| Literature DB >> 32244627 |
Jun-Bin Huang1, Jagabandhu Patra2,3, Ming-Hsien Lin1, Ming-Der Ger1, Yih-Ming Liu1, Nen-Wen Pu4, Chien-Te Hsieh5, Meng-Jey Youh6, Quan-Feng Dong7, Jeng-Kuei Chang2,3.
Abstract
We demonstrate a facile and effective method, which is low-cost and easy to scale up, to fabricate holey graphene nanosheets (HGNSs) via ultrafast heating during synthesis. Various heating temperatures are used to modify the material properties of HGNSs. First, we use HGNSs as the electrode active materials for electric double-layer capacitors (EDLCs). A synthesis temperature of 900 °C seems to be optimal, i.e., the conductivity and adhesion of HGNSs reach a compromise. The gravimetric capacitance of this HGNS sample (namely HGNS-900) is 56 F·g-1. However, the volumetric capacitance is low, which hinders its practical application. Secondly, we incorporate activated carbon (AC) into HGNS-900 to make a composite EDLC material. The effect of the AC:HGNS-900 ratio on the capacitance, high-rate performance, and cycling stability are systematically investigated. With a proper amount of HGNS-900, both the electrode gravimetric and volumetric capacitances at high rate charging/discharging are clearly higher than those of plain AC electrodes. The AC/HGNS-900 composite is a promising electrode material for nonaqueous EDLC applications.Entities:
Keywords: composite electrode; graphene nanosheets; holey structure; nonaqueous electrolyte; volumetric capacitance
Year: 2020 PMID: 32244627 PMCID: PMC7240531 DOI: 10.3390/polym12040765
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1SEM micrographs of (a) HGNS-300; (b) HGNS-700; (c) HGNS-900; and (d) HGNS-1100 samples.
Figure 2(a) XRD pattern; (b) Raman spectra; and (c) XPS spectra of various samples.
Raman ID/IG ratio and chemical compositions of various HGNS samples evaluated using an elemental analyzer.
| Sample | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| HGNS-300 | 1.01 | 83.7 | 16.3 |
| HGNS-700 | 1.02 | 88.5 | 11.5 |
| HGNS-900 | 1.07 | 96.0 | 4.0 |
| HGNS-1100 | 1.18 | 97.8 | 2.2 |
Figure 3(a) CV curves of various HGNS cells measured at a potential sweep rate of 50 mV·s−1; (b) Galvanostatic charge–discharge curves of various HGNS cells measured at 5 A·g−1; (c) EIS Nyquists plots of various HGNS cells.
Figure 4Low-magnification SEM images of (a) AC/HGNS-900 (20:1); (b) AC/HGNS-900 (10:1); and (c) AC/HGNS-900 (5:1) electrodes. High-magnification SEM images of (d) AC/HGNS-900 (20:1); (e) AC/HGNS-900 (10:1); and (f) AC/HGNS-900 (5:1) electrodes.
Figure 5(a) N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms and (b) pore size distribution data of various electrode coating layers.
Figure 6(a) CV curves of various cells measured at potential sweep rate of 50 mV·s−1; (b) Galvanostatic charge–discharge curves of various cells measured at 5 A·g−1; (c) Specific capacitances of various electrodes at different current densities; (d) EIS Nyquists plots and (e) cycling stability data of various cells.
Film densities, gravimetric capacitances, and volumetric capacitances of various AC/HGNS electrodes.
| Sample | Thickness (μm) | Film Density | Current Density | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 A·g−1 | 20 A·g−1 | 1 A·g−1 | 20 A·g−1 | |||
| Gravimetric Capacitance (F·g−1) | Volumetric | |||||
| AC | 32 | 0.333 | 87 | 12 | 29.0 | 4.0 |
| AC/HGNS-900 (20:1) | 32 | 0.322 | 89 | 28 | 28.7 | 9.0 |
| AC/HGNS-900 (10:1) | 32 | 0.312 | 72 | 33 | 22.5 | 10.3 |
| AC/HGNS-900 (5:1) | 32 | 0.260 | 57 | 18 | 14.8 | 4.7 |