| Literature DB >> 32244455 |
Mingsong Chen1, Yi Zhang1, Yue Li1, Sheldon Q Shi2, Jianzhang Li1, Qiang Gao1, Hongwu Guo1.
Abstract
Bio-based adhesives have low water resistance and they are less durable than synthetic adhesives, which limits their exterior applications. In this study, a bio adhesive was developed from soybean meal and larch tannin that was designed for exterior use. Phenol hydroxymethylated tannin oligomer (PHTO) was synthesized and then mixed with soybean meal flour in order to obtain a soybean meal-based adhesive (SPA). The results showed that the moisture absorption rate, residual rate, and solid content of SPA with 10 wt % PHTO (mass ratio with respect to the entire adhesive) were improved by 22.8%, 11.6%, and 6.8%, respectively, as compared with that of pure SPA. The wet shear strength of plywood with SPA with 10 wt % PHTO (boiling in 100 °C water for 3 h) was 1.04 MPa when compared with 0 MPa of pure SPA. This met the bond strength requirement of exterior-use plywood (GB/T 9846.3-2004). This improved adhesive performance was mainly due to the formation of a crosslinked structure between the PHTO and the protein and also PHTO self-crosslinking. The formaldehyde emission of the resulting plywood was the same as that of solid wood. The PHTO-modified SPA can potentially extend the applications of SPAs from interior to exterior plywood.Entities:
Keywords: bond strength; exterior use; plywood; soybean meal adhesive; tannin
Year: 2020 PMID: 32244455 PMCID: PMC7240477 DOI: 10.3390/polym12040758
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
The physical properties of phenol hydroxymethylated tannin oligomer (PHTO) sample.
| Sample | Viscosity (mPa·s) | Solid Content | pH Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| PHTO | 287,700 (±980) | 52.7% (±0.3%) | 10.3 (±0.2) |
Standard deviation.
Figure 1Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra and the proposed reaction of larch tannin (LT) and phenolic hydroxymethylated tannin oligomer (PHTO).
Figure 2Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) curves and their differential curves of the different adhesives: 1 (pure SM adhesive), 2 (5 wt % PHTO/SPA), 3 (10 wt % PHTO/SPA), 4 (15 wt % PHTO/SPA), and 5 (20 wt % PHTO/SPA).
Scheme 1The reaction process of the PHTO and soy protein.
The physical properties of the different adhesives.
| Adhesives | pH | Residual Rate (%) | Viscosity (mPa·s) | Solid Content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.2 (0.1) | 79.9 (0.2) | 18,560 (1250) | 26.6 (0.2) |
| 2 | 9.4 (0.2) | 81.1 (0.1) | 125,600 (23100) | 27.6 (0.3) |
| 3 | 9.7 (0.1) | 89.2 (0.3) | 297,800 (12400) | 28.4 (0.1) |
| 4 | 9.8 (0.1) | 81.9 (0.2) | 303,600 (9800) | 28.9 (0.3) |
| 5 | 10.1 (0.2) | 71.7 (0.4) | 783,400 (37600) | 29.6 (0.1) |
a Standard deviation. Adhesive samples: 1 (pure SM adhesive), 2 (5 wt % PHTO/SPA), 3 (10 wt % PHTO/SPA), 4 (15 wt % PHTO/SPA), and 5 (20 wt % PHTO/SPA).
Figure 3SEM images and moisture absorption measurements of the different adhesives: 1 (pure SM adhesive), 2 (5 wt % PHTO/SPA), 3 (10 wt % PHTO/SPA), 4 (15 wt % PHTO/SPA), and 5 (20 wt % PHTO/SPA), (* represents the moisture absorption value of different samples).
Figure 4The wet shear strength and formaldehyde emission of plywood samples bonded with different adhesives (1 (pure SM adhesive), 2 (5 wt % PHTO/SPA), 3 (10 wt % PHTO/SPA), 4 (15 wt % PHTO/SPA), and 5 (20 wt % PHTO/SPA)).