Ting Geng1, Johannes Ehrmaier2, Oliver Schalk1,3, Gareth W Richings4, Tony Hansson1, Graham Worth5, Richard D Thomas1. 1. Department of Physics, AlbaNova University Centre, Stockholm University, Roslagstullsbacken 21, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. 2. Department of Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstr. 4, 85748 Garching, Germany. 3. Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. 4. Department of Chemistry and Centre for Scientific Computing, University of Warwick, CV4 7AL Coventry, U.K. 5. Department of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, WC1H 0AJ London, U.K.
Abstract
The excited state relaxation pathways of isoxazole and oxazole upon excitation with UV-light were investigated by nonadiabatic ab initio dynamics simulations and time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy. Excitation of the bright ππ*-state of isoxazole predominantly leads to ring-opening dynamics. Both the initially excited ππ*-state and the dissociative πσ*-state offer a combined barrier-free reaction pathway, such that ring-opening, defined as a distance of more than 2 Å between two neighboring atoms, occurs within 45 fs. For oxazole, in contrast, the excited state dynamics is about twice as slow (85 fs) and the quantum yield for ring-opening is lower. This is caused by a small barrier between the ππ*-state and the πσ*-state along the reaction path, which suppresses direct ring-opening. Theoretical findings are consistent with the measured time-resolved photoelectron spectra, confirming the timescales and the quantum yields for the ring-opening channel. The results indicate that a combination of time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy and excited state dynamics simulations can explain the dominant reaction pathways for this class of molecules. As a general rule, we suggest that the antibonding σ*-orbital located between the oxygen atom and a neighboring atom of a five-membered heterocyclic system provides a driving force for ring-opening reactions, which is modified by the presence and position of additional nitrogen atoms.
The excited state relaxation pathways of isoxazole and oxazole upon excitation with UV-light were investigated by nonadiabatic ab initio dynamics simulations and time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy. Excitation of the bright ππ*-state of isoxazole predominantly leads to ring-opening dynamics. Both the initially excited ππ*-state and the dissociative πσ*-state offer a combined barrier-free reaction pathway, such that ring-opening, defined as a distance of more than 2 Å between two neighboring atoms, occurs within 45 fs. For oxazole, in contrast, the excited state dynamics is about twice as slow (85 fs) and the quantum yield for ring-opening is lower. This is caused by a small barrier between the ππ*-state and the πσ*-state along the reaction path, which suppresses direct ring-opening. Theoretical findings are consistent with the measured time-resolved photoelectron spectra, confirming the timescales and the quantum yields for the ring-opening channel. The results indicate that a combination of time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy and excited state dynamics simulations can explain the dominant reaction pathways for this class of molecules. As a general rule, we suggest that the antibonding σ*-orbital located between the oxygen atom and a neighboring atom of a five-membered heterocyclic system provides a driving force for ring-opening reactions, which is modified by the presence and position of additional nitrogen atoms.
The
UV-light-induced photodynamics of small heterocyclic aromaticcompounds is currently under heavy investigation. This is especially
true for the fundamental systems of pyrrole[1−6] and furan,[7−9] but to a lesser degree also for their isoelectroniccounterparts, which are obtained by replacing a C–H unit in
the ring by a nitrogen atom. Some common questions that these investigations
try to answer are: (i) which are the accessible relaxation channels?
(ii) what are the quantum yields of the different channels? and (iii)
how fast is the dynamics? All three questions are correlated and cannot
be answered independently. In general, the dominant relaxation channels
are (a) ring-puckering dynamics, (b) ring-opening dynamics, usually
at the heteroatom in the 1-position, and (c) N–H bond-breaking
in molecules with an N–H group. Ring-puckering dynamicscan
be slow, and the molecule can then get trapped in the excited state
long enough to undergo secondary reaction channels, such as intersystem
crossing.Based on these questions, it is possible to dig deeper
and pose
a more fundamental one: (iv) is it possible to predict the outcome
of the photoinduced reaction based on the molecular structure (also
known as “Polanyi rules for excited state polyatomic dynamics”[10])? In order to make a step toward answering this
last question, we performed nonadiabatic excited state ab initio dynamics
simulations and time-resolved photoelectron studies on the UV excitation
of isoxazole and oxazole (see Figure a,c) to fill the gap of missing experiments on these
fundamental five-membered heterocyclic systems.
Figure 1
Equilibrium geometries
and geometries after ring-opening of isoxazole
(a,b) and oxazole (c,d) for the photoinduced ring-opening reactions.
Ring-opened geometries were obtained by minimizing the energy of the
πσ*-state for a bond distance of 3.0 Å using a C-symmetry constraint. Here,
the atoms have the following colors—C (dark grey); O (red);
N (blue); and H (white).
Equilibrium geometries
and geometries after ring-opening of isoxazole
(a,b) and oxazole (c,d) for the photoinduced ring-opening reactions.
