| Literature DB >> 32244592 |
Jr-Yi Wang1,2, Chun-Ying Cheng3,4, Alvin Chao-Yu Chen3,4, Yi-Sheng Chan3,4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to present the results of arthroscopy-assisted corrective osteotomy (AACO), reduction, internal fixation, and strut allograft augmentation for tibial plateau malunion or nonunion.Entities:
Keywords: Arthroscopy-assisted corrective osteotomy; tibial plateau malunion; tibial plateau nonunion
Year: 2020 PMID: 32244592 PMCID: PMC7230929 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9040973
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Demographics of surgical patients: Schatzker classification of fracture types and associated soft-tissue injuries.
| Type II | Type III | Type IV | Type V | Type VI | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients (%) | 19 (32.7%) | 2 (3.4%) | 7 (12%) | 20 (34.5%) | 10 (17.2%) | 58 (100%) |
| Mean age (yr) | 49.8 ± 12.9 | 34 ± 16.9 | 49.3 ± 7.2 | 49.5 ± 13.4 | 49.2 ± 8.3 | 49 ± 11.9 |
| Gender (M/F) | 5/14 | 0/2 | 1/6 | 6/14 | 4/6 | 16/42 |
| Side (R/L) | 7/12 | 0/2 | 0/7 | 9/11 | 7/3 | 23/35 |
|
| ||||||
| Range of motion | 1.3 ± 3.3~102.3 ± 30.6 | 0.0 ± 0.0~110.0 ± 28.3 | 3.6 ± 6.3~115.0 ± 15.0 | 4.0 ± 7.7~93.7 ± 27.9 | 12.5 ± 16.2~84.0 ± 28.6 | 4.4 ± 9.18~98.0 ± 28.5 |
| Mean depression plateau (mm) | 15.9 ± 6.2 | 7.5 ± 3.53 | 16.4 ± 3.77 | 19.5 ± 7.7 | 20.7 ± 5.6 | 17.7 ± 6.8 |
| Mean tibiofemoral angle | 7.3 ± 3.3 | 8.0 ± 2.8 | −2.4 ± 5.44 | −1.5 ± 9.6 | 0.4 ± 7.6 | - |
|
| ||||||
| Range of motion (latest follow up) | 1.1 ± 3.1~111.6 ± 22.4 | 0.0 ± 0.0~130.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0~122.8 ± 7.6 | 1.3 ± 3.9~112.3 ± 17.0 | 4.5 ± 6.0~105.0 ± 19.0 | 1.5 ± 4.0~112.7 ± 18.8 |
| Mean depression plateau (mm) | 2.8 ± 3.6 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 2.7 ± 4.0 | 5.1 ± 4.9 | 5.5 ± 3.4 | 3.9 ± 4.2 |
| Mean tibiofemoral angle | 6.7 ± 5.7 | 6.0 ± 0.0 | 4.6 ± 4.3 | 3.4 ± 9.3 | 1.0 ± 7.5 | - |
|
| ||||||
| High grade chondral injury | 11(57.9%) | 0 | 2 (28.6%) | 9 (45%) | 6 (60%) | 28 (48.3%) |
| Meniscus (%) | 10 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 26 (44.8%) |
| ACL (%) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 8 (13.8%) |
| PCL (%) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 (8.6%) |
| MCL (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 (1.7%) |
| Frequency of patients involved (%) | 52.6% (10/19) | 50% | 57.1% (4/7) | 55.5% (11/20) | 50% (5/10) | 53.4% (31/58) |
ACL: anterior cruciate ligament, PCL: posterior cruciate ligament; MCL: medial collateral ligament.
Figure 1Operative procedure: (A) Arthroscopic documentation and debridement. (B) Use of a microfracture awl to identify the intra-articular depression zone. (C) Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tibial guiding for osteotomy axis and location, where two parallel Kirschner wire determined one plane, the 5 mm osteotome started from the metaphysic area to the articular surface. (D) The malunited fracture area was completely released. (E) The depressed articular fragments were elevated with bone tamp under direct arthroscopically inspection. (F) Bone grafting of the metaphyseal defect with structural allograft femoral head.
