 631 | ||||
| δ(CC), ρ(CH), ρ(CO | 674 | 680 | 682 | ||
| δ(CH), δ(NCC) | 691 | 692 | |||
| ν(HN-CC-CO) | 712 | 716 | |||
| δ(CH), δ(NCC) | 760 | 762 | 750 | 757 | |
| γ(CH), δ(CC) ring, ν(CC), ν(CN) | 868 | ||||
| γ(CH), ν(CC), ν(CN) | 893 | 894 | 896 | ||
| δ(CH), ρ(CH) | 935 | 940 | 940 | 937 | |
| δ(CC), δ(CH) | 962 | ||||
| ν(CC), δ(CC) | 1015 | 1013 | 1006 | 1011 | |
| ν(CC), γ(CH) | 1046 | 1048 | |||
| δ(CH) | 1096 | 1097 | 1125 | ||
| δ(CC), | 1135 | ||||
| 1148 | 1161 | ||||
| 1217 | 1224 | 1214 | 1219 | 1211 | |
| ν(CC), δ(CH), δ(C=O) | 1255 | 1250 | 1244 | 1252 | |
| δ(CH), δ(NH), ν(CC) | 1273 | ||||
| ν(CC), ρ(NH-C=C-NH) | 1306 | 1310 | 1308 | 1301 | |
| 1316 | 1317 | 1316 | |||
| ρ(NH-C=C-NH) | 1340 | 1337 | |||
| δ(NH), δ(CH), ρ(CH) | 1350 | 1354 | |||
| 1368 | 1364 | 1362 | 1364 | ||
| 1446 | 1460 | 1441 | 1446 | ||
| 1462 | 1462 | 1479 | 1461 | ||
| ν(C=C) | 1573 | ||||
| 1583 | 1581 | 1587 | 1580 | 1582 | |
| 1613 | 1634 | ||||
| ν(C=O), | 1628 | 1628 | 1625 | 1625 | |
| ν(C=C) | 1659 | 1657 | |||
| ν(C=O), ν(C=C) | 1702 | 1701 | 1700 | 1700 |
Figure 4HPLC-HRMS chromatograms relative to non-brominated (top), monobrominated (middle), and dibrominated (bottom) indigoids in the sample DMSO extract.