Ring-opened geometries were obtained by minimizing the energy of the
πσ*-state for a bond distance of 3.0 Å using a C-symmetry constraint. Here,
the atoms have the following colors—C (dark grey); O (red);
N (blue); and H (white).Despite the relatively
simple molecular structure, the literature
about the photoinduced dynamics of isoxazole is extremely sparse.[11−15] There is even less literature on the photoinduced dynamics of pure
oxazole, although it is more abundant in larger aromatic systems.[14,16,17] The photochemistry of these compounds
in the liquid phase is dominated by the formation of aryl-oxazoles,
which are rearrangements of the ring system.[18] The absorption spectra of isoxazole and oxazole, however, have been
studied thoroughly both experimentally and theoretically, and exhibit
a broad peak around 6.0 eV indicating a ππ* excitation
(6.0 eV for oxazole and 6.3 eV for isoxazole).[19,20] Cao et al. studied the photodynamics of isoxazole and oxazole theoretically
by using nonadiabatic surface-hopping dynamics simulations based on
complete active space self-consistent field (CASSCF) electronic structure
calculations.[15,17] Their calculated vertical excitation
energies of the ππ*-state are 6.3 eV for isoxazole and
6.7 eV for oxazole, which are in reasonable agreement with experimental
observations.[15,17] Theoretical predictions show
that a substantial fraction of the isoxazole molecules undergoes ultrafast
O–N bond cleavage after photoexcitation, while other molecules
stay intact and return to the ring-closed ground state before possibly
undergoing subsequent reactions.[15] For
these latter systems, one such process is the oxazole–isoxazole
rearrangement, which has been found in experimental studies for oxazole
derivatives.[14,21] Dias et al. investigated the
product yields of isoxazole after photoexcitation at 193 nm using
a chirped-pulse Fourier transform millimeter-wave spectroscopy/pulsed
uniform flow technique.[13] The authors found
that the main product channels (HCN + CH2CO and HCO + CH2CN with quantum yields of (53.8 ± 1.7) and (23.4 ±
6.8)%, respectively) were populated because of an ultrafast, nonstatistical,
and direct reaction, while minor channels were populated by a statistical
distribution from the ground state. The photoinduced dynamics of oxazole
has primarily been studied theoretically.[16,17] Cao and coworkers found that the main reaction channel is bond cleavage
of the OC[N]-bond after photoexcitation. Molecules are initially excited
to the ππ*-state, and, within tens of femtoseconds, they
are thought to decay to an nπ*-state (S1 state).
Subsequently, most of them undergo bond cleavage, which triggers a
hop from the S1 to the S0 state.In the
previous descriptions of the photoinduced dynamics of isoxazole
and oxazole, the role of the πσ*-state has not been studied
in detail. However, it has been shown for the isoelectronicfuran[9] that the πσ*-state, involving the
σ*-orbital at the oxygen atom, plays an important role in the
photodynamics, especially with respect to bond cleavage. The antibonding
σ*-orbital of the oxygen atom is also present in both isoxazole
and oxazole. Thus, the πσ*-state may play a decisive role
in the dynamics in isoxazole and oxazole, as it does in furan. To
solve this puzzle, we studied the photodynamics of isoxazole and oxazole
molecules through time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy and excited
state nonadiabatic ab initio calculations. The combination of the
experimental and theoretical results provides a clear picture of the
photoinduced reaction mechanisms for the ring-opening reactions of
the two molecules.
Methods
Experimental
Methods
Oxazole and
isoxazole were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich with purities of 98 and
99%, respectively, and used without further purification.The
absorption spectra of the molecules taken in a 1 cm quartz cuvette
(Hellma) under saturated vapor pressure were measured with a Cary
5e photospectrometer (Varian). The time-resolved photoelectron spectrometer,
a magnetic bottle type apparatus, and other experimental conditions
were identical to those described previously.[22,23] In brief, we used pulses with wavelengths centered at 200 nm as
pump pulses, and pulses centered around 267 nm as probe pulses. These
pulses were generated via frequency quadrupling and tripling of pulses
generated by a standard femtosecond laser system (a Coherent Legend
USP-HE, producing 800 nm pulses of 50 fs width). The intensity of
the pulses in the interaction region of the magnetic bottle spectrometer
was 400 nJ/pulse for the pump, and 2 μJ/pulse for the probe.
The energy resolution of the experiment was 25 meV and the cross-correlation
in the experimental chamber was 140 ± 10 fs, as measured by the
nonresonant ionization signal of xenon, which also served as energy
calibration for the spectrometer. Sample molecules were injected vertically
into the reaction chamber via a gas needle. The temporal delay between
the pump and probe pulses was set by a motorized translation stage.
At each time delay, the pump–probe signal was corrected by
subtracting the background from the pump and probe pulses alone.
Data Fitting
In order to extract
more detailed information, the photoelectron spectra were fitted according
to a Levenberg–Marquart 2D global fitting scheme,[10] which is expressed aswhere A(E) is the decay associated spectrum (DAS)
of the channel i, which has a time-dependent population P(Δt), expressed
in terms of exponential functions exp{−Δt/τ}. Here, τ is the time constant of the respective process,
and Δt = td – t0 is the time delay between the pump and the
probe pulses, which overlap at time zero (t0). Finally, g(Δt) is the
cross-correlation function obtained from the photoelectron spectrum
of Xe (see Experimental Methods section).
