| Literature DB >> 32244443 |
Agnieszka Suder1, Paweł Jagielski2, Beata Piórecka2, Małgorzata Płonka1, Karol Makiel1, Matylda Siwek3, Iwona Wronka4, Mariusz Janusz5.
Abstract
A lot of attention has been focused on obesity, however, the other extreme-thinness-may lead to inhibition of physical and intellectual development. The aim was to assess the prevalence of thinness and determine the associated factors in children from rural populations. We used data from the cross-sectional sample of 3048 children, examined in schools from a district in southern Poland. The sample included 89% of the district departments, and included a proportion of rural and small town populations-a representative one for the region. Thinness was determined based on the criteria proposed by Cole and Lobstein. Biological, sociodemographic and lifestyle factors were analysed. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using logistic regression analysis. The prevalence of thinness was 11.5% in boys and 13.5% in girls. In the younger group, it was similar in boys and girls at 11.8%; whereas in the older group, it was 11.1% and 14.5%, respectively. The prevalence of thinness Grade 3 in girls was two times higher than in boys. The increased index of leisure time physical activity was connected with thinness in prepubertal boys. The mechanism determining the development of thinness is very complex and further exploration of this trend is recommended.Entities:
Keywords: BMI; physical activity; risk factors
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32244443 PMCID: PMC7177838 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17072368
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Statistical characteristics of height (Ht), weight (Wt) and body mass index (BMI) in rural boys and girls.
| Age | Ht (mm) | Wt (kg) | BMI | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n |
| SD | Me | Min | Max |
| SD | Me | Min | Max |
| SD | Me | Min | Max | |
| Boys | ||||||||||||||||
| 7.0 | 110 | 1256.9 | 54.3 | 1256.5 | 1119.0 | 1378.0 | 25.8 | 5.3 | 24.6 | 18.0 | 42.0 | 16.1 | 2.5 | 15.6 | 11.3 | 24.2 |
| 8.0 | 302 | 1297.2 * | 58.8 | 1294.0 | 1131.0 | 1503.0 | 27.8 | 5.9 | 26.5 | 11.7 | 57.7 | 16.4 | 2.3 | 15.9 | 12.4 | 27.6 |
| 9.0 | 299 | 1357.7 * | 60.5 | 1356.0 | 1210.0 | 1505.0 | 32.1 | 6.5 | 31.0 | 20.0 | 55.0 | 17.4 | 2.8 | 16.7 | 12.8 | 26.4 |
| 10.0 | 306 | 1405.7 | 63.8 | 1399.0 | 1199.0 | 1611.0 | 35.4 | 8.6 | 33.3 | 21.9 | 70.3 | 17.6 | 3.2 | 16.7 | 11.9 | 29.1 |
| 11.0 | 257 | 1457.4 | 64.4 | 1455.0 | 1299.0 | 1698.0 | 38.4 | 8.3 | 36.7 | 22.1 | 71.3 | 18.0 | 2.9 | 17.1 | 12.9 | 27.4 |
| 12.0 | 227 | 1515.2 | 69.9 | 1510.0 | 1308.0 | 1693.0 | 43.9 * | 11.4 | 41.2 | 25.9 | 88.0 | 18.9 ** | 3.9 | 17.9 | 13.0 | 36.8 |
| Girls | ||||||||||||||||
| 7.0 | 121 | 1239.7 | 59.3 | 12420 | 1095.0 | 1395.0 | 25.0 | 5.8 | 24.0 | 14.8 | 54.5 | 16.2 | 2.6 | 15.9 | 12.1 | 28.0 |
| 8.0 | 306 | 1285.7 | 58.2 | 1285.0 | 1116.0 | 1425.0 | 27.3 | 5.2 | 26.4 | 16.0 | 44.9 | 16.4 | 2.4 | 15.9 | 8.0 | 23.7 |
| 9.0 | 274 | 1338.8 | 58.3 | 1340.0 | 1200.0 | 1521.0 | 31.5 | 7.7 | 29.6 | 18.1 | 70.6 | 17.3 | 3.2 | 16.6 | 11.5 | 30.5 |
| 10.0 | 303 | 1404.0 | 65.0 | 1406.0 | 1216.0 | 1620.0 | 34.7 | 7.7 | 33.4 | 21.3 | 64.6 | 17.6 | 2.9 | 17.0 | 11.2 | 28.3 |
| 11.0 | 308 | 1460.0 | 69.5 | 1458.0 | 1256.0 | 1666.0 | 38.2 | 8.7 | 36.6 | 23.4 | 76.8 | 17.7 | 3.1 | 17.0 | 9.3 | 31.2 |
| 12.0 | 254 | 1515.5 | 62.3 | 15220 | 1308.0 | 1673.0 | 42.6 | 9.3 | 41.7 | 25.7 | 80.7 | 18.4 | 3.1 | 17.8 | 12.9 | 30.1 |
n, sample size; , mean; SD, standard deviation; Me, median; Min, minimum; Max, maximum; The boys’ mean measurement significantly different from girls’ at p < 0.05 * test t; ** Mann–Whitney test.
