Literature DB >> 32243778

Ensuring global access to COVID-19 vaccines.

Gavin Yamey1, Marco Schäferhoff2, Richard Hatchett3, Muhammad Pate4, Feng Zhao4, Kaci Kennedy McDade5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32243778      PMCID: PMC7271264          DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30763-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


× No keyword cloud information.
The current response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic involves aggressive implementation of suppression strategies, such as case identification, quarantine and isolation, contact tracing, and social distancing. However, models developed by the Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team suggest that “transmission will quickly rebound if interventions are relaxed”. WHO warns of multiple simultaneous outbreaks of COVID-19 worldwide. The development of COVID-19 vaccines that can be used globally is therefore a priority for ending the pandemic. This vaccine effort should be guided by three imperatives: speed, manufacture and deployment at scale, and global access. In February, 2020, the World Bank and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), which funds development of epidemic vaccines, co-hosted a global consultation on these goals. This consultation led to the launch of a COVID-19 Vaccine Development Taskforce that is now working on how to finance and manufacture vaccines for global access. CEPI estimates that developing up to three vaccines in the next 12–18 months will require an investment of at least US$2 billion. This estimate includes phase 1 clinical trials of eight vaccine candidates, progression of up to six candidates through phase 2 and 3 trials, completion of regulatory and quality requirements for at least three vaccines, and enhancing global manufacturing capacity for three vaccines. This estimate does not include the costs of manufacture or delivery. Progress has been rapid. A phase 1 trial of a vaccine candidate, supported by the US National Institutes of Health and CEPI, began on March 16, 2020, and 2 days later a clinical trial began in China. Clinical trials for other candidates will start soon. Use of existing financing systems to support this work offers the benefits of speed and lower transaction costs than for new financing approaches. CEPI is supported by a World Bank financial intermediary fund that brings together public, philanthropic, and private funding to respond to global priorities. Through this fund, CEPI can act as a global mechanism for funding vaccine development until vaccines can be licensed or used under emergency use provisions. Mobilising $2 billion in funding will require funding from all sources. Given the enormous health, social, and economic consequences of COVID-19, there is a strong case for all governments to invest in vaccines. In addition to direct government contributions, innovative finance mechanisms have been successful in raising funds for vaccines in the past and should be used to fund the development of COVID-19 vaccines.8, 9 The International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) raises funds with vaccine bonds, which turn long-term contributions by donors into available cash. IFFIm was created to support Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, but could be used to finance CEPI's COVID-19 vaccine efforts. With advanced market commitments, donors make funding commitments to vaccine manufacturers and, in exchange, companies sign a legally binding commitment to provide the vaccines at a price affordable to low-income and middle-income countries. Gavi's board expressed support for the use of Gavi's IFFIm and advanced market commitments to improve COVID-19 vaccine development and access. The need for COVID-19 vaccines is global, although the need is differentially distributed within populations. Vaccines would likely be prioritised for health-care workers and people at greatest risk of severe illness and death. High-income countries must not monopolise the global supply of COVID-19 vaccines. This risk is real: during the 2009 influenza A/H1N1 pandemic, rich countries negotiated large advance orders for the vaccine, crowding out poor countries. Such an outcome would result in a suboptimal allocation of an initially scarce resource. A far better solution would be for governments to ensure there is a globally fair allocation system. With sufficient political will and public sector financing, such a system could be established using existing instruments and institutions. The rudiments of the system would require a global purchasing agent or agents, a substantial but limited-term advanced purchase commitment, and access through the system to financial instruments such as concessional loans or grants and indemnification from liability to offset the risks taken by participating private sector partners. Vaccines purchased through the system should be free at the point of care worldwide for prioritised populations, with national allocations determined through a fair and objective process. On March 16, 2020, the G7 committed to supporting the launch of joint research projects for COVID-19 treatments and vaccines. High-level dialogue is needed on ways to ensure complementarity of efforts and global access to COVID-19 vaccines. Investments should proceed in tandem to build national systems for delivery of potential vaccines—eg, using domestic financing and external financing from the World Bank Group's $14 billion COVID-19 Fast Track Facility and reallocations from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Gavi, and Global Financing Facility grants for service delivery.
  2 in total

1.  Negotiating equitable access to influenza vaccines: global health diplomacy and the controversies surrounding avian influenza H5N1 and pandemic influenza H1N1.