In order to account for large amplitude motion, that is, when the
photoelectron kinetic energies decrease upon pump–probe delay
because of a fast decay of the potential energy of the molecule in
the excited state and a concomitant rise of the ionization potential,
time zero can be artificially used as a fitting parameter.[24−26] The timescale of the shift can often be used to account for the
time a wavepacket needs to reach a conical intersection with a lower-lying
potential energy surface.[25,26] In total, the timescale
of the shift and the time constant at the maximum shift provide a
measure of the lifetime of the excited state and values that can be
directly compared with ab initio trajectory calculations.[27] In agreement with ref (9), the uncertainty of the
time zero fit is ±10 fs in the one-photon pump—one-photon
probe region and ±15 fs in the two-photon probe region.
Computational Methods
Geometries
of isoxazole and oxazole were obtained by optimizing the energy of
the electronic ground-state using second-order Møller–Plesset
perturbation theory (MP2).[28] Vertical excitation
energies were subsequently calculated with the second-order algebraic-diagrammaticconstruction scheme (ADC(2)).[29] To investigate
the ring-opening reactions, scans were performed along the ON- and
OC[N]-distances for isoxazole and oxazole, respectively. The geometries
for ON- and OC[N]-distances ≥ 1.7 Å were obtained by minimizing
the energy of the πσ*-state (S1-state) at the
ADC(2) level. The OC[N]-bond describes the OC-bond involving the C-atom
between the O- and N-atoms. All internal degrees of freedom except
the ON- or OC-distance were relaxed to minimize the energy. In order
to be able to select the πσ*-state, the C symmetry constraint had to be applied
in the staticcalculations. Despite the fact that it limits the configurational
space, it is assumed that the calculations provide a clear qualitative
picture of the systems. Ground-state energies were calculated at the
MP2 level at the optimized geometries. The geometries for the scans
from the Franck–Condon (FC) geometry to the geometry optimized
for the energy of the πσ*-state at an ON- or OC[N]-distance
of 1.7 Å were constructed by linear interpolation of Cartesian
coordinates. Ground-state and excited state energies were calculated
as single-point calculations at the MP2 and ADC(2) levels at the given
geometries without further optimization.The photoinduced dynamics
of isoxazole and oxazole was studied using on-the-fly nonadiabatic
surface-hopping simulations. In these direct-dynamics simulations,
Newton’s equations of motion for the nuclei are solved using
electronic energies and gradients calculated at the ADC(2) level for
each step without any constraints. A Landau–Zener-based surface-hopping
algorithm was used to account for nonadiabatic transitions of the
trajectories between different electronic states: a computationally
efficient approach has been recently implemented in the direct-dynamics
surface-hopping code of the group of Došlić[30] and has been benchmarked carefully.[31,32] The lowest three excited states and the ground-state were included
in the calculation. Starting geometries for the trajectories were
obtained by Wigner sampling, and molecules were initially placed on
the S1-state. In total, 100 trajectories were propagated
for 100 fs with a time step of 0.5 fs for each system. All electronic
structure calculations were performed with the Turbomole program package[33] applying the resolution of identity approximation
and Dunning’s augmented correlation consistent double zeta
(aug-cc-pVDZ) basis set.[34]
Results
Computational Results
We performed
static and dynamical simulations on the photoinduced reaction pathways
of isoxazole and oxazole, thereby focusing on the ring-opening reactions
of the two molecules. Figure a,c show their equilibrium geometries optimized at the MP2
level. The ON-distance of the optimized geometry of isoxazole is 1.380
Å, which is slightly shorter than the experimentally observed
equilibrium bond distance of Stiefvater, which is 1.399 Å.[35] The OC[N]-distance in oxazole, that is the OC-bond
including the C-atom between the oxygen and nitrogen atoms, is a little
bit shorter and measures 1.367 Å, which is in between Cao’s
calculated result of 1.371 Å[17] and
the experimentally measured distance of 1.357 Å.[36] The OC[N] bond is prone to ring-opening after photoexcitation,
as shown in Figure d.Vertical excitation energies at the ground-state equilibrium
geometry with the corresponding oscillator strengths are summarized
in Table . For both
molecules, the S1-state is of ππ*-character
and carries significant oscillator strength. The S1-state
of isoxazole is at 6.53 eV, which is in good agreement with Cao’s
CASPT2/cc-pVTZ result of 6.33 eV[15] and
Walker’s computational result of 6.30 eV. Moreover, it coincides
reasonably well, considering the accuracy of the method and the zero
point energy, with the experimental value of around 6.0 eV.[19] The experimental value is estimated from the
maximum of a broad peak, which is assigned as a ππ*-excitation
because of its bathochromic shift from the gas phase to aqueous solution.
