Cheng Luo1, Bin Huang1, Yukun Wu1, Junxing Chen2, Lingwu Chen3. 1. Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China. 2. Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China. junxingchen@hotmail.com. 3. Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China. chenlingwu@hotmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To comprehensively assess the diagnostic performance of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) score for detecting the muscle invasion of bladder cancer. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to November 20, 2019. QUADAS-2 tool assessed the quality of included studies. The diagnostic estimates including sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and the area under the curve (AUC) of hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) were calculated. Further subgroup analysis, meta-regression and sensitivity analysis were conducted. RESULTS: Six studies with 1064 patients were finally included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC value were 0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.94), 0.86 (95% CI 0.71-0.94), and 0.93 (95% CI 0.91-0.95) for VI-RADS 3 as the cutoff value. The corresponding estimates were 0.77 (95% CI 0.65-0.86), 0.97 (95% CI 0.88-0.99), and 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.94) for VI-RADS 4 as the cutoff value. Meta-regression analysis revealed that study design (p value 0.01) and surgical pattern of reference standard (p value 0.02) were source of the heterogeneity of pooled sensitivity. No publication bias was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The VI-RADS score can provide a good predictive ability for detecting the muscle invasiveness of primary bladder cancer with VI-RADS 3 or VI-RADS 4 as the cutoff value. KEY POINTS: • VI-RADS score has high sensitivity and specificity for predicting muscle invasion. • The diagnostic efficiencies of VI-RADS 3 and VI-RADS 4 as the cutoff value are similar. • VI-RADS score could be used for detecting muscle invasion of bladder cancer in clinical practice.
OBJECTIVES: To comprehensively assess the diagnostic performance of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) score for detecting the muscle invasion of bladder cancer. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to November 20, 2019. QUADAS-2 tool assessed the quality of included studies. The diagnostic estimates including sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and the area under the curve (AUC) of hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) were calculated. Further subgroup analysis, meta-regression and sensitivity analysis were conducted. RESULTS: Six studies with 1064 patients were finally included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC value were 0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.94), 0.86 (95% CI 0.71-0.94), and 0.93 (95% CI 0.91-0.95) for VI-RADS 3 as the cutoff value. The corresponding estimates were 0.77 (95% CI 0.65-0.86), 0.97 (95% CI 0.88-0.99), and 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.94) for VI-RADS 4 as the cutoff value. Meta-regression analysis revealed that study design (p value 0.01) and surgical pattern of reference standard (p value 0.02) were source of the heterogeneity of pooled sensitivity. No publication bias was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The VI-RADS score can provide a good predictive ability for detecting the muscle invasiveness of primary bladder cancer with VI-RADS 3 or VI-RADS 4 as the cutoff value. KEY POINTS: • VI-RADS score has high sensitivity and specificity for predicting muscle invasion. • The diagnostic efficiencies of VI-RADS 3 and VI-RADS 4 as the cutoff value are similar. • VI-RADS score could be used for detecting muscle invasion of bladder cancer in clinical practice.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bladder cancer; Diagnostic imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging
Authors: Francesco Del Giudice; Rocco Simone Flammia; Martina Pecoraro; Marco Moschini; David D'Andrea; Emanuele Messina; Lucia Martina Pisciotti; Ettore De Berardinis; Alessandro Sciarra; Valeria Panebianco Journal: World J Urol Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 3.661
Authors: Francesco Del Giudice; Martina Pecoraro; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Stefano Cipollari; Ettore De Berardinis; Marco Bicchetti; Benjamin I Chung; Carlo Catalano; Yoshifumi Narumi; James W F Catto; Valeria Panebianco Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Adham Hijab; Boris Tocco; Ian Hanson; Hanneke Meijer; Christina Junker Nyborg; Anders Smedegaard Bertelsen; Robert Jan Smeenk; Gillian Smith; Jeff Michalski; Brian C Baumann; Shaista Hafeez Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Xiaopan Xu; Huanjun Wang; Yan Guo; Xi Zhang; Baojuan Li; Peng Du; Yang Liu; Hongbing Lu Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-07-15 Impact factor: 6.244