Literature DB >> 32243168

A Bayesian Null Interval Hypothesis Test Controls False Discovery Rates and Improves Sensitivity in Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics.

Robert J Millikin1, Michael R Shortreed1, Mark Scalf1, Lloyd M Smith1.   

Abstract

Statistical significance tests are a common feature in quantitative proteomics workflows. The Student's t-test is widely used to compute the statistical significance of a protein's change between two groups of samples. However, the t-test's null hypothesis asserts that the difference in means between two groups is exactly zero, often marking small but uninteresting fold-changes as statistically significant. Compensations to address this issue are widely used in quantitative proteomics, but we suggest that a replacement of the t-test with a Bayesian approach offers a better path forward. In this article, we describe a Bayesian hypothesis test in which the null hypothesis is an interval rather than a single point at zero; the width of the interval is estimated from population statistics. The improved sensitivity of the method substantially increases the number of truly changing proteins detected in two benchmark data sets (ProteomeXchange identifiers PXD005590 and PXD016470). The method has been implemented within FlashLFQ, an open-source software program that quantifies bottom-up proteomics search results obtained from any search tool. FlashLFQ is rapid, sensitive, and accurate and is available both as an easy-to-use graphical user interface (Windows) and as a command-line tool (Windows/Linux/OSX).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian hypothesis test; Bayesian statistics; label-free quantification; quantitative proteomics; software

Year:  2020        PMID: 32243168      PMCID: PMC7294927          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  24 in total

Review 1.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomics.

Authors:  Ruedi Aebersold; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification.

Authors:  Jürgen Cox; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-11-30       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Ultrafast Peptide Label-Free Quantification with FlashLFQ.

Authors:  Robert J Millikin; Stefan K Solntsev; Michael R Shortreed; Lloyd M Smith
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  XNet: A Bayesian Approach to Extracted Ion Chromatogram Clustering for Precursor Mass Spectrometry Data.

Authors:  Mathew Gutierrez; Kyle Handy; Rob Smith
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  moFF: a robust and automated approach to extract peptide ion intensities.

Authors:  Andrea Argentini; Ludger J E Goeminne; Kenneth Verheggen; Niels Hulstaert; An Staes; Lieven Clement; Lennart Martens
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Integrated Identification and Quantification Error Probabilities for Shotgun Proteomics.

Authors:  Matthew The; Lukas Käll
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.911

7.  Empirical Bayesian random censoring threshold model improves detection of differentially abundant proteins.

Authors:  Frank Koopmans; L Niels Cornelisse; Tom Heskes; Tjeerd M H Dijkstra
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  MSstats: an R package for statistical analysis of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments.

Authors:  Meena Choi; Ching-Yun Chang; Timothy Clough; Daniel Broudy; Trevor Killeen; Brendan MacLean; Olga Vitek
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Covariation of Peptide Abundances Accurately Reflects Protein Concentration Differences.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Mohammad Pirmoradian; Roman Zubarev; Lukas Käll
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  DAPAR & ProStaR: software to perform statistical analyses in quantitative discovery proteomics.

Authors:  Samuel Wieczorek; Florence Combes; Cosmin Lazar; Quentin Giai Gianetto; Laurent Gatto; Alexia Dorffer; Anne-Marie Hesse; Yohann Couté; Myriam Ferro; Christophe Bruley; Thomas Burger
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and Opportunities for Bayesian Statistics in Proteomics.

Authors:  Oliver M Crook; Chun-Wa Chung; Charlotte M Deane
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.466

2.  Novel Proteomic Profiling of Epididymal Extracellular Vesicles in the Domestic Cat Reveals Proteins Related to Sequential Sperm Maturation with Differences Observed between Normospermic and Teratospermic Individuals.

Authors:  Tricia Rowlison; Timothy P Cleland; Mary Ann Ottinger; Pierre Comizzoli
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 5.911

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.