Literature DB >> 32240125

Nonfatal Drug Overdoses Treated in Emergency Departments - United States, 2016-2017.

Alana M Vivolo-Kantor, Brooke E Hoots, Lawrence Scholl, Cassandra Pickens, Douglas R Roehler, Amy Board, Desiree Mustaquim, Herschel Smith, Stephanie Snodgrass, Stephen Liu.   

Abstract

In 2017, drug overdoses caused 70,237 deaths in the United States, a 9.6% rate increase from 2016 (1). Monitoring nonfatal drug overdoses treated in emergency departments (EDs) is also important to inform community prevention and response activities. Analysis of discharge data provides insights into the prevalence and trends of nonfatal drug overdoses, highlighting opportunities for public health action to prevent overdoses. Using discharge data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's (HCUP) Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS), CDC identified nonfatal overdoses for all drugs, all opioids, nonheroin opioids, heroin, benzodiazepines, and cocaine and examined changes from 2016 to 2017, stratified by drug type and by patient, facility, and visit characteristics. In 2017, the most recent year for which population-level estimates of nonfatal overdoses can be generated, a total of 967,615 nonfatal drug overdoses were treated in EDs, an increase of 4.3% from 2016, which included 305,623 opioid-involved overdoses, a 3.1% increase from 2016. From 2016 to 2017, the nonfatal overdose rates for all drug types increased significantly except for those involving benzodiazepines. These findings highlight the importance of continued surveillance of nonfatal drug overdoses treated in EDs to inform public health actions and, working collaboratively with clinical and public safety partners, to link patients to needed recovery and treatment resources (e.g., medication-assisted treatment).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32240125      PMCID: PMC7119520          DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6913a3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


In 2017, drug overdoses caused 70,237 deaths in the United States, a 9.6% rate increase from 2016 (). Monitoring nonfatal drug overdoses treated in emergency departments (EDs) is also important to inform community prevention and response activities. Analysis of discharge data provides insights into the prevalence and trends of nonfatal drug overdoses, highlighting opportunities for public health action to prevent overdoses. Using discharge data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project’s (HCUP) Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS), CDC identified nonfatal overdoses for all drugs, all opioids, nonheroin opioids, heroin, benzodiazepines, and cocaine and examined changes from 2016 to 2017, stratified by drug type and by patient, facility, and visit characteristics. In 2017, the most recent year for which population-level estimates of nonfatal overdoses can be generated, a total of 967,615 nonfatal drug overdoses were treated in EDs, an increase of 4.3% from 2016, which included 305,623 opioid-involved overdoses, a 3.1% increase from 2016. From 2016 to 2017, the nonfatal overdose rates for all drug types increased significantly except for those involving benzodiazepines. These findings highlight the importance of continued surveillance of nonfatal drug overdoses treated in EDs to inform public health actions and, working collaboratively with clinical and public safety partners, to link patients to needed recovery and treatment resources (e.g., medication-assisted treatment). The 2017 HCUP NEDS data set is a nationally representative, stratified sample of ED visits from nonfederal, hospital-based EDs in 36 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.* Hospital discharge data represent the reference standard in nonfatal overdose surveillance and allow generation of population-level estimates to examine rate changes over time. Using 2016 and 2017 NEDS data, six drug overdose indicators were classified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) discharge diagnosis codes: 1) all-drugs, 2) all opioids, 3) nonheroin opioids, 4) heroin, 5) benzodiazepines, and 6) cocaine. All diagnosis fields were searched for initial encounter visits for intent (i.e., unintentional, intentional self-harm, assault, and undetermined). Polysubstance overdoses could be classified under multiple overdose indicators; thus, groups are not mutually exclusive. Annual rates for drug overdose per 100,000 population were calculated by sex, age group, U.S. Census region of facility, county urbanization level of facility,** and intent. All rates, except age group, were age-adjusted. Absolute and relative rate changes were calculated from 2016 to 2017 by patient, facility, and visit characteristics for each overdose indicator; z-tests were used to compare changes that occurred from 2016 to 2017 and for pairwise comparisons between groups for 2017 rates, with p-values <0.05 considered statistically significant. Only selected comparisons were tested for statistical significance, and all results presented were statistically significant. Analyses were conducted using SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute) to account for HCUP’s complex survey design and weighting. In 2017, there were 967,615 nonfatal drug overdose ED visits (300.2 per 100,000 population) (Table 1). From 2016 to 2017, rates for nonfatal overdoses increased for those involving all drugs (4.3%), all opioids (3.1%), nonheroin opioids (3.6%), heroin (3.6%), and cocaine (32.9%), whereas the rate for overdoses involving benzodiazepines decreased 5.2% (Table 1) (Table 2) (Table 3).
TABLE 1

