Literature DB >> 32240362

Evaluation of the Manchester triage system for patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Daniel Kiblboeck1, Klara Steinrueck2, Christian Nitsche3, Wolfgang Lang2, Joerg Kellermair4, Hermann Blessberger4, Clemens Steinwender4, Peter Siostrzonek2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An early diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is crucial for treatment and prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the Manchester triage system (MTS) for patients with ACS, e.g. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (N-STEMI) and unstable angina pectoris (UAP).
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with ACS (STEMI, N‑STEMI and UAP) who were triaged in the emergency department (ED) with the MTS.
RESULTS: In this study 282 patients with ACS (STEMI: 34.0%, N‑STEMI: 61.7%, UAP: 4.3%) were triaged as MTS level 1 (immediate assessment): 0.4%, MTS level 2 (very urgent): 51.4%, MTS level 3 (urgent): 41.5%, MTS level 4 (standard): 6.7%, MTS level 5 (non-urgent): 0%. We observed significantly lower mean MTS levels in males (male: 2.48 ± 0.59, female: 2.68 ± 0.68, p = 0.02) and in patients younger than 80 years (age <80 years: 2.50 ± 0.61, age ≥80 years: 2.70 ± 0.67, p = 0.03). We did not find a significant difference of mean MTS levels in different types of ACS (STEMI: 2.46 ± 0.6, N‑STEMI: 2.59 ± 0.64, STEMI vs N‑STEMI: p = 0.11, UAP: 2.67 ± 0.65, STEMI vs UAP: p = 0.26) and with respect to diabetes (diabetic: 2.47 ± 0.57, non-diabetic: 2.58 ± 0.65, p = 0.13). The in-hospital mortality was 2.5% (MTS level 2: n = 3, MTS level 3: n = 3, MTS level 4: n = 1).
CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with ACS were classified as MTS levels 2 and 3. There was no significant difference of mean MTS levels in patients with STEMI, NSTEMI and UAP. In order to assure an early diagnosis of STEMI, an electrocardiogram (ECG) should be carried out immediately or at least within 10 min after first medical contact in the ED in all patients suspected for ACS, irrespective of the assigned MTS level.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chest pain; Coronary artery disease; Emergency medicine; Manchester triage system; Myocardial infarction

Year:  2020        PMID: 32240362     DOI: 10.1007/s00508-020-01632-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  3 in total

1.  Improving the performance of a triage scale for chest pain patients admitted to emergency departments: combining cardiovascular risk factors and electrocardiogram.

Authors:  Chiara Casarin; Anne-Sophie Pirot; Charles Gregoire; Laurence Van Der Haert; Patrick Vanden Berghe; Diego Castanares-Zapatero; Melanie Dechamps
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2022-07-04

2.  Emergency Departments as Care Providers for Patients with Cardiac Ambulatory Care Sensitive and Mental Health Conditions: Qualitative Interview and Focus Group Study with Patients and Physicians.

Authors:  Martina Schmiedhofer; Anna Slagman; Stella Linea Kuhlmann; Andrea Figura; Sarah Oslislo; Anna Schneider; Liane Schenk; Matthias Rose; Martin Möckel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 3.  E-Triage Systems for COVID-19 Outbreak: Review and Recommendations.

Authors:  Fahd Alhaidari; Abdullah Almuhaideb; Shikah Alsunaidi; Nehad Ibrahim; Nida Aslam; Irfan Ullah Khan; Fatema Shaikh; Mohammed Alshahrani; Hajar Alharthi; Yasmine Alsenbel; Dima Alalharith
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.