| Literature DB >> 32244320 |
Zhangxiong Han1,2, Xuan Wei3, Dejun Wan4, Wenxiang He1, Xijie Wang2, Ying Xiong2.
Abstract
This study investigated the beneficial effect of molybdenum (Mo) application on rape plants (Brassica napus L.) grown in a soil polluted by cadmium (Cd). A pot experiment was conducted to determine how different concentrations of exogenous Mo (0, 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg) affect plant physiology, biomass, photosynthesis, cation uptake, and Cd translocation and enrichment in rape plants under Cd stress (0.5 and 6.0 mg/kg). Under single Cd treatment, plant physiological and biochemical parameters, biomass parameters, leaf chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, and macroelement uptake of rape plants decreased, while their malonaldehyde content, proline content, non-photochemical quenching coefficient, and Cd uptake significantly increased, compared to those of the control group (p-values < 0.05). High-Cd treatment resulted in much larger changes in these parameters than low-Cd treatment. Following Mo application, the accumulation of malondialdehyde and proline decreased in the leaves of Cd-stressed plants; reversely, the contents of soluble protein, soluble sugar, and chlorophyll, and the activities of superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase, all increased compared to those of single Cd treatment (p-values < 0.05). Exogenous Mo application promoted shoot and root growth of Cd-stressed plants in terms of their length, fresh weight, and dry weight. The negative effect of Cd stress on leaf chlorophyll fluorescence was substantially mitigated by applying Mo. Exogenous Mo also improved the uptake of inorganic cations, especially potassium (K+), in Cd-stressed plants. After Mo application, Cd uptake and accumulation were inhibited and Cd tolerance was enhanced, but Cd translocation was less affected in Cd-stressed plants. The mitigation effect of Mo on Cd stress in rape was achieved through the immobilization of soil Cd to reduce plant uptake, and improvement of plant physiological properties to enhance Cd tolerance. In conclusion, exogenous Mo can effectively reduce Cd toxicity to rape and the optimal Mo concentration was 100 mg/kg under the experimental conditions.Entities:
Keywords: cadmium uptake; chlorophyll fluorescence; exogenous molybdenum; physiological parameters; plant biomass
Year: 2020 PMID: 32244320 PMCID: PMC7177489 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17072355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Experimental design of heavy metal concentrations per kg of soil.
| Treatment | Cd (mg) | Mo (mg) | Treatment | Cd (mg) | Mo (mg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 0 | 0 | C2M1 | 6 | 50 |
| C1 | 0.5 | 0 | C2M2 | 6 | 100 |
| C1M1 | 0.5 | 50 | C2M3 | 6 | 200 |
| C1M2 | 0.5 | 100 | M1 | 0 | 50 |
| C1M3 | 0.5 | 200 | M2 | 0 | 100 |
| C2 | 6 | 0 | M3 | 0 | 200 |
Note: The dosages of reagents added were converted to the amounts of Cd and Mo.
Figure 1The biomass of rape plants with the co-treatment of Mo and Cd (n = 4). Note: Data are the mean ± standard deviation. Different lowercase letters above or below the error bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). CK (control group), C1 (treatment by 0.5 mg/kg Cd), C1M1 (treatment by 0.5 mg/kg Cd and 50 mg/kg Mo), C1M2 (treatment by 0.5 mg/kg Cd and 100 mg/kg Mo), C1M3 (treatment by 0.5 mg/kg Cd and 200 mg/kg Mo), C2 (treatment by 6.0 mg/kg Cd), C2M1 (treatment by 6.0 mg/kg Cd and 50 mg/kg Mo), C2M2 (treatment by 6.0 mg/kg Cd and 100 mg/kg Mo), C2M3 (treatment by 6.0 mg/kg Cd and 200 mg/kg Mo), M1 (treatment by 50 mg/kg Mo), M2 (treatment by 100 mg/kg Mo), M3 (treatment by 200 mg/kg Mo).
Changes in leaf physiological parameters of rape plants with the co-treatment of Mo and Cd (n = 4).