The ordering of the three lowest states of isoxazolecoincides with
the ordering in ref (19). S4 is predicted to be a bright valence state at 6.9
eV,[19] which is, however, not included in
our study. For oxazole, the lowest ππ*-excitation is calculated
to be at 6.41 eV, and experimentally, the peak of the first broad
maximum, which corresponds to the ππ*-state, is at 6.2
eV.[20] The second state, S2,
is of nπ*-character for both molecules, whereas S3 is a πσ*-state and is called a Rydberg state because
it involves a diffuse virtual σ*-orbital. The oscillator strengths
of the S2- and S3-states are significantly lower
than that of S1. As a consequence, excitation to the S1-state is supposed to be dominant upon irradiation with photons
in the 6.2 eV region. In the case of oxazole, our state ordering is
consistent with Palmer’s computational results (at the multireference
multiroot configuration interaction (MRD-CI) level with triple-zeta
basis sets) that predict excited state energies of 6.00 eV (ππ*),
6.34 eV (nπ*), and 6.39 eV (πσ*) for S1, S2, and S3, respectively.[20] Cao and coworkers, however, found a different ordering
at the multistate CASSCF/CASPT2 level, where the lowest lying excited
state (S1) is of nπ*-character (6.21 eV) and the
S2-state is the bright ππ*-state (6.72 eV)
with a conical intersection between the two states.[17] At the ADC(2) level with the nonaugmented cc-pVDZ basis
set, we obtain the same inverted ordering with the nπ* state
at 6.77 eV and the ππ* state at 6.92 eV. The lower energy
of the nπ*-state can be explained by an overestimation of the
energy of the n-orbital, which is caused by the nonaugmented basis
set. Therefore, all further calculations have been performed with
the aug-cc-pVDZ basis set. Finally, it is worth mentioning that the
reactive πσ* state, which is responsible for the ring-opening
reactions because of the antibonding orbital of the oxygen atom, is
not shown in Table . At the FC geometry, it is hidden in a dense set of highly energetic
Rydberg states and hard to identify.
Table 1
Vertical
Excited State Energies in
eV and Oscillator Strengths in Parentheses for Isoxazole and Oxazole
Calculated at the ADC(2)/aug-cc-pVDZ Level of Theory
state
isoxazole
oxazole
S1 (2A′, ππ*)
6.53 (0.0926)
6.41 (0.1584)
S2 (1A″, nπ*)
6.62 (0.0057)
6.48 (0.0031)
S3 (2A″, πσ*)
6.88 (0.0226)
6.51 (0.0151)
In the case of isoxazole, the ON-bond
is broken, whereas in the
case of oxazole, the dominant reaction is a ring-opening at the OC[N]-bond.
The product geometries of isoxazole and oxazole, where the energies
of the reactive πσ*-states were optimized for a bond distance
of 3.0 Å applying the Cs symmetry constraint, are
shown in Figure b
and d, respectively. Figure shows scans along the ring-opening reaction coordinate, which
is the ON-distance in the case of isoxazole and the OC[N]-distance
for oxazole. The scans consist of two parts. For large distances (≥1.7
Å), the geometries were obtained by minimizing the energy of
the lowest πσ*-state (blue full dots). The energy of the
electronic ground-state configuration (black open circles) was calculated
at the obtained geometry. In this region (bond lengths of 1.7–3.0
Å), the gradient of the πσ*-state points toward larger
bond distances, thus providing a driving force for the reaction. Along
the reaction coordinate, an intersection between the energy curves
of the ground state and the πσ*-state occurs at 2.25 Å
(2.75 eV) and 2.55 Å (3.43 eV) for isoxazole and oxazole, respectively.
The position of the intersection, the slope of the energy curves at
the intersecting point, and the product energies all support a more
efficient ring-opening reaction for isoxazole than for oxazole. The
virtual σ*-orbitals at a bond distance of 1.7 Å, which
get occupied in the πσ* (S1) electronicconfiguration,
are shown in the inset of Figure . Occupation of the orbitals leads to a destabilization
of the ON- or OC[N]-bond, but the antibonding nature is more strongly
developed in the case of isoxazole (Figure a) compared to the virtual σ*-orbital
of oxazole (Figure b). The antibonding character of the σ*-orbitals explains the
large driving force in the πσ*-state toward large distances,
and the more favorable potential energy surfaces for isoxazole, as
shown in Figure .
Figure 2
Scans
along the ring-opening reaction coordinate. The geometries
were obtained by optimizing the energy of the reactive πσ*-state
for ON-distances ≥ 1.7 Å. From the FC geometry to the
optimized geometry at 1.7 Å, the geometries were constructed
by linear interpolation. For isoxazole, (a) a complete barrier-free
path is obtained starting from the ππ*-state at the FC
point, whereas for oxazole (b) a small barrier has to be overcome.
Black: S0-state; red: A″-states (nπ*- and πσ*-states); green: ππ*-state,
blue: reactive πσ*-state. In the inset, antibonding σ*-orbitals
of (a) isoxazole and (b) oxazole at ON- and OC-bond distances of 1.7
Å are shown.