Annual number and age-adjusted rate* of emergency department visits for nonfatal overdoses involving all drugs and nonfatal overdoses involving all opioids, by patient, facility, and visit characteristics — United States, 2016 and 2017

CharacteristicAll drugs§
All opioids
2016
2017
Change from 2016 to 2017**
2016
2017
Change from 2016 to 2017**
No.Rate (SE)No.Rate (SE)Absolute rate changeRelative rate changeNo.Rate (SE)No.Rate (SE)Absolute rate changeRelative rate change
All
921,337
287.9 (0.304)
967,615
300.2 (0.310)
12.3
4.3††
293,900
90.2 (0.169)
305,623
93.0 (0.171)
2.8
3.1††
Sex
Male
443,132
278.5 (0.424)
469,426
292.4 (0.432)
13.9
5.0††
172,609
107.5 (0.262)
182,169
112.6 (0.268)
5.1
4.7††
Female
478,026
297.1 (0.438)
498,064
308.2 (0.445)
11.1
3.7††
121,223
72.5 (0.213)
123,428
73.1 (0.213)
0.6
0.8††
Age group (yrs)
0–14
93,923
154.0 (0.503)
92,945
152.3 (0.500)
−1.7
−1.1††
3,918
6.4 (0.103)
3,721
6.1 (0.100)
−0.3
−4.7††
15–19
94,134
445.5 (1.452)
100,666
476.4 (1.501)
30.9
6.9††
8,426
39.9 (0.434)
7,541
35.7 (0.411)
−4.2
−10.5††
20–24
95,313
425.9 (1.379)
94,476
427.1 (1.390)
1.2
0.3
35,679
159.4 (0.844)
31,865
144.1 (0.807)
−15.3
−9.6††
25–34
189,474
424.1 (0.974)
202,987
447.7 (0.994)
23.6
5.6††
89,090
199.4 (0.668)
94,915
209.3 (0.679)
9.9
5.0††
35–44
130,904
323.5 (0.894)
141,605
346.4 (0.921)
22.9
7.1††
50,084
123.8 (0.553)
54,223
132.7 (0.570)
8.9
7.2††
45–54
125,147
292.5 (0.827)
127,210
300.2 (0.842)
7.7
2.6††
43,589
101.9 (0.488)
44,533
105.1 (0.498)
3.2
3.1††
55–64
99,521
240.0 (0.761)
108,543
258.5 (0.785)
18.5
7.7††
37,773
91.1 (0.469)
41,246
98.2 (0.484)
7.1
7.8††
≥65
92,921
188.7 (0.619)
99,183
195.0 (0.619)
6.3
3.3††
25,341
51.5 (0.323)
27,579
54.2 (0.327)
2.7
5.2††
U.S. Census region§§
Northeast
162,663
293.6 (0.742)
163,785
293.6 (0.741)
0.0
0.0
66,993
120.0 (0.472)
63,742
113.0 (0.457)
−7
−5.8††
Midwest
235,882
356.7 (0.746)
250,181
378.6 (0.770)
21.9
6.1††
79,534
119.7 (0.432)
86,002
129.2 (0.449)
9.5
7.9††
South
343,134
283.0 (0.490)
358,356
292.0 (0.495)
9.0
3.2††
104,092
84.2 (0.265)
110,478
88.6 (0.271)
4.4
5.2††
West
179,658
233.5 (0.558)
195,293
252.3 (0.578)
18.8
8.1††
43,280
54.0 (0.263)
45,402
56.1 (0.267)
2.1
3.9††
County urbanization level¶¶
Large central metro
250,565
249.5 (0.505)
284,375
278.6 (0.529)
29.1
11.7††
74,142
71.0 (0.264)
86,882
81.8 (0.282)
10.8
15.2††
Large fringe metro
202,228
257.0 (0.579)
199,486
251.8 (0.571)
−5.2
−2.0††
77,997
99.5 (0.361)
74,211
94.0 (0.350)
−5.5
−5.5††
Medium metro
214,132
323.1 (0.710)
228,701
343.2 (0.730)
20.1
6.2††
73,838
110.8 (0.416)
74,709
111.4 (0.416)
0.6
0.5
Small metro
93,891
326.6 (1.091)
92,991
322.5 (1.083)
−4.1
−1.3††
24,952
85.5 (0.556)
25,296
86.5 (0.558)
1.0
1.2
Micropolitan (nonmetro)
92,509
352.3 (1.187)
94,676
363.3 (1.210)
11.0
3.1††
25,877
97.3 (0.622)
26,256
100.4 (0.636)
3.1
3.2††
Noncore (nonmetro)
58,074
328.2 (1.409)
55,800
318.9 (1.396)
−9.3
−2.8††
12,780
69.7 (0.644)
13,414
74.5 (0.671)
4.8
6.9††
Intent***
Unintentional
580,671
178.9 (0.238)
622,351
189.9 (0.245)
11.0
6.1††
240,919
73.8 (0.153)
258,437
78.5 (0.157)
4.7
6.4††
Intentional self-harm
283,205
91.0 (0.173)
297,540
95.4 (0.177)
4.4
4.8††
33,823
10.5 (0.058)
31,682
9.8 (0.056)
−0.7
−6.7††
Assault
2,437
0.8 (0.016)
2,072
0.7 (0.015)
−0.1
−12.5††
248
0.1 (0.005)
189
0.1 (0.004)
0.0
0.0
Undetermined49,40415.4 (0.070)39,76412.4 (0.063)−3.0−19.5††17,3095.3 (0.041)13,5334.1 (0.036)−1.2−22.6††

