| Literature DB >> 32242137 |
Chiara de Lucia1, Tytus Murphy1, Claire J Steves2, Richard J B Dobson3, Petroula Proitsi1, Sandrine Thuret4,5.
Abstract
Aging induces cellular and molecular changes including modification of stem cell pools. In particular, alterations in aging neural stem cells (NSCs) are linked to age-related cognitive decline which can be modulated by lifestyle. Nutrient-sensing pathways provide a molecular basis for the link between lifestyle and cognitive decline. Adopting a back-translation strategy using stem cell biology to inform epidemiological analyses, here we show associations between cellular readouts of NSC maintenance and expression levels of nutrient-sensing genes following NSC exposure to aging human serum as well as morphological and gene expression alterations following repeated passaging. Epidemiological analyses on the identified genes showed associations between polymorphisms in SIRT1 and ABTB1 and cognitive performance as well as interactions between SIRT1 genotype and physical activity and between GRB10 genotype and adherence to a Mediterranean diet. Our study contributes to the understanding of neural stem cell molecular mechanisms underlying human cognitive aging and hints at lifestyle modifiable factors.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32242137 PMCID: PMC7118127 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-020-0844-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Commun Biol ISSN: 2399-3642
Fig. 1Graphical summary of the cellular and epidemiological experiments.
The ageing process was mimicked in vitro via the treatment with HU (hydroxyurea), tBHP (tert-butyl hydroperoxide) and repeated passaging of human hippocampal progenitor cells (HPC). The HPCs were assessed for cellular alterations via morphological and immunohistochemical analysis and for molecular alterations via qPCRs (a). We report morphological alterations reminiscent of a senescent phenotype as well as several gene expression alterations in nutrient-sensing pathway genes following in vitro ageing. In parallel, epidemiological techniques were employed to assess how diet, exercise and genetics interact to affect age-related cognitive performance throughout ageing (b). Dietary measures such as Healthy Eating Index (HEI), Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS) and daily calorie intake, as well as results from the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) were employed to assess the role of lifestyle on cognition. The role of genetics was also assessed by investigating the association between polymorphisms in nutrient-sensing genes identified in (a) and cognitive performance. We demonstrate an important contribution of both lifestyle and genetics to age-dependent cognitive performance.
Fig. 2Expression levels of candidate genes in nutrient-sensing pathways are associated to cellular readouts following in vitro parabiosis assay.
a–m Scatterplots showing the significant correlations between markers of cell death (CC3), immature neurons (MAP2), proliferation (Ki67) and cell number on the y-axis and gene expression of candidate genes on the x-axis. The data reported here shows markers of stem cell maintenance are associated to the expression levels of 8 out of 16 candidate genes analysed. Each dot represents a participant and the line of best fit is shown in each graph. Correlations with CC3 are in red, with MAP2 in green, cell number in black and Ki67 in blue. Gene expression relative to control as calculated by the Pfaffl method. Normality was tested using the Shapiro−Wilks normality test. All Ki67 datasets did not show a normal distribution and were log transformed to ensure a normal distribution. n Table summarising the associations between cellular marker and gene expression displayed in the scatterplots (a−m). Grey indicates a positive association, black indicates a negative association.
Fig. 3Increased passage number is accompanied by morphological and gene expression alterations.
a Graph showing the machine learning results assessing the percentage of MAP2-positive cells with stunted morphologies. Control and treated passage number 17 (p17) and passage number 26 (p26) cells were compared to one another. The results show an increase in the percentage of cells with a stunted morphology in p26 cells when compared to p17 and no alterations due to pharmacological treatment. Each dot represents the average result of three technical replicates. b Graph showing machine learning results for the percentage of DCX-positive cells with stunted morphologies in passage number 17 (p17) and passage number 26 (p26) cells. As for MAP2-positive cells, results show an increase in the percentage of DCX-positive cells with a stunted morphology in p26 cells when compared to p17 and no alterations due to pharmacological treatment. Each dot represents the average result of three technical replicates. c, d Representative images for each marker are reported on the right. DAPI (blue), MAP2 (green), DCX (red). Scale bar: 50 µm. e–k Graphs showing the expression levels of candidate genes in control and treated p17 and p26 cells relative to control (p17 control cells) as per Pfaffl method. Each dot represents the average result of three technical replicates. FOXO3A (e), NAMPT (f) and GRB10 (g) expression levels showed alterations due to passage number following proliferation assay. NAMPT also showed a cumulative effect of pharmacological treatment and increased passage number as evidenced by the significant increase in expression in treated p26 cells when compared to treated p17 cells. FOXO3A (h), PTEN (i) and GRB10 (j) and mTOR (k) expression levels showed alterations due to passage number following differentiation assay. The variation in mTOR expression due to passage number did not survive Bonferroni correction. Control: media-only conditions. Treated conditions indicate cells treated with 0.01 µM tert-butyl hydroperoxide (tBHP) and 10 µM hydroxyurea (HU). Bar graphs denote mean ± SD. Two-way ANOVAs with Bonferroni correction, three biologically independent experiments. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. For graphs (c−i) y-axis are logged for ease of visualisation.
