Literature DB >> 32241308

Lessons learned from Korea: COVID-19 pandemic.

Hazhir Moradi1, Atefeh Vaezi2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32241308      PMCID: PMC7167487          DOI: 10.1017/ice.2020.104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor—The World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a pandemic on March 11, pointing to >118,000 cases of coronavirus pneumonia worldwide.[1] On the last day of 2019, China reported some cases of pneumonia with unknown etiology in Wuhan. Approximately 7 days later, gene sequencing revealed that the etiologic agent was a coronavirus, which was subsequently named SARS-Cov-2.[2] As of March 18, 2020, >218,000 infected patients and 8,900 deaths had been reported, and the virus had reached 173 countries.[3] To control an outbreak, every country needs to have preparedness, alert, and response plans.[4] Preparedness comprises activities that began before the crisis; its goal is to create infrastructure and to empower public health workers. Alert plans comprise activities conducted to detect and verify the outbreak, and response activities during the crisis focus on controlling the problem.[5] The first individual with COVID-19 in Korea was detected on January 20, 2020.[6] Today, 60 days after the first case, statistics show that the peak of infection has passed. A total of 8,413 cases have been confirmed, and the number of new cases has reached <100 for the fourth day in a row.[3] In this study, we describe the outbreak response and preparedness activities that Korea implemented to control the COVID-19 epidemic. The outbreak alert system in Korea has 4 levels: (1) attention to the outbreak, in which the government began to monitor and prepare; (2) caution when the outbreak entered the country and the government operates cooperation system; (3) alerts regarding the spread of infection to other areas and initiation of the response system; and (4) mobilization of a nationwide response system as the outbreak spread and became severe.[7] Four days after the notification of new cases in China,[8] while the source was not yet clear, Korea started screening and implemented a quarantine plan at the airports. Those who had visited Wuhan in the previous 14 days were required to complete a health questionnaire and to self-quarantine for 14 days. If fever or respiratory symptoms appeared, they were required to call the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC).[3] On January 20, the first case of COVID-19 pneumonia, which was detected in the airport screening station, was confirmed,[6] resulting in the elevation of the infection alert level from blue (attention) to yellow (caution). In-depth epidemiological studies were conducted, and all contacts were followed for 14 days. These individuals were isolated and tested if any symptoms appeared, and all of the places where the case patients had gone (eg, hotels, markets, and health facilities) were disinfected.[3] On February 21, when epidemiologic studies revealed 2 main sources of transmission, those places were defined as “special care zones” where a specialized team focused on controlling transmission,[9] and the alert level was elevated to the highest (severe).[10] Rapid diagnosis and widespread testing were other areas of focus in Korea. The proportion of confirmed to suspected cases varied from 0.5 in the initial days to 3.9 in the peak days. Early detection helped Korea eliminate the infection from the community and restrict it to health facilities, which is an essential aspect of outbreak response. Also, research teams started their work in the very early days to develop rapid tests, treatments, and vaccines. From January 31 onward, the 6-hour test was distributed in some health facilities, and from February 7 onward, all health facilities all around the country had this test.[10] Moreover, the KCDC started reporting the situation from January 20 onward to provide accurate and real-time data. These reports included the number of confirmed cases and patients under investigation, history of confirmed cases, and prevention advice for the public. The number of the KCDC call center has been mentioned in almost every report, and Koreans were asked not to travel to China and Wuhan, to avoid public outdoor activities, to cough or sneeze safely, and to wear masks when visiting a health center. Besides, the guideline for management and screening get updated whenever needed; travel to Wuhan which was in the definition of suspected cases where changed to travel to china, and finally omitted.[10] Altogether, the main goal of outbreak response in Korea was prevention of entrance of COVID-19 and at the same time, inhibition of the spread of the virus throughout the country. These goals were achieved through 3 main strategies: (1) containment and mitigation based on outbreak situation; (2) Risk communication to attract community participation; and (3) science-based and fact-driven actions.
  6 in total

1.  The First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Imported into Korea from Wuhan, China: Implication for Infection Prevention and Control Measures.

Authors:  Jin Yong Kim; Pyoeng Gyun Choe; Yoonju Oh; Kyung Joong Oh; Jinsil Kim; So Jeong Park; Ji Hye Park; Hye Kyoung Na; Myoung Don Oh
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  How to Manage a Public Health Crisis and Bioterrorism in Korea.

Authors:  Hae-Wol Cho; Chaeshin Chu
Journal:  Osong Public Health Res Perspect       Date:  2013-10

3.  Public health crisis preparedness and response in Korea.

Authors:  Hye-Young Lee; Mi-Na Oh; Yong-Shik Park; Chaeshin Chu; Tae-Jong Son
Journal:  Osong Public Health Res Perspect       Date:  2013-10

4.  A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019.

Authors:  Na Zhu; Dingyu Zhang; Wenling Wang; Xingwang Li; Bo Yang; Jingdong Song; Xiang Zhao; Baoying Huang; Weifeng Shi; Roujian Lu; Peihua Niu; Faxian Zhan; Xuejun Ma; Dayan Wang; Wenbo Xu; Guizhen Wu; George F Gao; Wenjie Tan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Transmission potential and severity of COVID-19 in South Korea.

Authors:  Eunha Shim; Amna Tariq; Wongyeong Choi; Yiseul Lee; Gerardo Chowell
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  An update on the 2019-nCoV outbreak.

Authors:  Mohammad Ammad Ud Din; Leela Krishna Teja Boppana
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.918

  6 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  International Public Health Responses to COVID-19 Outbreak: A Rapid Review.

Authors:  Parinaz Tabari; Mitra Amini; Mohsen Moghadami; Mahsa Moosavi
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2020-05

Review 2.  COVID-19 Isolation and Contact Tracing with Country Samples: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cemal Koçak
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 1.429

3.  Public Awareness and Sentiment toward COVID-19 Vaccination in South Korea: Findings from Big Data Analytics.

Authors:  Yeon-Jun Choi; Julak Lee; Seung Yeop Paek
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 4.  Comprehensive Overview on Multiple Strategies Fighting COVID-19.

Authors:  Shaden A M Khalifa; Briksam S Mohamed; Mohamed H Elashal; Ming Du; Zhiming Guo; Chao Zhao; Syed Ghulam Musharraf; Mohammad H Boskabady; Haged H R El-Seedi; Thomas Efferth; Hesham R El-Seedi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Comparison of COVID-19 and MERS Risk Communication in Korea: A Case Study of TV Public Service Advertisements.

Authors:  Dahye Park; Jeongmin Ha
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-11-04

6.  Space-time COVID-19 monitoring in Morocco.

Authors:  Fatine Hadrya; Abdelmajid Soulaymani; Faiçal El Hattimy
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-05-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.