Literature DB >> 32240299

In vitro synergy of ceftolozane/tazobactam in combination with fosfomycin or aztreonam against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Gabriel T Cuba1, Gerlan Rocha-Santos1, Rodrigo Cayô2,3, Ana Paula Streling2, Carolina S Nodari2, Ana C Gales1,2, Antonio C C Pignatari1,2, David P Nicolau4,5, Carlos R V Kiffer1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CR-PSA) imposes great limitations on empirical therapeutic choices, which are further complicated by metallo-β-lactamase production. This study evaluated in vitro antimicrobial synergy of ceftolozane/tazobactam in combination with aztreonam and fosfomycin against MDR PSA.
METHODS: MICs were determined by broth microdilution and gradient strips. The effect of ceftolozane/tazobactam+aztreonam and ceftolozane/tazobactam+fosfomycin combinations were tested against 27 MDR PSA isolates carrying blaSPM-1 (n = 13), blaIMP (n = 4), blaVIM (n = 3), blaGES-1 (n = 2) and blaCTX-M-like (n = 2), and 3 isolates with no acquired β-lactamase production detected by gradient diffusion strip crossing (GDSC). Six genetically unrelated SPM-1-producing isolates were also evaluated by time-kill analysis (TKA).
RESULTS: All CR-PSA isolates harbouring blaSPM-1, blaGES-1 and blaIMP-1 were categorized as resistant to ceftolozane/tazobactam, meropenem and fosfomycin, with 70% being susceptible to aztreonam. Synergism for ceftolozane/tazobactam+fosfomycin and ceftolozane/tazobactam+aztreonam combinations was observed for 88.9% (24/27) and 18.5% (5/27) of the isolates by GDSC, respectively. A 3- to 9-fold reduction in ceftolozane/tazobactam MICs was observed, depending on the combination. Ceftolozane/tazobactam+fosfomycin was synergistic by TKA against one of six SPM-1-producing isolates, with additional non-synergistic bacterial density reduction for another isolate. Aztreonam peak concentrations alone demonstrated a ≥3 log10 cfu/mL reduction against all six isolates, but all strains were within the susceptible range for the drug. No antagonism was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: In the context of increasing CR-PSA and the genetic diversity of resistance mechanisms, new combinations and stewardship strategies may need to be explored in the face of increasingly difficult to treat pathogens.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32240299     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkaa095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  10 in total

Review 1.  New Drugs for the Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections with Limited Treatment Options: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Angela Raffaella Losito; Francesca Raffaelli; Paola Del Giacomo; Mario Tumbarello
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-26

Review 2.  Efficacy of Combination Therapies for the Treatment of Multi-Drug Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections Based on Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Takumi Umemura; Hideo Kato; Mao Hagihara; Jun Hirai; Yuka Yamagishi; Hiroshige Mikamo
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-14

Review 3.  Efficacy and In Vitro Activity of Novel Antibiotics for Infections With Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens.

Authors:  Flora Cruz-López; Adrian Martínez-Meléndez; Rayo Morfin-Otero; Eduardo Rodriguez-Noriega; Héctor J Maldonado-Garza; Elvira Garza-González
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 6.073

4.  Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Combination Therapy Compared to Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Monotherapy for the Treatment of Severe Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Marco Fiore; Antonio Corrente; Maria Caterina Pace; Aniello Alfieri; Vittorio Simeon; Mariachiara Ippolito; Antonino Giarratano; Andrea Cortegiani
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-15

5.  Evaluation of the Synergistic Antibacterial Effects of Fosfomycin in Combination with Selected Antibiotics against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Ozioma F Nwabor; Pawarisa Terbtothakun; Supayang P Voravuthikunchai; Sarunyou Chusri
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-25

6.  In vitro potency of amikacin against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A target for nebulization strategy?

Authors:  Gabriel T Cuba; Paulo H D Santos; Antonio C C Pignatari; David P Nicolau; Carlos R V Kiffer
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.257

Review 7.  Oral Fosfomycin Formulation in Bacterial Prostatitis: New Role for an Old Molecule-Brief Literature Review and Clinical Considerations.

Authors:  Andrea Marino; Stefano Stracquadanio; Carlo Maria Bellanca; Egle Augello; Manuela Ceccarelli; Giuseppina Cantarella; Renato Bernardini; Giuseppe Nunnari; Bruno Cacopardo
Journal:  Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2022-08-18

Review 8.  Treatment options for K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii co-resistant to carbapenems, aminoglycosides, polymyxins and tigecycline: an approach based on the mechanisms of resistance to carbapenems.

Authors:  Stamatis Karakonstantis; Evangelos I Kritsotakis; Achilleas Gikas
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.553

9.  Quantification of Fosfomycin in Combination with Nine Antibiotics in Human Plasma and Cation-Adjusted Mueller-Hinton II Broth via LCMS.

Authors:  Kelvin Kau-Kiat Goh; Wilson Ghim-Hon Toh; Daryl Kim-Hor Hee; Edwin Zhi-Wei Ting; Nathalie Grace Sy Chua; Farah Iffah Binte Zulkifli; Li-Jiao Sin; Thuan-Tong Tan; Andrea Lay-Hoon Kwa; Tze-Peng Lim
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-02

10.  Convergent phenotypic evolution towards fosfomycin collateral sensitivity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa antibiotic-resistant mutants.

Authors:  Pablo Laborda; José L Martínez; Sara Hernando-Amado
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 5.813

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.