Literature DB >> 32243006

The impact of implementing speech recognition technology on the accuracy and efficiency (time to complete) clinical documentation by nurses: A systematic review.

Joseph Joseph1,2, Zena E H Moore2, Declan Patton2, Tom O'Connor2, Linda Elizabeth Nugent2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Speech recognition technology (SRT) recognises an individual's spoken word signals through a microphone and subsequently processes the user's words into digital text by means of a computer. SRT remains well established and continues to grow in popularity among the various health disciplines. Many studies have been done to examine the effects of SRT on nursing documentation, however, no previous systematic review (SR) on the effects of SRT on accuracy and efficiency of nursing documentation was identified. AIMS AND METHODS: To systematically review the impact of speech recognition technology on the accuracy and efficiency of clinical nursing documentation. A SR was conducted that measures the accuracy and efficiency (time to complete documentation) of SRT on nursing documentation. An extensive search of the literature included Web of Science, CINAHL via EBSCO host, Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE and Google Scholar. The PRISMA checklist screened eligible papers. The quality of each paper was critically appraised, data extracted and analysed/synthesised.
RESULTS: A total of 10 studies were included. Various devices and systems have been used to examine the accuracy, efficiency and impact of SRT on nursing documentation. A positive impact of SRT with significant advances in accuracy/productivity of nursing documentation at the point of care was found. However, a substantial degree of initial costing, training requirements and studied interface modification to individual healthcare units are needful in incorporating SRT systems.
CONCLUSIONS: Speech recognition technology when applied to nursing documentation could open up a promising new interface for data entry from the point of care, though the full potential of the technology has not been explored. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The compatibility/effectiveness of SRT with existing computer systems remains understudied. SRT training, prompt on-site technical support, maintenance and upgrades cannot be underestimated towards achieving high-level accuracy and efficiency (time to complete documentation) with SRT.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  computerised; documentation; nursing activity; nursing information systems; systematic review; telenursing; text interpretation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32243006     DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  2 in total

1.  Conversational Artificial Intelligence for Spinal Pain Questionnaire: Validation and User Satisfaction.

Authors:  Kyoung Hyup Nam; Da Young Kim; Dong Hwan Kim; Jung Hwan Lee; Jae Il Lee; Mi Jeong Kim; Joo Young Park; Jae Hyun Hwang; Sang Seok Yun; Byung Kwan Choi; Min Gyu Kim; In Ho Han
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-05-12

2.  Digitization in Everyday Nursing Care: A Vignette Study in German Hospitals.

Authors:  Lisa Korte; Sabine Bohnet-Joschko
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.