Literature DB >> 32241804

Two Synthetic 18-Way Outcrossed Populations of Diploid Budding Yeast with Utility for Complex Trait Dissection.

Robert A Linder1, Arundhati Majumder2, Mahul Chakraborty2, Anthony Long1.   

Abstract

Advanced-generation multiparent populations (MPPs) are a valuable tool for dissecting complex traits, having more power than genome-wide association studies to detect rare variants and higher resolution than F2 linkage mapping. To extend the advantages of MPPs in budding yeast, we describe the creation and characterization of two outbred MPPs derived from 18 genetically diverse founding strains. We carried out de novo assemblies of the genomes of the 18 founder strains, such that virtually all variation segregating between these strains is known, and represented those assemblies as Santa Cruz Genome Browser tracks. We discovered complex patterns of structural variation segregating among the founders, including a large deletion within the vacuolar ATPase VMA1, several different deletions within the osmosensor MSB2, a series of deletions and insertions at PRM7 and the adjacent BSC1, as well as copy number variation at the dehydrogenase ALD2 Resequenced haploid recombinant clones from the two MPPs have a median unrecombined block size of 66 kb, demonstrating that the population is highly recombined. We pool-sequenced the two MPPs to 3270× and 2226× coverage and demonstrated that we can accurately estimate local haplotype frequencies using pooled data. We further downsampled the pool-sequenced data to ∼20-40× and showed that local haplotype frequency estimates remained accurate, with median error rates 0.8 and 0.6% at 20× and 40×, respectively. Haplotypes frequencies are estimated much more accurately than SNP frequencies obtained directly from the same data. Deep sequencing of the two populations revealed that 10 or more founders are present at a detectable frequency for > 98% of the genome, validating the utility of this resource for the exploration of the role of standing variation in the architecture of complex traits.
Copyright © 2020 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MPP; Multiparent Advanced Generation Inter-Cross (MAGIC); budding yeast; de novo assembly; haplotype inference; multiparental populations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32241804      PMCID: PMC7268983          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.120.303202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  69 in total

1.  A method for fine mapping quantitative trait loci in outbred animal stocks.

Authors:  R Mott; C J Talbot; M G Turri; A C Collins; J Flint
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Retraction.

Authors:  Paola Sebastiani; Nadia Solovieff; Annibale Puca; Stephen W Hartley; Efthymia Melista; Stacy Andersen; Daniel A Dworkis; Jemma B Wilk; Richard H Myers; Martin H Steinberg; Monty Montano; Clinton T Baldwin; Thomas T Perls
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Dissection of genetically complex traits with extremely large pools of yeast segregants.

Authors:  Ian M Ehrenreich; Noorossadat Torabi; Yue Jia; Jonathan Kent; Stephen Martis; Joshua A Shapiro; David Gresham; Amy A Caudy; Leonid Kruglyak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Generation of a large set of genetically tractable haploid and diploid Saccharomyces strains.

Authors:  Francisco A Cubillos; Edward J Louis; Gianni Liti
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Back to the Future: Multiparent Populations Provide the Key to Unlocking the Genetic Basis of Complex Traits.

Authors:  Dirk-Jan de Koning; Lauren M McIntyre
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Dissecting DNA damage response pathways by analysing protein localization and abundance changes during DNA replication stress.

Authors:  Johnny M Tkach; Askar Yimit; Anna Y Lee; Michael Riffle; Michael Costanzo; Daniel Jaschob; Jason A Hendry; Jiongwen Ou; Jason Moffat; Charles Boone; Trisha N Davis; Corey Nislow; Grant W Brown
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  Finding the sources of missing heritability in a yeast cross.

Authors:  Joshua S Bloom; Ian M Ehrenreich; Wesley T Loo; Thúy-Lan Võ Lite; Leonid Kruglyak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Genetic interactions contribute less than additive effects to quantitative trait variation in yeast.

Authors:  Joshua S Bloom; Iulia Kotenko; Meru J Sadhu; Sebastian Treusch; Frank W Albert; Leonid Kruglyak
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Rapid Low-Cost Assembly of the Drosophila melanogaster Reference Genome Using Low-Coverage, Long-Read Sequencing.

Authors:  Edwin A Solares; Mahul Chakraborty; Danny E Miller; Shannon Kalsow; Kate Hall; Anoja G Perera; J J Emerson; R Scott Hawley
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  5 in total

1.  Powerful, efficient QTL mapping in Drosophila melanogaster using bulked phenotyping and pooled sequencing.

Authors:  Stuart J Macdonald; Kristen M Cloud-Richardson; Dylan J Sims-West; Anthony D Long
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Heat Shock Improves Random Spore Analysis in Diverse Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Molly K Burke; Kaitlin M McHugh; Ian C Kutch
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Crossing design shapes patterns of genetic variation in synthetic recombinant populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Mark A Phillips; Ian C Kutch; Kaitlin M McHugh; Savannah K Taggard; Molly K Burke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Genetic Background Matters: Population-Based Studies in Model Organisms for Translational Research.

Authors:  Valeria Olguín; Anyelo Durán; Macarena Las Heras; Juan Carlos Rubilar; Francisco A Cubillos; Patricio Olguín; Andrés D Klein
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 5.  Mouse Genetic Reference Populations: Cellular Platforms for Integrative Systems Genetics.

Authors:  Emily Swanzey; Callan O'Connor; Laura G Reinholdt
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 11.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.