Abbreviation: SE = standard error.

* Rates are age-adjusted using the direct method and the 2000 U.S. Census standard population, except for age-specific crude rates. All rates are per 100,000 population. Statistical testing was completed using rates rounded to 1 decimal place and standard errors rounded to 3 decimal places.

† Categories of nonfatal drug overdose visits are not mutually exclusive because overdose visits might involve more than one drug. Summing of categories will result in greater than the total number of visits in a year.

§ Nonfatal drug overdose visits are classified using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD–10-CM). ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for all drugs included codes with T36-T50 with a sixth character of 1, 2, 3, or 4 (exceptions for T36.9, T37.9, T39.9, T41.4, T42.7, T43.9, T45.9, T47.9, and T49.9, which were included if the code had a fifth character of 1, 2, 3, or 4). Only codes with a seventh character of “A” (initial encounter) were included.

¶ ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for all opioids included T40.0X1A–T40.0X4A, T40.1X1A–T40.1X4A, T40.2X1A–T40.2X4A, T40.3X1A–T40.3X4A, T40.4X1A–T40.4X4A, T40.601A–T40.604A, and T40.691A–T40.694A.

** Absolute rate change is the difference in rates from 2016 to 2017. Relative rate change is the absolute rate change divided by the 2016 rate, multiplied by 100. Z-tests were used to determine significance.

†† Statistically significant (p-value <0.05).

§§ Facility geographic regions were derived from U.S. Census regions: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/vars/hosp_region/nedsnote.jsp. Northeast: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Midwest: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. South: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia. West: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.

¶¶ County urbanization levels for facilities were determined using the 2013 National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/urban_rural.htm.

*** In ICD-10-CM, the fifth or sixth character in the diagnosis code indicates intent. Possible values include accidental (unintentional), intentional self-harm, assault, undetermined intent, adverse effect, and underdosing. Adverse effect and underdosing are not applicable values for all of the different drug poisoning diagnosis codes. In this report, the intent was set to “Missing” for emergency department visits with multiple overdose intents listed.