| Treatment | MDA | Proline | Soluble Proteins | Soluble Sugars | Chlorophyll | SOD | GPX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mmol/kgFW) | (mg/kgFw) | (mg/kg·103) | (mg/kg·103) | (mg/kg·103) | (U/g·h) | (U/g·h) | |
| CK | 14.6 ± 0.8bc | 95.2 ± 6.4c | 17.4 ± 1.2a | 66.2 ± 2.2a | 2.51 ± 0.12a | 260 ± 12b | 97.5 ± 8.9a |
| C1 | 19.7 ± 1.6a | 142 ± 5a | 15.8 ± 1.1b | 59.4 ± 2.1b | 2.14 ± 0.31c | 251 ± 15c | 71.2 ± 3.6c |
| C1M1 | 15.4 ± 2.2b | 125 ± 8ab | 14.2 ± 1.7bc | 58.1 ± 2.1b | 2.25 ± 0.13b | 256 ± 15b | 80.8 ± 7.3b |
| C1M2 | 13.7 ± 0.7c | 115 ± 4b | 17.5 ± 0.8a | 60.2 ± 1.3b | 2.39 ± 0.15b | 277 ± 18a | 85.8 ± 6.7ab |
| C1M3 | 12.8 ± 1.8c | 121 ± 6ab | 18.7 ± 0.9a | 57.2 ± 2.1b | 2.58 ± 0.31a | 242 ± 9c | 68.7 ± 2.2c |
| CK | 14.6 ± 0.8c | 95.2 ± 6.4c | 17.4 ± 1.2a | 66.2 ± 2.2a | 2.51 ± 0.12a | 260 ± 12a | 97.5 ± 8.9a |
| C2 | 42.7 ± 1.5a | 211 ± 25a | 4.3 ± 0.5c | 40.1 ± 1.7c | 1.73 ± 0.10c | 204 ± 28b | 40.4 ± 7.7bc |
| C2M1 | 39.7 ± 1.9a | 221 ± 27a | 6.4 ± 0.1c | 47.2 ± 1.5bc | 1.78 ± 0.24c | 228 ± 22ab | 45.1 ± 2.9bc |
| C2M2 | 25.7 ± 2.1b | 187 ± 14b | 9.1 ± 1.0bc | 52.4 ± 1.9b | 1.97 ± 0.15b | 242 ± 20a | 54.7 ± 3.7b |
| C2M3 | 38.7 ± 1.6a | 212 ± 12a | 12.4 ± 1.3b | 53.2 ± 2.5b | 2.06 ± 0.27b | 210 ± 18b | 35.5 ± 5.7c |
| CK | 14.6 ± 0.8b | 95.2 ± 6.4b | 17.4 ± 1.2b | 66.2 ± 2.2ab | 2.51 ± 0.12ab | 260 ± 12a | 97.5 ± 8.9a |
| M1 | 10.4 ± 1.9c | 92.3 ± 5.8b | 20.4 ± 1.3a | 68.1 ± 2.2a | 2.63 ± 0.19a | 270 ± 9a | 98.8 ± 2.8a |
| M2 | 13.7 ± 2.1b | 94.6 ± 8.5b | 22.6 ± 0.8a | 72.5 ± 1.9a | 2.70 ± 0.11a | 278 ± 19a | 102 ± 13a |
| M3 | 21.7 ± 0.8a | 109 ± 10a | 13.7 ± 1.1c | 54.4 ± 3.2b | 2.33 ± 0.30b | 232 ± 21b | 88.0 ± 5.9b |
Note: MDA = Malondialdehyde, SOD = Superoxide dismutase, GPX = Glutathione peroxidase. Data are the mean ± standard deviation. Values in the same column followed by different lowercase letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). CK (control group), C1 (treatment by 0.5 mg/kg Cd), C1M1 (treatment by 0.5 mg/kg Cd and 50 mg/kg Mo), C1M2 (treatment by 0.5 mg/kg Cd and 100 mg/kg Mo), C1M3 (treatment by 0.5 mg/kg Cd and 200 mg/kg Mo), C2 (treatment by 6.0 mg/kg Cd), C2M1 (treatment by 6.0 mg/kg Cd and 50 mg/kg Mo), C2M2 (treatment by 6.0 mg/kg Cd and 100 mg/kg Mo), C2M3 (treatment by 6.0 mg/kg Cd and 200 mg/kg Mo), M1 (treatment by 50 mg/kg Mo), M2 (treatment by 100 mg/kg Mo), M3 (treatment by 200 mg/kg Mo).
Figure 2Effect of exogenous Mo on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in rape plants under different levels of Cd treatments (n = 4). Note: Data are the mean ± standard deviation. Different lowercase letters above the error bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). CK (control group), C1 (treatment by 0.5 mg/kg Cd), C1M1 (treatment by 0.5 mg/kg Cd and 50 mg/kg Mo), C1M2 (treatment by 0.5 mg/kg Cd and 100 mg/kg Mo), C1M3 (treatment by 0.5 mg/kg Cd and 200 mg/kg Mo), C2 (treatment by 6.0 mg/kg Cd), C2M1 (treatment by 6.0 mg/kg Cd and 50 mg/kg Mo), C2M2 (treatment by 6.0 mg/kg Cd and 100 mg/kg Mo), C2M3 (treatment by 6.0 mg/kg Cd and 200 mg/kg Mo), M1 (treatment by 50 mg/kg Mo), M2 (treatment by 100 mg/kg Mo), M3 (treatment by 200 mg/kg Mo).