Criteria for clinical assessment.
| Clinical Parameter | Points | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjective | |||||
| Pain | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | |
| None | 6 | ||||
| Occasional pain, needs no medication | 5 | ||||
| Stabbing pain | 4 | ||||
| Intense, activity-related | 2 | ||||
| Night pain, at rest | 0 | ||||
| Walking capacity | 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 | |
| Normal | 6 | ||||
| Outdoors >1 h | 4 | ||||
| Outdoors >15 min | 2 | ||||
| Indoors only | 1 | ||||
| Wheelchair/bedridden | 0 | ||||
| Objective | |||||
| Extension | 6 | 4 | 2 | 2 | |
| Normal | 6 | ||||
| <10° loss | 4 | ||||
| >10° loss | 2 | ||||
| Total range of motion | 5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | |
| >140° | 6 | ||||
| >120° | 5 | ||||
| >90° | 4 | ||||
| >60° | 2 | ||||
| >30° | 1 | ||||
| 0° | 0 | ||||
| Stability | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | |
| Normal | 6 | ||||
| Abnormal in 20° flexion | 5 | ||||
| Instability in extension <10° | 4 | ||||
| Instability in extension >10° | 2 | ||||
| Total (minimum) | 30–27 | 26–20 | 19–10 | 9–6 | |
Criteria for radiologic assessment.
| Radiological Parameter | Points | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depression | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | |
| None | 6 | ||||
| <6 mm | 4 | ||||
| 6–10 mm | 2 | ||||
| >10 mm | 0 | ||||
| Condylar widening | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | |
| None | 6 | ||||
| <6 mm | 4 | ||||
| 6–10 mm | 2 | ||||
| >10 mm | 0 | ||||
| Angulation (valgus/varus) | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | |
| Normal | 6 | ||||
| <10° | 4 | ||||
| 10°–20° | 2 | ||||
| >20° | 0 | ||||
| Total (minimum) | 18 | 17–12 | 11–6 | 5–0 |
Figure 2(A,B) This 43-year-old patient had a Type II fracture, where open reduction with internal fixation was done by two cannulated screws on the day of injury. This radiograph was checked four months after the initial surgery, where a lateral split with depression was noted. (C,D) CT revealed lateral plateau huge intraarticular split and depression. (E,F) Immediate postoperative radiograph after arthroscopically-assisted corrective osteotomy (AACO), bone grafting with structural allograft femoral head, and internal fixation by lateral plate. (G,H) 4 years after AACO, the plate was removed and the radiological score were excellent.
Figure 3(A,B) This 57-year-old patient had a Type II fracture, where open reduction with internal fixation was done by medial locking plate 3 days after injury. When this radiograph was checked 14 months after the initial surgery, lateral plateau depression and widening were noted. (C,D) CT revealed lateral plateau huge intraarticular depression. (E,F) 2.5 years after AACO, the radiological score was excellent.
Results of clinical assessment in 58 patients.
| Fracture Type | No. of Patients | Average Clinical Score | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type II | 19 | 22.6 ± 5.3 | 4 (21%) | 10 (52.6%) | 5 (26.3%) | None | 73.7% |
| Type III | 2 | 26.0 ± 0.0 | None | 2 (100%) | None | None | 100% |
| Type IV | 7 | 25.3 ± 1.4 | 1 (14.3%) | 6 (85.7%) | None | None | 100% |
| Type V | 20 | 23.6 ± 4.0 | 1 (5%) | 17 (85%) | 1 (5%) | 1(5%) | 90% |
| Type VI | 10 | 21.6 ± 5.2 | 1 (10%) | 5 (50%) | 4 (40%) | None | 60% |
| Total Injuries | 58 | 23.2 ± 4.5 | 7(12%) | 40(68.9%) | 10(17.2%) | 1(1.7%) | 47(81%) |
Results of radiological assessment in 25 patients.
| Fracture Type | No. of Patients | Average Radiological Score | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type IV | 5 | 16 (range: 14–18) | 3 (60%) | 2 (40%) | None | None | 100% |
| Type V | 2 | 16.5 (range: 14–18) | 1 (50%) | 1 (50%) | None | None | 100% |
| Type VI | 18 | 15 (range: 10–18) | 9 (34%) | 8 (44%) | 1 (22%) | None | 94% |
| Total Injuries | 25 | 15.8 | 13 (52%) | 11 (44%) | 1 (4%) | None | 96% (24/25) |