Scans
along the ring-opening reaction coordinate. The geometries
were obtained by optimizing the energy of the reactive πσ*-state
for ON-distances ≥ 1.7 Å. From the FC geometry to the
optimized geometry at 1.7 Å, the geometries were constructed
by linear interpolation. For isoxazole, (a) a complete barrier-free
path is obtained starting from the ππ*-state at the FC
point, whereas for oxazole (b) a small barrier has to be overcome.
Black: S0-state; red: A″-states (nπ*- and πσ*-states); green: ππ*-state,
blue: reactive πσ*-state. In the inset, antibonding σ*-orbitals
of (a) isoxazole and (b) oxazole at ON- and OC-bond distances of 1.7
Å are shown.The relaxed scans for
large distances (≥1.7 Å) are
minimum energy paths for the ring-opening reaction driven by the reactive
πσ*-state. However, after photoexcitation of isoxazole
or oxazole, the systems are most likely in the ππ*-state
in the FC region because of its large oscillator strength. To connect
the FC region with the minimum energy path for large bond-distances,
we constructed a scan from the ground-state equilibrium geometry to
the geometry optimized for the energy of the πσ*-state
at a bond distance of 1.7 Å (left side of the dashed line in Figure ). It is worthwhile
noting that these scans only describe a bond elongation of about 0.3
Å (though 9 intermediate points were calculated) from the FC
geometries. These scans provide details of the potential energy surfaces
in the FC region and show how to reach the reactive πσ*-state
after photoexcitation. For isoxazole, the gradient of the ππ*-state,
depicted in green in Figure a, points monotonously toward large ON distances, and generates
a net driving force for the ring-opening reaction. The potential energy
surface intersects with the energy curve of the πσ*-state
(blue curve) at 5.9 eV, which is 0.6 eV below the vertical excitation
energy. From this scan (Figure a), we expect an easily accessible conical intersection between
the ππ*- and πσ*-state, which allows efficient
population transfer between the states. In the case of oxazole, shown
in Figure b, the ππ*-state
exhibits a shallow minimum along the chosen reaction path from the
FC point to the geometry optimized at an OC-distance of 1.7 Å.
The intersection between the energy curve of the ππ*-state
and the πσ*-state is at 6.42 eV, which is as high as the
vertical excitation energy. Similar to isoxazole, the reactive πσ*-state
is accessible in oxazole after photoexcitation but, because of the
minimum of the ππ*-state close to the FC region and the
barrier before the intersecting point, a less-efficient transition
to the reactive πσ*-state is expected.100 trajectories
were propagated for 100 fs starting from the S1-state in
order to simulate the dynamics of the two molecules
after photoabsorption. To monitor the ring-opening reaction, the ON-
and OC[N]-distances in isoxazole and oxazole were analyzed as a function
of the time after excitation. The results are plotted in Figure a for isoxazole and
in Figure b for oxazole.
If the bond distance increases to more than 2.0 Å, the trajectory
is recorded as a “ring-opening trajectory”. In the case
of isoxazole, more than 80% of the trajectories show ring-opening
within the first 100 fs. Only for very few cases, a ring-opening and
subsequent ring–closing reaction is observed, suggesting that
ring-opening is a rarely reversible relaxation channel. For oxazole,
both the quantum yield for ring-opening is lower and the process is
slower. Here, only 40% of all the trajectories show a ring-opening
reaction. We also refer to Figure S2 in the Supporting Information for a summary of the opening probability for all
trajectories over time. Already during the first 100 fs, a substantial
difference in the photochemical reactions between the two molecules
becomes apparent, which is consistent with the findings of our scans
that the potential energy surfaces of the ππ*-states differ
qualitatively in the FC region. The topology of the potential energy
surfaces of the ππ* and πσ*-states is responsible
for the differences in the dynamics of the molecules, which will become
clear by analyzing the representative trajectories.
Figure 3
(a) NO-distances of isoxazole
and (b) and OC[N]-distances of oxazole
for all trajectories upon photoexcitation to the S1 (ππ*)-state
during the dynamics.
(a) NO-distances of isoxazole
and (b) and OC[N]-distances of oxazole
for all trajectories upon photoexcitation to the S1 (ππ*)-state
during the dynamics.Figure a,b show
the energy profiles for representative ring-opening trajectories of
isoxazole and oxazole, respectively. The ground-state energy curve
is shown in black, excited state energy curves are plotted in blue,
and red dots indicate the state of the trajectory at a given time.
For isoxazole, the trajectory starts in the S1 (ππ*)-state.
After t = 14 fs, the lowest two excited electronic
states are almost degenerate, which correspond to the ππ*-
and the reactive πσ*-state. In the inset of Figure , the dominant virtual orbitals
of the S1- and S2-states at t = 14 fs are depicted. They are similar to the π* and the antibonding
σ*-orbital of the bright ππ*-state and the reactive
πσ*-state (cf. Figure a). The trajectory continues on the surface of the
S1-state, whose character changes at this point to the
reactive πσ*-state. Because the S1- and S2-states are almost degenerate, and because of the change of
the electroniccharacter of the states, we expect a close lying conical
intersection. At about 22 fs, a curve crossing of the S1-state and the ground state occurs at 3.4 eV. The trajectory continues
on the surface of the πσ*-state, which becomes the most
stable configuration. Thus, the dynamicsconfirms that, after photoexcitation
to the ππ*-state, the system can effectively be transferred
to the reactive πσ*-state by a conical intersection, which
then becomes the most stable configuration for large bond distances.