Authors:  David P Fidler
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 2.  Banking for health: opportunities in cooperation between banking and health applying innovation from other sectors.

Authors:  Ilona Kickbusch; Rüdiger Krech; Christian Franz; Nadya Wells
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2018-06-06
  2 in total
  66 in total

Review 1.  Vaccines and routine immunization strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Ener Cagri Dinleyici; Ray Borrow; Marco Aurélio Palazzi Safadi; Pierre van Damme; Flor M Munoz
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  On the Frontline-A bibliometric Study on Sustainability, Development, Coronaviruses, and COVID-19.

Authors:  Andrea Gatto; Carlo Drago; Matteo Ruggeri
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Wearables for the Next Pandemic.

Authors:  Ava Hedayatipour; Nicole Mcfarlane
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.367

4.  Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 on surfaces and in solution with Virusend (TX-10), a novel disinfectant.

Authors:  Enyia R Anderson; Grant L Hughes; Edward I Patterson
Journal:  Access Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-26

5.  Immune-Based Therapy for COVID-19.

Authors:  Abdolreza Esmaeilzadeh; Davood Jafari; Safa Tahmasebi; Reza Elahi; Elnaz Khosh
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  The investigation of mRNA vaccines formulated in liposomes administrated in multiple routes against SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Hai Huang; Caili Zhang; Shuping Yang; Wen Xiao; Qian Zheng; Xiangrong Song
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 9.776

7.  Seroprevalence of Antibodies to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Among Healthcare Workers in Kenya.

Authors:  Anthony O Etyang; Ruth Lucinde; Henry Karanja; Catherine Kalu; Daisy Mugo; James Nyagwange; John Gitonga; James Tuju; Perpetual Wanjiku; Angela Karani; Shadrack Mutua; Hosea Maroko; Eddy Nzomo; Eric Maitha; Evanson Kamuri; Thuranira Kaugiria; Justus Weru; Lucy B Ochola; Nelson Kilimo; Sande Charo; Namdala Emukule; Wycliffe Moracha; David Mukabi; Rosemary Okuku; Monicah Ogutu; Barrack Angujo; Mark Otiende; Christian Bottomley; Edward Otieno; Leonard Ndwiga; Amek Nyaguara; Shirine Voller; Charles N Agoti; David James Nokes; Lynette Isabella Ochola-Oyier; Rashid Aman; Patrick Amoth; Mercy Mwangangi; Kadondi Kasera; Wangari Ng'ang'a; Ifedayo M O Adetifa; E Wangeci Kagucia; Katherine Gallagher; Sophie Uyoga; Benjamin Tsofa; Edwine Barasa; Philip Bejon; J Anthony G Scott; Ambrose Agweyu; George M Warimwe
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Psychological, social, and situational factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination intentions: A study of UK key workers and non-key workers.

Authors:  Sarah Butter; Emily McGlinchey; Emma Berry; Cherie Armour
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2021-05-05

9.  Healthcare Workers' Perspectives on the Upcoming COVID-19 Vaccine in Terms of Their Exposure to the Influenza Vaccine in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Leena R Baghdadi; Shatha G Alghaihb; Alanoud A Abuhaimed; Dania M Alkelabi; Rawan S Alqahtani
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-06

Review 10.  Factors Influencing Public Attitudes towards COVID-19 Vaccination: A Scoping Review Informed by the Socio-Ecological Model.

Authors:  Ghadir Fakhri Al-Jayyousi; Mohamed Abdelhady Mabrouk Sherbash; Lamees Abdullah Mohammed Ali; Asmaa El-Heneidy; Nour Waleed Zuhair Alhussaini; Manar Elsheikh Abdelrahman Elhassan; Maisa Ayman Nazzal
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.