Hiroshi Nishi1, Yui Yoshida1,2, Reiko Inoue1, Koji Takemura1, Masaomi Nangaku1. 1. Division of Nephrology and Endocrinology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
AIM: The urine dipstick is a simple diagnostic module for detecting proteinuria, haematuria and glycosuria and is favourably accepted in East Asia despite debates regarding its accuracy and target population, claiming that quantitative tests for a high-risk cohort should be more cost-effective. However, the current status of utilizing this test in these countries is not widely known due to lack of extensive data. We aimed to clarify the current nationwide and regional status of utilization of the urine dipstick test in an outpatient care setting and to determine the regional factors associated with adoption of this method. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used openly accessible data from the national claim database that included the health insurance claims data of the Japanese population in 2017. RESULTS: In total, 67 125 386 urine dipstick tests were performed compared with 1 862 700 quantitative urine protein tests and 17 544 949 urine sediment microscopy tests. Dipstick tests were employed principally for those who are >65 years old (60.3%) and, although the male population (52.5%) is generally larger, the female population is larger in age of 15 to 39 years and >85 years. Multivariate analysis with several regional parameters revealed that the test was performed more commonly in the areas that accommodate greater elderly population (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Despite a heated dispute, the urine dipstick test is performed even more frequently than the quantitative biochemical or microscopic sediment tests, especially in regions holding the larger elderly population, which suggests that the test forms a part of geriatric medical care.
AIM: The urine dipstick is a simple diagnostic module for detecting proteinuria, haematuria and glycosuria and is favourably accepted in East Asia despite debates regarding its accuracy and target population, claiming that quantitative tests for a high-risk cohort should be more cost-effective. However, the current status of utilizing this test in these countries is not widely known due to lack of extensive data. We aimed to clarify the current nationwide and regional status of utilization of the urine dipstick test in an outpatient care setting and to determine the regional factors associated with adoption of this method. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used openly accessible data from the national claim database that included the health insurance claims data of the Japanese population in 2017. RESULTS: In total, 67 125 386 urine dipstick tests were performed compared with 1 862 700 quantitative urine protein tests and 17 544 949 urine sediment microscopy tests. Dipstick tests were employed principally for those who are >65 years old (60.3%) and, although the male population (52.5%) is generally larger, the female population is larger in age of 15 to 39 years and >85 years. Multivariate analysis with several regional parameters revealed that the test was performed more commonly in the areas that accommodate greater elderly population (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Despite a heated dispute, the urine dipstick test is performed even more frequently than the quantitative biochemical or microscopic sediment tests, especially in regions holding the larger elderly population, which suggests that the test forms a part of geriatric medical care.