Figure 4
Energy
profiles for two representative trajectories of (a) isoxazole
and (b) oxazole undergoing ring-opening. Black: S0; blue:
excited states; red dots: the electronic state of the trajectory.
Insets show the virtual π*-orbital of the bright ππ*-state
and virtual σ*-orbital of the reactive πσ*-state
of the representative trajectory of isoxazole at t = 14 fs (a), and the virtual orbital of the S1-state
of the representative trajectory of oxazole at t =
15 fs (b).
Energy
profiles for two representative trajectories of (a) isoxazole
and (b) oxazole undergoing ring-opening. Black: S0; blue:
excited states; red dots: the electronic state of the trajectory.
Insets show the virtual π*-orbital of the bright ππ*-state
and virtual σ*-orbital of the reactive πσ*-state
of the representative trajectory of isoxazole at t = 14 fs (a), and the virtual orbital of the S1-state
of the representative trajectory of oxazole at t =
15 fs (b).Figure b shows
the potential energy curves for a representative trajectory of oxazole
undergoing ring-opening. For this particular trajectory, the OC-bond
starts to stretch immediately and the ring opens after around 20 fs.
Along the bond cleavage coordinate, a large increase of the ground-state
energy occurs, whereas the energy of the S1-state drops.
There is, however, no point of degeneracy between the S1- and the S2-state along the opening process, which is
qualitatively different compared to isoxazole. When considering the
occupied virtual orbital of the S1-state at t = 15 fs, shown in Figure b, we observe that part of the orbital resembles the π*-orbital
of the bright ππ*-state, but electronic density is also
located between the O- and C-atom close to the C-atom. This part of
the orbital is similar to the corresponding density of the antibonding
σ*-orbital of the reactive πσ*-state shown in Figure b. Together with
the fact that there is no point of degeneracy, we conclude that the
trajectory does not come very close to a conical intersection, but
that an adiabatic transition takes place. The character of the S1-state transforms from the bright ππ*-state to
the reactive πσ*-state along the trajectory. We suggest
that the reduced efficiency of the ring-opening reaction in oxazole
is caused by the reduced accessibility of the S2/S1 conical intersection, corresponding to the intersection between
the blue and the green curve in Figure .
Photoelectron Spectrum
of Oxazole
The time-resolved photoelectron spectrum of oxazole
and isoxazole,
pumped with 200 nm (6.23 eV) and probed with 267 nm (4.66 eV), is
plotted in Figures and 6, respectively. According to ref (20), the adiabatic ionization
potential of oxazole is 9.66 eV while the vertical ionization potential
is ∼9.82 eV. The expected energy cut-off for a one-photon pump,
one-photon probe experiment (further denoted as [1,1′]) is
thus around 1.23 eV (6.23 + 4.66 eV – 9.66 eV = 1.23 eV). The
photoelectron spectrum consists of four distinct, close lying peaks
around the [1,1′] cut-off, which are caused by a vibronic progression
in the ionic state. The ionization potential refers to the peak with
the second lowest energy of the photoelectron spectrum, which agrees
with the observed energy cut-off of about 1.2 eV (see Figure a). In addition, we note a
prominent peak at around 1.8 eV in the [1,2′] region, which
likely originates from ionization through the 3s-Rydberg state, that
is accessing the 3s Rydberg state by one 267 nm photon and probed
by the second 267 nm photon. The quantum defect in this case would
be 0.83. More peaks originating from ionization through Rydberg states
can be observed in the two-photon probe region. These states are not
of major interest for this publication, and we refer to ref (27) for more details on the
calculations and the discussion on these states.
Figure 5
Time-resolved photoelectron
spectrum of oxazole upon excitation
at 200 nm and probed at 267 nm.
Figure 6
Time-resolved
photoelectron spectrum of isoxazole upon excitation
at 200 nm and probed at 267 nm.
Figure 7
Time zero
shifts for (a) oxazole and (b) isoxazole for excitation
at 200 nm and probed at 267 nm. In (a) the time zero shift of furan
(200 nm pump and 267 nm probe) is also shown with red open circles,
and the blue dashed line in (a) indicates the [1,1′] cut-off
for oxazole, while the green-dashed line indicates the [1,1′]
cut-off for furan.
