Literature DB >> 32240311

Recruitment and retention in clinical trials in chronic kidney disease: report from national workshops with patients, caregivers and health professionals.

Patrizia Natale1,2,3, Talia Gutman1,2, Martin Howell1,2, Kathryn Dansie4, Carmel M Hawley5,6,7, Yeoungjee Cho5,6,7, Andrea K Viecelli5,7, Jonathan C Craig1,2,8, Shilpanjali Jesudason9,10,11, Jeremy R Chapman12, David W Johnson5,6,7, Lisa Murphy10, Donna Reidlinger5,6, Sally Crowe13, Emily Duncanson4, Shyamsundar Muthuramalingam1,4, Nicole Scholes-Robertson1,2, Amber Williamson14,15, Stephen McDonald4,9,11, Germaine Wong1,2,12, Armando Teixeira-Pinto1,2, Giovanni F M Strippoli1,3,16, Allison Tong1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Slow recruitment and poor retention jeopardize the reliability and statistical power of clinical trials, delaying access to effective interventions and increasing costs, as commonly observed in nephrology trials. Involving patients in trial design, recruitment and retention is infrequent but potentially transformational.
METHODS: We conducted three workshops involving 105 patients/caregivers and 43 health professionals discussing patient recruitment and retention in clinical trials in chronic kidney disease.
RESULTS: We identified four themes. 'Navigating the unknown'-patients described being unaware of the research question, confused by technical terms, sceptical about findings and feared the risk of harm. 'Wary of added burden'-patients voiced reluctance to attend additional appointments, were unsure of the commitment required or at times felt too unwell and without capacity to participate. 'Disillusioned and disconnected'-some patients felt they were taken for granted, particularly if they did not receive trial results. Participants believed there was no culture of trial participation in kidney disease and an overall lack of awareness about opportunities to participate. To improve recruitment and retention, participants addressed 'Building motivation and interest'.
CONCLUSIONS: Investigators should establish research consciousness from the time of diagnosis, consider optimal timing for approaching patients, provide comprehensive information in an accessible manner, emphasize current and future relevance to them and their illness, involve trusted clinicians in recruitment and minimize the burden of trial participation. Participation in clinical trials was seen as an opportunity for people to give back to the health system and for future people in their predicament.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic kidney disease; clinical trials; patient recruitment; patient retention; research

Year:  2020        PMID: 32240311     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  11 in total

1.  Measuring quality of life in trials including patients on dialysis: how are transplants and mortality incorporated into the analysis? A systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Hannah M Worboys; Nicola J Cooper; James O Burton; Laura J Gray
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Incremental and Personalized Hemodialysis Start: A New Standard of Care.

Authors:  Massimo Torreggiani; Antioco Fois; Antoine Chatrenet; Louise Nielsen; Lurlynis Gendrot; Elisa Longhitano; Léna Lecointre; Claudine Garcia; Conrad Breuer; Béatrice Mazé; Assia Hami; Guillaume Seret; Patrick Saulniers; Pierre Ronco; Frederic Lavainne; Giorgina Barbara Piccoli
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2022-02-19

3.  A pilot randomised controlled trial of an energy management programme for adults on maintenance haemodialysis: the fatigue-HD study.

Authors:  Janine F Farragher; Pietro Ravani; Braden Manns; Meghan Elliott; Chandra Thomas; Maoliosa Donald; Nancy Verdin; Brenda R Hemmelgarn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use in People Living with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Narrative Review of the Key Evidence with Practical Considerations.

Authors:  José L Górriz; Irene Romera; Amelia Cobo; Phillipe D O'Brien; Juan F Merino-Torres
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.945

5.  Improving management of needle distress during the journey to dialysis through psychological education and training-the INJECT study feasibility pilot protocol.

Authors:  G Radisic; E Duncanson; R Le Leu; K L Collins; A L J Burke; J K Turner; A Chur-Hansen; F Donnelly; K Hill; S McDonald; L Macauley; S Jesudason
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2022-02-04

6.  Converting from face-to-face to postal follow-up and its effects on participant retention, response rates and errors: lessons from the EQUAL study in the UK.

Authors:  Emer Gates; Barnaby Hole; Samantha Hayward; Nicholas C Chesnaye; Yvette Meuleman; Friedo W Dekker; Marie Evans; Olof Heimburger; Claudia Torino; Gaetana Porto; Maciej Szymczak; Christiane Drechsler; Christoph Wanner; Kitty J Jager; Paul Roderick; Fergus Caskey
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  A mixed-methods feasibility study of an arts-based intervention for patients receiving maintenance haemodialysis.

Authors:  Claire Carswell; Joanne Reid; Ian Walsh; William Johnston; Helen McAneney; Robert Mullan; Jenny B Lee; Hugh Nelson; Michael Matthews; Elizabeth Weatherup; Andrea Spencer; Jean Michelo; Anne Quail; Grainne Kielty; Alistair Mackenzie; Jenny Elliott; Nicola Arbuckle; Anna Wilson; Helen Noble
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  The WISHED Randomized Controlled Trial: Impact of an Interactive Health Communication Application on Home Dialysis Use in People With Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Amber O Molnar; Andrea Harvey; Michael Walsh; Arsh K Jain; Eric Bosch; K Scott Brimble
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2021-06-04

Review 9.  Evaluation of the design, conduct and reporting of randomised controlled trials in the haemodialysis population: a scoping review and interview study.

Authors:  Prachi Kaushal; Sherna F Adenwalla; Courtney J Lightfoot; Daniel S March; Laura J Gray; James O Burton
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Patient Partner Perspectives Regarding Ethically and Clinically Important Aspects of Trial Design in Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trials for Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Stuart G Nicholls; Kelly Carroll; Cory E Goldstein; Jamie C Brehaut; Charles Weijer; Merrick Zwarenstein; Stephanie Dixon; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Amit X Garg; Monica Taljaard
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2021-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.