Literature DB >> 32243154

Evaluating Scalable Uncertainty Estimation Methods for Deep Learning-Based Molecular Property Prediction.

Gabriele Scalia1,2, Colin A Grambow1, Barbara Pernici2, Yi-Pei Li3, William H Green1.   

Abstract

Advances in deep neural network (DNN)-based molecular property prediction have recently led to the development of models of remarkable accuracy and generalization ability, with graph convolutional neural networks (GCNNs) reporting state-of-the-art performance for this task. However, some challenges remain, and one of the most important that needs to be fully addressed concerns uncertainty quantification. DNN performance is affected by the volume and the quality of the training samples. Therefore, establishing when and to what extent a prediction can be considered reliable is just as important as outputting accurate predictions, especially when out-of-domain molecules are targeted. Recently, several methods to account for uncertainty in DNNs have been proposed, most of which are based on approximate Bayesian inference. Among these, only a few scale to the large data sets required in applications. Evaluating and comparing these methods has recently attracted great interest, but results are generally fragmented and absent for molecular property prediction. In this paper, we quantitatively compare scalable techniques for uncertainty estimation in GCNNs. We introduce a set of quantitative criteria to capture different uncertainty aspects and then use these criteria to compare MC-dropout, Deep Ensembles, and bootstrapping, both theoretically in a unified framework that separates aleatoric/epistemic uncertainty and experimentally on public data sets. Our experiments quantify the performance of the different uncertainty estimation methods and their impact on uncertainty-related error reduction. Our findings indicate that Deep Ensembles and bootstrapping consistently outperform MC-dropout, with different context-specific pros and cons. Our analysis leads to a better understanding of the role of aleatoric/epistemic uncertainty, also in relation to the target data set features, and highlights the challenge posed by out-of-domain uncertainty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32243154     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  9 in total

1.  Temporal and Spatial Differences of Urban Ecological Environment and Economic Development Based on Graph Neural Network.

Authors:  Wenbo Zhang; Binggeng Xie
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-21

2.  Assigning confidence to molecular property prediction.

Authors:  AkshatKumar Nigam; Robert Pollice; Matthew F D Hurley; Riley J Hickman; Matteo Aldeghi; Naruki Yoshikawa; Seyone Chithrananda; Vincent A Voelz; Alán Aspuru-Guzik
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 7.050

3.  Uncertainty quantification in classical molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Shunzhou Wan; Robert C Sinclair; Peter V Coveney
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Multi-fidelity prediction of molecular optical peaks with deep learning.

Authors:  Kevin P Greenman; William H Green; Rafael Gómez-Bombarelli
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 9.825

5.  Drug-likeness scoring based on unsupervised learning.

Authors:  Kyunghoon Lee; Jinho Jang; Seonghwan Seo; Jaechang Lim; Woo Youn Kim
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 9.825

6.  PIGNet: a physics-informed deep learning model toward generalized drug-target interaction predictions.

Authors:  Seokhyun Moon; Wonho Zhung; Soojung Yang; Jaechang Lim; Woo Youn Kim
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 9.825

7.  Probabilistic Deep Learning to Quantify Uncertainty in Air Quality Forecasting.

Authors:  Abdulmajid Murad; Frank Alexander Kraemer; Kerstin Bach; Gavin Taylor
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 8.  Uncertainty quantification: Can we trust artificial intelligence in drug discovery?

Authors:  Jie Yu; Dingyan Wang; Mingyue Zheng
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-07-21

9.  A universal similarity based approach for predictive uncertainty quantification in materials science.

Authors:  Vadim Korolev; Iurii Nevolin; Pavel Protsenko
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.996

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.