Time-resolved photoelectron
spectrum of oxazole upon excitation
at 200 nm and probed at 267 nm.Time-resolved
photoelectron spectrum of isoxazole upon excitation
at 200 nm and probed at 267 nm.Time zero
shifts for (a) oxazole and (b) isoxazole for excitation
at 200 nm and probed at 267 nm. In (a) the time zero shift of furan
(200 nm pump and 267 nm probe) is also shown with red open circles,
and the blue dashed line in (a) indicates the [1,1′] cut-off
for oxazole, while the green-dashed line indicates the [1,1′]
cut-off for furan.The best fitting of the
data was achieved using a triexponential
decay function plus a shifting time zero (see Section ). The time constants were (25 ± 10)
fs, (2 ± 0.4) ps, and (65 ± 10) ps. An additional infinite
time constant was essentially zero. The time zero shift progresses
to 25 fs in the [1,1′] region, but stretches further to (60
± 10) fs in the [1,2′] region (see Figure a). This additional stretch can be considered
as a continuation of the time zero shift observed in the [1,1′]
region signal because two probe photons allow us to access states
with lower potential energy because of the extra energy provided by
the second photon. The stretch and the first time constant are similar
to the isoelectronicfuran (the time zero shift is added to Figure a), where the signal
was assigned to ring-opening dynamics.[8,9] The timescale
of the dynamics also roughly matches the computational results. We
note that the 25 fs time constant has no relevant meaning because
it is only a measure for a rapidly moving wavepacket (see Section ), and the relevant
time constant is the shift plus the time zero shift, which totals
85 fs.In addition to the short time scale, there is a significant
part
of the signal that can be observed during an extended time period
of several tens of picoseconds. This signal is unstructured that is
a sign of a dephased wavepacket (see the DAS in Figure a). Because ground state molecules typically
do not exhibit any significant signal in the time-resolved photoelectron
spectra when using wavelengths in the UV region,[38] the signal must originate from the excited state molecules.
This is a clear sign that a major fraction of the molecules do not
undergo prompt excited state ring-opening, which is in agreement with
our theoretical results. The origin of the signal is discussed in Section .
Figure 8
Decay associated spectra
of (a) oxazole and (b) isoxazole. For
clarity, the amplitude of a longer time constant was given by different
factors.
Decay associated spectra
of (a) oxazole and (b) isoxazole. For
clarity, the amplitude of a longer time constant was given by different
factors.
Photoelectron
Spectrum of Isoxazole
The vertical ionization potential of
isoxazole is 10.12 eV, with
an adiabatic ionization potential of ∼9.94 eV,[19] and the progression is spaced more narrowly than in oxazole
(the two progressions seen in isoxazole are 550 and 1480 cm–1, as compared to 1160 and 1360 cm–1 in oxazole[19,37]) such that no structure is expected in the photoelectron spectrum.
The expected [1,1′] cut-off is thus at 10.89 – 9.94
eV = 0.95 eV. The photoelectron spectrum shows a relatively broad
band spectrum reaching over the energy cut-off. However, a significant
rise of the spectrum is observed around the energy cut-off, and a
change of the time zero fit at the same energetic position confirms
the cut-off energy. The time zero shift is 10 fs in the [1,1′]
region, and 20 fs when the [1,2′] region is included (see Figure b), and the fitted
time constants of isoxazole are 25 fs and 6.5 ps (see Figure b). The fast time component
has a dominant amplitude, which is >100:1 greater than the slower
time constant throughout the whole spectrum. This suggests that the
process associated with this time constant constitutes the major reaction
path, as is discussed below.
Discussion
Dynamical Pathways of Oxazole and Isoxazole
Combining
the results of the experimental observations and the
simulations, the major reaction channel for isoxazole is the ring-opening
reaction arising from ON-bond cleavage. Combining the time zero shift
and the fastest time constant of the fit to the photoelectron spectra,
the timescale of the ring-opening reaction is estimated to be 35 fs.
This is in good agreement with the results of the dynamics simulations,
where about 80% of the trajectories undergo ring-opening within 100
fs. The reason for the fast decay is a combined barrier-free reaction
path on both the ππ*-state and πσ*-states.
This is in agreement with the work of Cao,[15] where most trajectories also exhibit ON-bond cleavage within the
first 100 fs. Dias et al. found a major direct dissociation path in
their product branching studies, which is fully consistent with our
results for the bond cleavage.[13] The presence
of nondirect dissociation is in agreement with the long-lived process
that was observed by time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy and
the 20% of the trajectories without ring-opening determined from our
dynamics simulations.The experimentally obtained timescale
for the fast reaction in oxazole is about twice as large (85 fs) as
that for isoxazole. By comparison with isoxazole and furan (see Section ), this process
can also be assigned to ring-opening dynamics. That this ring-opening
reaction has a longer timescale is confirmed by the dynamics simulations,
and is explained by the presence of a small barrier along the reaction
path between the photoexcited ππ*- and the reactive πσ*-states.
In oxazole, we also observe longer time constants of 2 and 65 ps.
For these time constants, their DAS are unstructured (see Figure a), which indicates
a dephased molecular wavepacket, that is, partial vibrational equilibration
in the excited state. This process indicates a ring-puckering mechanism.
Although the dynamical simulations cannot be extended to a ps timescale,
within 100 fs about one-third of the molecules have undergone bond
cleavage. The remainder may undergo ring-puckering in the excited
state at a later time.
