| Literature DB >> 32244366 |
Yue Bai1,2,3, Xiaorong Liu1,2,3, Sheldon Q Shi2,4, Jianzhang Li1,2,3.
Abstract
Despite the recent advances in protein-based adhesives, achieving strong adhesion and mold resistance in wet environment is challenging. Herein, a facile fabrication technology of preparing tough bio-adhesive by incorporating soybean meal and blood meal is presented. Inspired by the marine mussel byssi and brown algae, metal coordination was introduced into a loosely bound protein system to construct multiple chemical cross-linking networks. Mixed alkali-modified blood meal (mBM) was mixed with soybean meal, then 1,6-hexane dioldiglycidyl ether (HDE) and zinc ion were introduced to fabricate soybean meal and blood meal-based adhesives. The attained adhesives exhibited good thermal stability, water resistance (the wet shear strength is 1.1 MPa), and mold resistance, with appropriate solid content (34.3%) and relatively low moisture uptake (11.9%). These outstanding performances would be attributed to the reaction of 1,6-hexane dioldiglycidyl ether with protein to form a preliminary cross-linking network; subsequently, the coordination of zinc ions with amino or carboxyl strengthened and toughened the adhesive. Finally, the calcium ions gelled the adhesives, providing cohesion force and making the network structure more compact. This study realized the value-added utilization of protein co-products and developed a new eco-friendly bio-based adhesive.Entities:
Keywords: metal complexation; mold resistance; protein adhesive; soybean meal; water resistance
Year: 2020 PMID: 32244366 PMCID: PMC7240608 DOI: 10.3390/polym12040756
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Formulations of the adhesives.
| Sample | Soybean Meal (g) | Water (g) | HDE (g) | Blood Meal(g) | ZnCl2 (g) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adhesive I | formulation 1 | 25 (33 wt %) a | 50 | 2.25 (3 wt %) | - | - |
| Adhesive II | formulation 2 | 25 | 50 | 2.25 | - | 0.75 (1 wt %) |
| formulation 3 | 25 | 50 | 2.25 | - | 1.125 (1.5 wt %) | |
| formulation 4 | 25 | 50 | 2.25 | - | 1.5 (2 wt %) | |
| Adhesive III | formulation 5 | 15 (20 wt %) | 50 | 2.25 | 10 (13 wt %) | 0.75 (1 wt %) |
| formulation 6 | 15 | 50 | 2.25 | 10 | 1.125 (1.5 wt %) | |
| formulation 7 | 15 | 50 | 2.25 | 10 | 1.5 (2 wt %) |
Proportion of component to the weight of the adhesive.
Scheme 1Illustration of a mussel-algae inspired adhesive: metal ions crosslinked adhesive system (a) and HDE crosslinked network (b).
Figure 1ATR-FTIR spectra of pristine soybean meal (0) and investigated adhesives (1–7).
Figure 2X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of soybean meal, blood meal and investigated adhesives.
Figure 3DTG curves (a) and TG curves (b) of investigated adhesives.
Thermal degradation data of the investigated adhesives.
| Sample | MSI (%) | MSII (%) | MSIII (%) | Mr (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| formulation 1 | 4.70 | 17.02 | 50.90 | 27.40 | 301.43 |
| formulation 2 | 3.94 | 15.28 | 53.03 | 27.74 | 305.48 |
| formulation 3 | 3.82 | 15.40 | 52.15 | 28.63 | 305.24 |
| formulation 4 | 1.97 | 14.41 | 51.56 | 32.06 | 308.84 |
| formulation 5 | 5.01 | 11.70 | 48.90 | 34.39 | 305.97 |
| formulation 6 | 4.87 | 10.41 | 47.42 | 37.30 | 307.90 |
| formulation 7 | 3.99 | 10.38 | 46.30 | 39.32 | 307.99 |
Ms—weight loss percentage during the degradation stage; Mr—residue weight at 600 °C for different adhesive samples; Tmax—temperature of the maximum degradation rate.
Figure 4DSC curves of investigated adhesives.
Figure 5SEM images of cured adhesives.
The solid content and moisture uptake of investigated adhesives.
| Sample | Solid Content (%) | Moisture Uptake (%) |
|---|---|---|
| formulation 1 | 30.90 | 14.61 |
| formulation 2 | 32.94 | 17.84 |
| formulation 3 | 34.01 | 17.46 |
| formulation 4 | 32.00 | 20.27 |
| formulation 5 | 32.58 | 14.57 |
| formulation 6 | 34.31 | 11.86 |
| formulation 7 | 32.33 | 15.15 |
Figure 6Crack observations (a) and SEM images (b) of cured adhesives.
Figure 7The wet shear strength of plywood bonded by investigated adhesives.
Figure 8Mildewproof activities of the adhesives under different mildew treatment time.