Literature DB >> 32240282

Communication Skills in the Age of COVID-19.

Anthony Back1, James A Tulsky2, Robert M Arnold3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavior; COVID-19; Communication in health care; Emotions; Fear; Health care providers; Heart; Intensive care units; Quality of life; Resuscitation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32240282      PMCID: PMC7143152          DOI: 10.7326/M20-1376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


× No keyword cloud information.
In a new, cruel way, the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has revealed limitations in medical capacity that amplify the challenges that clinicians already face in communicating with patients about serious illness. The most recent estimates of the effects of the pandemic describe a scenario that none of us have ever seen: Demand for hospital beds in the United States will exceed capacity by 64 175 acute care beds and 17 309 intensive care beds; over the next 4 months, clinicians are projected to witness 81 114 deaths (1). These statistics, though, are merely a 30 000-foot view of the territory that clinicians are seeing now, as they grapple with patients and families on the ground about how to prepare, what is happening, and what to expect. For clinicians who have received training in evidence-based methods to communicate with patients with serious illness, many of these conversations will feel familiar. Delivering serious news and discussing goals of care still work as heuristics for COVID-19–related illness (2), although clinicians will face an extra measure of COVID-19–related apprehension, uncertainty, and fear. But clinicians are also being confronted with new communication tasks that none of us have faced before, including proactive COVID-19 planning for patients who are already frail with other serious illnesses, facilitating virtual goodbyes between family members and dying patients with restricted access, and explaining decisions on why a particular patient will not receive a scarce resource. For clinicians who have not had such training, the COVID-19 pandemic is likely to be a demoralizing experience. The shortfall in system capacity will guarantee that they will run out of time repeatedly, and the usual phrases will be out of place in new situations. For clinicians equipped with a deep understanding of communication principles and a flexible repertoire, however, their expertise is already enabling them to innovate and adapt. It is not too late for clinicians to learn these skills. We have used 5 years of experience with scaling up serious illness communication skills training—our nonprofit startup VitalTalk (www.vitaltalk.org) has reached at least 30 000 clinicians—to create a series of just-in-time tips, talking maps, and video demonstrations we have made freely available (3). Our approach, which has shown positive outcomes in clinician behavior (4), patient quality of life (5), and patient trust (6), is based on 3 core principles. First, dealing with emotion is more important than giving lots of information. Unless we acknowledge the fear, sadness, and anxiety that patients and families experience, they will not absorb the information they need. Second, information is best delivered in small packets that start with a headline. When we embed bad news in a long, technical medical narrative, our patients lose the thread and miss the news. The third principle states that patient values should be at the heart of medical treatment plans. When we elicit values from patients, they feel heard and understood even when the care plans bend toward what is medically possible. The caveat introduced by COVID-19 is that our third principle yields to crisis standards of care. Under crisis standards, the ethical foundation shifts from individual values to population-based resource allocation that maximizes the most good for the largest number of people (7). Clinicians should become familiar with their state standards, which differ somewhat across the United States. When systems and clinicians are operating under crisis standards, patients will not have some choices. Triage committees will make decisions for patients that may hasten death. In these circumstances, clinicians will need to shift away from the third principle. Instead of eliciting values that drive care, clinicians will need to explain the care that is possible, refrain from offering treatments or interventions that aren't available for that patient, and instead share what crisis standards mean for them (Figure). This does not require that clinicians stop listening, stop talking about what's important, or stop empathizing—those skills will be more important than ever. But in a crisis, the third principle must yield.
Figure.

Talking maps for communication during the COVID-19 pandemic.

COVID = coronavirus disease; CPR = cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ICU = intensive care unit.

Talking maps for communication during the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID = coronavirus disease; CPR = cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ICU = intensive care unit. For clinicians, we expect that the experience of working under crisis standards will be far-reaching, with repercussions that persist for a long time (8). For us, the COVID-19 pandemic has evoked feelings that we haven't visited since the first phase of AIDS: huge uncertainty, deep vulnerability, and gruesome anecdotes. Yet back then, we were also humbled and inspired by clinicians who stepped up heroically to care for those first HIV-positive patients (9), and that personal experience shaped much of the work in communication we do now. Our hope is that the attention we bring to the communication that lies at the heart of clinical care could enable us and our colleagues to emerge from this pandemic with more wisdom and kindness. For patients and families, we hope that care from a clinician who communicates their caring could mitigate a measure of the suspicion and mistrust that seems likely to be another legacy of COVID-19. We are not suggesting that communication skills alone are going to be a silver bullet for clinician moral distress, exhaustion, and grief in the face of COVID-19. Communication is only one part—albeit an essential part—of what clinicians will need to survive well. What our experience in training thousands of clinicians to communicate better has shown us is that it is possible to get better at facing inequality, suffering, and dying, regardless of the circumstances. It takes a sense of purpose, systems that commit resources, and high-quality communication skills. We can rise to this challenge. Each of us who cares about communication can reach out to our colleagues to encourage, mentor, coach, and support each other; advocate within our systems; and keep ourselves healthy, while we do the work of our calling: communication, compassion, and healing.
  4 in total