Comparison with Similar
Systems
Isoxazole
and oxazolecan be considered as typical 5-membered heterocyclic systems.
With these data at hand, it is possible to compare them with the well-studied
molecules, pyrrole and furan. The molecule that has the most similarities
with oxazole and isoxazole is furan, where the N-atom is replaced
by a C–H group. Removal of the nitrogen atom leads to a destabilization
of the molecular ground state, which causes a lower-lying excited
valence state and a lower ionization potential. The removal also lowers
the position of the Rydberg states, which plays no role in the oxazole
and isoxazole dynamics but can influence the furan dynamics (see e.g.
refs (7) and (9)).For furan, recent
papers indicate that the O–C ring-opening channel is favored
over ring-puckering dynamics upon excitation to its lowest excited
valence state[8,9] (there exist different studies
favoring ring-puckering,[39] but the similarities
to oxazole incomparison to our calculations show the preference for
ring-opening). The dynamics takes place within 60–80 fs partly
because the ring-opening dynamics is superimposed with ring-puckering
type of dynamics, which seem to prevent direct access to the conical
intersection, similar to observations in oxazole (this timescale of
ring-puckering dynamics on the ring-opening of molecules was discussed
in detail in ref (40)). For comparison, the time zero shifts of the photoelectron experiments
of furan and oxazole are provided in Figure a. Here, the time zero shift of oxazole is
shown in black while the furan dynamics are indicated in red. Besides
an energetic shift of the signal caused by the different ionization
potentials, the dynamics look rather similar, indicating similar reaction
pathways.Finally, the role of the nitrogen atom can be summarized:
starting
from furan, introduction of a nitrogen atom in the ring in the 2-position
accelerates ring-opening and leads to a higher quantum yield of the
direct opening channel, while introduction of a nitrogen atom in the
3-position disfavors ring-opening and leads to a reduced quantum yield.
In a very simplistic picture, one can imagine that the electronegative
nitrogen atom and oxygen atom are repelling each other while substitution
in the 3-position leads to a more positively charged carbon atom,
which leads to a more stable C–O bond. This picture also explains
why pyrrole and similar molecules do not predominantly undergo ring-opening
reactions, as no antibonding σ*-orbitals are present in the
ring (see, e.g. ref (3)). We note that the recent review by Ashfold and coworkers addresses
the potential importance of (n/π)σ* excited
states in promoting ring-opening in heterocyclic systems.[41] The simple interpretation presented here is
supported if the Mulliken charges for isoxazole and oxazole are analyzed.
Here, in the case of isoxazole, the neighboring N- and O-atoms carry
small negative charges, namely −0.09 and −0.18, respectively.
The C-atom next to the O-atom has a positive charge of 0.05. In the
case of oxazole, the negative charges are −0.32 and −0.33
for the O- and N-atoms, but the C-atom in between has a positive charge
of 0.31. Thus, the nitrogen atom increases the positive charge of
the C-atom, which leads to a stronger OC[N]-bond and a shorter bond
length, as discussed in Section .
Conclusions
Understanding
the dynamical pathways of five-membered heteroaromatic
systems upon light excitation remains a challenge. Several pathways
are open, and the fate of the dynamics is often decided in the first
few tens of femtoseconds. The theoretical challenge lies in describing
the Franck–Condon region and the region of the conical intersections
in a balanced manner, while the experimental challenge lies in finding
the right observables to decipher the ongoing dynamics. In the present
contribution, we investigated two fundamental ring systems; oxazole
and isoxazole.For both systems, the dominant ultrafast reaction
mechanism, besides
just relaxation to the S1 state, is ring-opening. For isoxazole,
a barrier-free reaction pathway has been found, which can explain
the ultrafast (sub 50 fs) ring-opening reaction. In oxazole, the dynamics
is both about two times slower and much less efficient because of
a small barrier between the bright ππ*- and the reactive
πσ*-state, where a recent review highlighted the importance
of (n/π)σ* excited states for promoting
ring-opening in heterocyclic systems.[41]Future experimental studies might include X-ray techniques
such
as ultrafast X-ray transient absorption spectroscopy, which recently
benchmarked its applicability for studying ring-opening dynamics.[42]
Authors: Gareth M Roberts; Craig A Williams; Hui Yu; Adam S Chatterley; Jamie D Young; Susanne Ullrich; Vasilios G Stavros Journal: Faraday Discuss Date: 2013 Impact factor: 4.008
Authors: Guorong Wu; Simon P Neville; Oliver Schalk; Taro Sekikawa; Michael N R Ashfold; Graham A Worth; Albert Stolow Journal: J Chem Phys Date: 2015-02-21 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Oliver Schalk; Joachim Galiana; Ting Geng; Tobias L Larsson; Richard D Thomas; Ignacio Fdez Galván; Tony Hansson; Morgane Vacher Journal: J Chem Phys Date: 2020-02-14 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: T J A Wolf; T S Kuhlman; O Schalk; T J Martínez; K B Møller; A Stolow; A-N Unterreiner Journal: Phys Chem Chem Phys Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 3.676