| Literature DB >> 32240238 |
SiZhe Yu1, Yu Wang1,2, Jia Hou1, WenYuan Li1, Xiao Wang1, LuoChengLing Xiang1, DeLi Tan1, WenJuan Wang1, LiLi Jiang1, Francois X Claret3, Min Jiao1, Hui Guo1,4.
Abstract
Systematic interrogation of tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) is key to the prediction of clinical outcome and development of immunotherapies. However, little is known about the TIICs of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and its impact on the prognosis of patients and potential for immunotherapy. We applied CIBERSORT of 1090 tumors to infer the infiltration of 22 subsets of TIICs using gene expression data. Unsupervised clustering analysis by 22 TIICs revealed 4 clusters of tumors, mainly defined by macrophages and T cells, with distinct prognosis and associations with immune checkpoint molecules, including PD-1, CD274, CTLA-4, LAG-3 and IFNG. We found tumors with decreased number of M1 macrophages or increased regulatory T cells were associated with poor prognosis. Based on the multivariate Cox analysis, a nomogram was also established for clinical application. In conclusion, composition of the TIICs in HCC was quite different, which is an important determinant of prognosis with great potential to identify candidates for immunotherapy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32240238 PMCID: PMC7117689 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Study flowchart of design and number of samples (N).
Fig 2The landscape of immune infiltration in HCC.
(A) The different immune infiltration of 22 tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) between HCC and paired normal tissue; (B) The difference of TIICs proportions and CIBERSORT p-value; (C) The association between immune cytolytic activity and CIBERSORT p-value in the TCGA cohort, a.u., arbitrary units; (D) Peason’s correlation matrix of 22 TIICs and immune cytolytic activity in the TCGA cohort; (E) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of groups with different CIBERSORT p-value.
Fig 3Immune clusters associated with immune infiltration and outcome.
(A) Hierarchical clustering based on 22 TIICs proportions; (B) Kaplan-Meier survival plots of patients within different clusters; (C) Box plots summarising immune cell subset proportions by cluster.
Fig 4Immune clusters associated with immune checkpoint molecules.
(A) Evaluation of the immune checkpoint molecules expression in different immune clusters; (B) IFNG expression in different immune clusters; (C) Evaluation of the TMB in different immune clusters in the TCGA cohort; (D) Correlation matrix of all 22 TIICs and immune checkpoint molecules expression.
Fig 5Prognostic subsets of TIICs in HCC.
(A) Hazard Ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) limited to cases with CIBERSORT p value <0.05. *, P<0.05; (B) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of patients within different proportion of TIICs by median; (C) Nomogram for predicting the probability of overall survival (OS) for HCC patients; (D) Calibration plots of the nomogram for predicting OS rate at 1 year and 3 years.
Multivariate Cox regression survival analysis in HCC patients.
| Variable | Categories | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| low,high | 3.355 | 1.842–6.114 | ||
| low,high | 0.785 | 0.462–1.331 | 0.369 | |
| female/male | 0.505 | 0.29–0.879 | ||
| <60/≧60years | 0.435 | 0.248–0.764 | ||
| I,II,III,IV | 1.547 | 1.131–2.118 |
a Selected immune cell subsets are those significantly associated with outcome in univariate Cox regression analysis as shown in Fig 5A.