Fig. 4Epidemiological analysis in TwinsUK cohort shows age, NART errors and education level are predictive of cognitive performance.
a Scatter plot showing the significant correlation between age and PAL errors suggesting increasing age is associated to a decline in performance. b Tukey boxplot showing the non-significant association between gender and PAL error (Welch’s t test). c–e Tukey boxplot showing the significant correlations between education measure and age (c), National Adult Reading Scale (NART) and age (d) and NART errors and education measure (e). These results show that education level measured either via attained qualification or NART performance is an important co-variate when assessing cognitive performance. For (c–e), data were treated as continuous but graphed as categorical for ease of visualisation. Each dot represents a participant.
Fig. 5Physical activity modulates the association between calorie intake and PAL performance in the TwinsUK cohort.
Individual lifestyle measures showed no association to PAL errors as shown in graphs (a–d). Scatter plots showing the lack of association between PAL errors and healthy eating (a) and between PAL errors and calorie intake (c). Tukey boxplots showing the lack of association between PAL errors and adherence to Mediterranean diet (b) and between PAL errors and physical activity (d). e–g Scatterplots showing the interaction between physical activity and diet testing whether lifestyle measures can interact and thereby affect each other’s association to PAL errors. Physical activity had no effect on the association between healthy eating and PAL errors (e) or on the association between adherence to Mediterranean diet and PAL errors (f). Physical activity, however, significantly affected the association between Kcal intake on PAL errors (g) showing that calorie intake and cognitive performance can have either a positive or negative association depending on the individual’s physical activity level.
Fig. 6GEE models show genotype alone and genotype combined with lifestyle affects PAL performance in TwinsUK cohort.
a, b Tukey’s boxplots showing significant associations between the rs497849 (a) and rs782431 (b) genotype with PAL errors. c Tukey boxplot showing the lack of association between rs10997817 genotype with PAL errors and d scatterplot showing the interaction of rs10997817 genotype on the association between physical activity (IPAQ) and PAL errors. Together, (c) and (d) show that while there is no significant association between rs10997817 genotype and physical activity, the association between physical activity and PAL errors is modulated by the individual’s genotype for the rs10997817 SNP. e Tukey boxplot showing the lack of association between rs9642563 genotype and PAL errors and f scatterplot showing the significant interaction of rs9642563 genotype on the association between adherence to Mediterranean diet (MDS) and PAL errors. As above, (e) and (f) show that while there is no significant association between rs9642563 genotype and MDS, the association between MDS and PAL errors is modulated by the individual’s genotype for the rs9642563 SNP. Data were analysed as categorical but represented as continuous for ease of visualisation. Genotypes are displayed as 0: homozygous for the major allele (orange), 1: heterozygous (green) and 2: homozygous for the minor allele (blue).
Details of key reagents and resources used.
| Reagent or resource | Source | Identifier |
|---|---|---|
| Antibodies | ||
| Rabbit anti-Ki67 | Abcam | Ab15580 |
| Mouse anti-ki67 | CellSignalling | 9449 |
| Rabbit anti-CC3 | CellSignalling | 9664 |
| Rabbit anti-Sox2 | Abcam | Ab5603 |
| Mouse anti- Nestin | AMD Millipore | Mab5326 |
| Mouse anti-H2a.X | EMD Millipore | 05-636-I |
| Rabbit anti-DCX | Abcam | Ab11267 |
| Mouse anti-Map2 | Abcam | Ab11267 |
| Rabbit anti-NRF2 | Abcam | Ab31163 |