1.  Enhancing communication between oncologists and patients with a computer-based training program: a randomized trial.

Authors:  James A Tulsky; Robert M Arnold; Stewart C Alexander; Maren K Olsen; Amy S Jeffreys; Keri L Rodriguez; Celette Sugg Skinner; David Farrell; Amy P Abernethy; Kathryn I Pollak
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Palliative Care in Heart Failure: The PAL-HF Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Joseph G Rogers; Chetan B Patel; Robert J Mentz; Bradi B Granger; Karen E Steinhauser; Mona Fiuzat; Patricia A Adams; Adam Speck; Kimberly S Johnson; Arun Krishnamoorthy; Hongqiu Yang; Kevin J Anstrom; Gwen C Dodson; Donald H Taylor; Jerry L Kirchner; Daniel B Mark; Christopher M O'Connor; James A Tulsky
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Efficacy of communication skills training for giving bad news and discussing transitions to palliative care.

Authors:  Anthony L Back; Robert M Arnold; Walter F Baile; Kelly A Fryer-Edwards; Stewart C Alexander; Gwyn E Barley; Ted A Gooley; James A Tulsky
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-12

Review 4.  First responders: mental health consequences of natural and human-made disasters for public health and public safety workers.

Authors:  David M Benedek; Carol Fullerton; Robert J Ursano
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 21.981

  4 in total
  40 in total

1.  Clinicians' Perspectives After Implementation of the Serious Illness Care Program: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Andrew Lagrotteria; Marilyn Swinton; Jessica Simon; Seema King; Gwenn Boryski; Irene Wai Yan Ma; Fiona Dunne; Japteg Singh; Rachelle E Bernacki; John J You
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-08-02

2.  A Review of Web-Based COVID-19 Resources for Palliative Care Clinicians, Patients, and Their Caregivers.

Authors:  Aluem Tark; Vijayvardhan Kamalumpundi; Jiyoun Song; Sena Chae; Patricia W Stone; Stephanie Gilbertson-White; Harleah Buck
Journal:  J Hosp Palliat Nurs       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 1.918

3.  Spanish Medical Interpreters' Management of Challenges in End of Life Discussions.

Authors:  Mary G Rhodes; Kathlyn E Fletcher; Francois Blumenfeld-Kouchner; Elizabeth A Jacobs
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2021-01-21

4.  Impact of Restricted Visitation Policies during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Communication between Critically Ill Patients, Families, and Clinicians: A Qualitative Interview Study.

Authors:  Karla D Krewulak; Natalia Jaworska; Krista L Spence; Sara J Mizen; Shelly Kupsch; Henry T Stelfox; Jeanna Parsons Leigh; Kirsten M Fiest
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2022-07

5.  The New Normal: Key Considerations for Effective Serious Illness Communication Over Video or Telephone During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic.

Authors:  Lynn Flint; Ashwin Kotwal
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  How COVID-19 pandemic changed our communication with families: losing nonverbal cues.

Authors:  Annachiara Marra; Pasquale Buonanno; Maria Vargas; Carmine Iacovazzo; Eugene Wesley Ely; Giuseppe Servillo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Case 22-2020: A 62-Year-Old Woman with Early Breast Cancer during the Covid-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Laura M Spring; Michelle C Specht; Rachel B Jimenez; Steven J Isakoff; Gary X Wang; Amy Ly; Jennifer A Shin; Aditya Bardia; Beverly Moy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Perspectives on Oncology-Specific Language During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Laila A Gharzai; Kenneth Resnicow; Lawrence C An; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 31.777

9.  "I'm Being Forced to Make Decisions I Have Never Had to Make Before": Oncologists' Experiences of Caring for Seriously Ill Persons With Poor Prognoses and the Dilemmas Created by COVID-19.

Authors:  Chithra R Perumalswami; Emily Chen; Carly Martin; Susan D Goold; Raymond De Vries; Jennifer J Griggs; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-07-29

10.  Alone, the hardest part.

Authors:  Martha A Q Curley; Elizabeth G Broden; Elaine C Meyer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.