The category of thinness in rural boys and girls.
| Boys | Girls | Boys and Girls | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI category | n | % | n | % | n | % |
| Thinness Grade 1 | 141 | 9.4 | 160 | 10.2 | 301 | 9.8 |
| Thinness Grade 2 | 25 | 1.7 | 35 | 2.3 | 60 | 2.0 |
| Thinness Grade 3 | 6 | 0.4 | 13 | 0.8 | 19 | 0.6 |
| Thinness all grades | 172 | 11.5 | 208 | 13.3 | 380 | 12.4 |
Thinness Grade 1, 2 and 3 correspond to the BMI 17 to <18.5, 16 to <17 and <16 kg/m2 at the age of 18 years, respectively, (Cole and Lobstein [21]).
The prevalence of thinness in rural boys and girls according to age category.
| Boys | Girls | Chi-Square Test | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | n | % | n | % |
|
| 7.0 | 21 | 19.1 | 16 | 13.2 | 0.2245 |
| 8.0 | 37 | 12.3 | 30 | 9.8 | 0.3351 |
| 9.0 | 26 | 8.7 | 37 | 13.5 | 0.0660 |
| 10.0 | 37 | 12.1 | 32 | 10.6 | 0.5513 |
| 11.0 | 23 | 8.9 | 52 | 16.9 | 0.0056 * |
| 12.0 | 28 | 12.3 | 41 | 16.1 | 0.2344 |
| 7–9 | 84 | 11.8 | 83 | 11.8 | 0.9879 |
| 10–12 | 88 | 11.1 | 125 | 14.5 | 0.0444 * |
| Total | 172 | 11.5 | 208 | 13.3 | 0.1255 |
* Frequencies of boys significantly different from the frequencies of girls at p < 0.05 (chi-square test).
Factors associated with thinness (BMI) in rural boys and girls.
| Variables | Category | % | BMI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boys | Girls | ||||||
| Boys | Girls | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | ||
| Child’s age | 7–9 | 46.4 | 44.7 | 1.00 | 0.69–1.32 | 1.00 | 0.88–1.61 |
| 10–12 | 53.6 | 55.3 | 0.95 | 1.19 | |||
| Place of residence | small town | 28.8 | 26.3 | 1.00 | 0.81–1.75 | 1.00 | 0.66–1.32 |
| rural department | 71.2 | 73.7 | 1.19 | 0.94 | |||
| Father’s education | low | 75.7 | 74.3 | 1.00 | 0.59–1.45 | 1.00 | 0.64–1.48 |
| high | 24.3 | 25.7 | 0.93 | 0.97 | |||
| Mother’s education | low | 58.4 | 59.6 | 1.00 | 0.81–1.94 | 1.00 | 0.68–1.49 |
| high | 41.6 | 41.3 | 1.25 | 1.07 | |||
| Vegetables consumption (≤4 days a week) | no | 26.6 | 28.9 | 1.00 | 0.59–1.88 | 1.00 | 0.76–1.96 |
| yes | 73.4 | 71.1 | 1.05 | 1.22 | |||
| Fruit consumption (≤4 days a week) | no | 46.7 | 47.1 | 1.00 | 0.50–1.40 | 1.00 | 0.52–1.29 |
| yes | 53.3 | 52.9 | 0.83 | 0.82 | |||
| Sweet food consumption (>4 days a week) | no | 66.5 | 66.9 | 1.00 | 0.72–2.03 | 1.09 | 0.70–1.80 |
| yes | 33.5 | 33.1 | 1.21 | 1.12 | |||
| Regularity of breakfasts | no | 5.4 | 5.7 | 1.00 | 0.27–3.31 | 1.00 | 0.64–11.7 |
| yes | 94.6 | 94.3 | 0.94 | 2.75 | |||
| Leisure time physical activity index | low | 65.5 | 69.8 | 1.00 | 1.21–7.16 * | 1.00 | 0.57–5.68 |
| high | 34.5 | 30.2 | 2.95 | 1.80 | |||
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; * significance at p < 0.05.
The prevalence of frequency and the duration of physical activity in rural boys and girls with thinness (BMI < 18.5) and without (BMI ≥ 18.5).
| BMI < 18.5 | BMI ≥ 18.5 | Chi-Square Test | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boys | % | % |
|
| Frequency of physical activity | |||
| Up to 3 times per week | 77.3 | 64.8 | 0.0423 * |
| More than 3 times per week | 22.7 | 35.2 | |
| Duration of physical activity per day | |||
| Up to 2 h | 88.4 | 95.1 | 0.0248 * |
| More than 2 h | 11.6 | 4.9 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Frequency of physical activity per week | |||
| Up to 3 times per week | 77.6 | 71.9 | 0.8961 |
| More than 3 times per week | 27.4 | 28.1 | |
| Duration of physical activity per day | |||
| Up to 2 h | 95.2 | 97.2 | 0.3267 |
| More than 2 h | 4.8 | 2.8 |
* significance at p < 0.05 (chi-square test).