| 555 Donkey Anti-rabbit IgG | Life Technologies | A-31572 |
| 488 Donkey Anti-mouse IgG | Life Technologies | A- 21202 |
| Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins | ||
| Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium nutrient mixture f-12 ham | Sigma | D6421 |
| Human albumin solution | Zenalb | 20 |
| Apo-transferrin | Sigma | T1147 |
| Putrescine DIHCL | Sigma | P5780 |
| Human recombinant insulin | Sigma | I9278-5ml |
| Progesterone | Sigma | P8783 |
| | Sigma | G7513 |
| Sodium selenite | Sigma | S9133-1MG |
| Epidermal growth factor (EGF) | Peprotech | AF 100-15-500 |
| Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) | Peprotech | EC 100-18B |
| 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) | Sigma | H7904 |
| Accutase | Sigma | A1110501 |
| Laminin | Sigma | L2020 |
| Penicillin-streptomycin | Life Technologies | P/S |
| Tert-butyl hydroperoxide (tBHP) | Fisher Scientific | 10703571 |
| Hydroxyurea (HU) | Sigma | H8627 |
| TRIreagent | Sigma | T9424 |
| Random hexamers | Life Technologies | N8080127 |
| dNTP mix | Thermo Scientific | RO191 |
| First Strand buffer | Invitrogen | Invitrogen |
| Dithithretiol | Life Technologies | 18080-044 |
| RNaseOUT | Life Technologies | 10777 |
| SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase | Invitrogen | 18080093 |
| EvaGreen | Solis BioDyne | 08-24-00008 |
| 100 base-pair DNA ladder | Solis BioDyne | 07-11-00050 |
| 1× DNA Loading Dye | Thermo Fisher Scientific | R0611 |
| DAPI | Sigma | D9542-5mg |
| Critical commercial assays | ||
| TURBO DNA-free™ Kit | Life Technologies | AM1907 |
| Deposited data | ||
| Twins UK cohort data | NA | |
| Experimental models: cell lines | ||
| HPC0A07/03A | ReNeuron Ltd | HPC0A07/03A |
| Oligonucleotides | ||
mTOR primers Forward TCTTCCATCAGACCCAGTGA Reverse GCTGCCAGCGATCTGAATAA | This paper | NA |
GRB10 primers Forward CACCTGCCTGGCTTCTATTA Reverse TGACTGAGGAGCAGAGAAATG | This paper | NA |
4E-Bp1 primers Forward CGGAAATTCCTGATGGAGTG Reverse CCGCTTATCTTCTGGGCTATT | This paper | NA |
s6K primers Forward CATGAGGCGACGAAGGAG Reverse GGTCCAGGTCTATGTCAAACA | This paper | NA |
eIF4e primers Forward GAAAAACAAACGGGGAGGAC Reverse TCTCCAATAAGGCACAGAAGTG | This paper | NA |
IGF2r primers Forward GAAACAGAGTGGCTGATGGA Reverse CTGAGGGCTTTCACTGACTT | This paper | NA |
IRS2 primers Forward CCACCATCGTGAAAGAGTGAA Reverse CAGTGCTGAGCGTCTTCTT | This paper | NA |
PTEN primers Forward GGTAGCCAGTCAGACAAATTCA Reverse CAACCAGAGTACTACCACCAAAG | This paper | NA |
ETV6 primers Forward AGGCACCATAATCCCTCCCT Reverse GGGGTCTGCAGCTGTTTAGT | This paper | NA |
FoxO3a primers Forward GGAGAGCTGAGACCAGGGTA Reverse AGATTCTCGGCTGACCCTCT | This paper | NA |
Sirt1 primers Forward AGAACCCATGGAGGATGAAAG Reverse TCATCTCCATCAGTCCCAAATC | This paper | NA |
MASH1 primers Forward GCAGCACACGCGTTATAGTA Reverse ACTCGTTTCTAGAGGGCTAAGA | This paper | NA |
UCP2 primers Forward CCTCTACAATGGGCTGGTTG Reverse TCAGAGCCCTTGGTGTAGAA | This paper | NA |
Nrip1 primers Forward GGAGACAGACGAACACTGATATT Reverse GGTCTGTAGCAGTAAGCAGATAG | This paper | NA |
NAMPT primers Forward CCAGGAAGCCAAAGATGTCTAC Reverse GAAGATGCCCATCATACTTCTCA | This paper | NA |
ABTB1 primers Forward ACCATGAACCCGTCCTGA Reverse AAGCAGGCATAGTACCTCCA | This paper | NA |
VIM primers Forward CTTTGCCGTTGAAGCTGCTA Reverse GAAGGTGACGAGCCATTTCC | This paper | NA |
RPLP2 primers Forward CAGAGGAGAAGAAAGATGAGAAGAA Reverse CTTTATTTGCAGGGGAGCAG | This paper | NA |
ACTG1L primers Forward GGCTGAGTGTTCTGGGATTT Reverse GGCCAAAGACATCAGCTAAGA | This paper | NA |
| Software and algorithms | ||
| QuantStudio 5 Real-Time PCR | ThermoFisher | NA |
| HCS studio software | ThermoScientific | NA |
| Columbus TM Image Data Storage and Analysis System | Perkin Elmer | NA |
| Prism 6 software (GraphPad Software) | GraphPad | NA |
| R Studio | RStudio Desktop | NA |
| CANTAB PAL | Cambridge Cognition | NA |