The changes of inorganic cation contents in rape with the co-treatment of Mo and Cd (n = 4).
| Treatment | K+ | Na+ | Ca2+ | Mg2+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | |
| CK | 31.2 ± 2.2b | 4.78 ± 0.12a | 8.45 ± 0.25a | 4.31 ± 0.12a |
| C1 | 29.7 ± 1.7b | 4.36 ± 0.12a | 8.41 ± 0.18a | 4.21 ± 0.13a |
| C1M1 | 31.8 ± 2.5b | 4.55 ± 0.23a | 8.51 ± 0.26a | 4.31 ± 0.14a |
| C1M2 | 35.7 ± 1.2a | 4.75 ± 0.13a | 8.66 ± 0.23a | 4.44 ± 0.24a |
| C1M3 | 37.2 ± 1.6a | 4.78 ± 0.22a | 8.67 ± 0.07a | 4.53 ± 0.27a |
| CK | 31.2 ± 2.2a | 4.78 ± 0.12a | 8.45 ± 0.25a | 4.31 ± 0.12a |
| C2 | 14.9 ± 1.8d | 4.01 ± 0.17a | 8.01 ± 0.19a | 3.85 ± 0.28ab |
| C2M1 | 19.5 ± 0.9c | 4.25 ± 0.22a | 7.91 ± 0.22a | 3.54 ± 0.16b |
| C2M2 | 22.5 ± 1.3bc | 4.29 ± 0.37a | 8.01 ± 0.14a | 3.67 ± 0.25b |
| C2M3 | 26.7 ± 1.5b | 4.18 ± 0.11a | 7.96 ± 0.16a | 3.95 ± 0.35ab |
| CK | 31.2 ± 2.2b | 4.78 ± 0.12a | 8.45 ± 0.25a | 4.31 ± 0.12a |
| M1 | 32.2 ± 0.5b | 4.86 ± 0.23a | 8.67 ± 0.16a | 4.36 ± 0.14a |
| M2 | 37.7 ± 1.2a | 4.92 ± 0.13a | 8.76 ± 0.13a | 4.49 ± 0.15a |
| M3 | 39.2 ± 1.6a | 4.71 ± 0.22a | 8.72 ± 0.27a | 4.57 ± 0.18a |
Note: Data are the mean ± standard deviation. Values in the same column followed by different lowercase letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). CK (control group), C1 (treatment by 0.5 mg/kg Cd), C1M1 (treatment by 0.5 mg/kg Cd and 50 mg/kg Mo), C1M2 (treatment by 0.5 mg/kg Cd and 100 mg/kg Mo), C1M3 (treatment by 0.5 mg/kg Cd and 200 mg/kg Mo), C2 (treatment by 6.0 mg/kg Cd), C2M1 (treatment by 6.0 mg/kg Cd and 50 mg/kg Mo), C2M2 (treatment by 6.0 mg/kg Cd and 100 mg/kg Mo), C2M3 (treatment by 6.0 mg/kg Cd and 200 mg/kg Mo), M1 (treatment by 50 mg/kg Mo), M2 (treatment by 100 mg/kg Mo), M3 (treatment by 200 mg/kg Mo).
The changes of Cd content in rape plants with the co-treatment of Mo and Cd (n = 4).
| Treatment | Cd (mg/kg) | Bioconcentration | Translocation Factor | Tolerance Index (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shoot | Root | Factor | |||
| CK | 0.032 ± 0.009b | 0.074 ± 0.046c | 0.442 | 0.432 | 100 |
| C1 | 0.104 ± 0.033a | 0.222 ± 0.014a | 0.441 | 0.468 | 96.4 |
| C1M1 | 0.094 ± 0.021a | 0.201 ± 0.014a | 0.412 | 0.517 | 103 |
| C1M2 | 0.044 ± 0.012b | 0.101 ± 0.024b | 0.196 | 0.436 | 113 |
| C1M3 | 0.024 ± 0.008b | 0.066 ± 0.015c | 0.122 | 0.364 | 124 |
| CK | 0.032 ± 0.009d | 0.074 ± 0.046d | 0.442 | 0.432 | 100 |
| C2 | 0.657 ± 0.052a | 1.09 ± 0.07a | 0.28 | 0.603 | 82.4 |
| C2M1 | 0.386 ± 0.025b | 0.754 ± 0.042b | 0.183 | 0.512 | 89.3 |
| C2M2 | 0.297 ± 0.024b | 0.601 ± 0.015b | 0.144 | 0.494 | 92.9 |
| C2M3 | 0.191 ± 0.012c | 0.354 ± 0.034c | 0.091 | 0.54 | 85.0 |
Note: For Cd content, data are the mean ± standard deviation. Values in the same column followed by different lowercase letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). CK (control group), C1 (treatment by 0.5 mg/kg Cd), C1M1 (treatment by 0.5 mg/kg Cd and 50 mg/kg Mo), C1M2 (treatment by 0.5 mg/kg Cd and 100 mg/kg Mo), C1M3 (treatment by 0.5 mg/kg Cd and 200 mg/kg Mo), C2 (treatment by 6.0 mg/kg Cd), C2M1 (treatment by 6.0 mg/kg Cd and 50 mg/kg Mo), C2M2 (treatment by 6.0 mg/kg Cd and 100 mg/kg Mo), C2M3 (treatment by 6.0 mg/kg Cd and 200 mg/kg Mo).