TABLE 2

Annual number and age-adjusted rate* of emergency department visits for nonfatal overdoses involving nonheroin opioids and nonfatal overdoses involving heroin, by patient, facility, and visit characteristics — United States, 2016 and 2017

CharacteristicNonheroin opioids§
Heroin
2016
2017
Change from 2016 to 2017**
2016
2017
Change from 2016 to 2017**
No.Rate (SE)No.Rate (SE)Absolute rate changeRelative rate changeNo.Rate (SE)No.Rate (SE)Absolute rate changeRelative rate change
All
139,326
41.3 (0.113)
145,363
42.8 (0.115)
1.5
3.6††
147,720
46.9 (0.123)
154,626
48.6 (0.125)
1.7
3.6††
Sex
Male
68,034
41.6 (0.162)
73,113
44.5 (0.167)
2.9
7.0††
101,442
64.1 (0.204)
106,466
66.7 (0.207)
2.6
4.1††
Female
71,244
40.8 (0.157)
72,236
40.9 (0.156)
0.1
0.2
46,258
29.6 (0.139)
48,146
30.5 (0.141)
0.9
3.0††
Age group (yrs)
0–14
3,575
5.9 (0.098)
3,480
5.7 (0.097)
−0.2
−3.4
99
0.2 (0.016)
87
0.1 (0.015)
−0.1
−50.0††
15–19
5,165
24.4 (0.340)
5,017
23.7 (0.335)
−0.7
−2.9
3,111
14.7 (0.264)
2,437
11.5 (0.234)
−3.2
−21.8††
20–24
10,350
46.2 (0.455)
10,563
47.8 (0.465)
1.6
3.5††
25,113
112.2 (0.708)
21,326
96.4 (0.660)
−15.8
−14.1††
25–34
25,869
57.9 (0.360)
28,893
63.7 (0.375)
5.8
10.0††
62,398
139.7 (0.559)
65,445
144.3 (0.564)
4.6
3.3††
35–44
20,452
50.5 (0.353)
22,342
54.7 (0.366)
4.2
8.3††
28,621
70.7 (0.418)
30,972
75.8 (0.431)
5.1
7.2††
45–54
24,631
57.6 (0.367)
23,894
56.4 (0.365)
−1.2
−2.1††
17,452
40.8 (0.309)
19,612
46.3 (0.330)
5.5
13.5††
55–64
26,607
64.2 (0.393)
27,344
65.1 (0.394)
0.9
1.4
9,367
22.6 (0.233)
12,027
28.6 (0.261)
6.0
26.5††
≥65
22,678
46.1 (0.306)
23,831
46.9 (0.304)
0.8
1.7
1,558
3.2 (0.080)
2,720
5.3 (0.103)
2.1
65.6††
U.S. Census region§§
Northeast
23,841
41.0 (0.272)
24,048
41.1 (0.272)
0.1
0.2
42,094
77.3 (0.382)
38,797
70.5 (0.364)
−6.8
−8.8††
Midwest
32,665
47.2 (0.267)
35,244
51.2 (0.279)
4.0
8.5††
45,744
70.9 (0.336)
50,004
77.0 (0.350)
6.1
8.6††
South
55,674
43.6 (0.188)
58,171
45.1 (0.191)
1.5
3.4††
46,039
38.8 (0.183)
50,278
42.0 (0.189)
3.2
8.2††
West
27,146
33.5 (0.206)
27,899
34.0 (0.207)
0.5
1.5
13,843
17.7 (0.152)
15,547
19.7 (0.160)
2.0
11.3††
County urbanization level¶¶
Large central metro
35,096
33.6 (0.182)
39,954
37.6 (0.191)
4.0
11.9††
36,565
35.0 (0.186)
45,025
42.5 (0.203)
7.5
21.4††
Large fringe metro
32,213
39.0 (0.221)
32,207
39.0 (0.221)
0.0
0.0
44,890
59.5 (0.283)
41,175
54.2 (0.269)
−5.3
−8.9††
Medium metro
33,229
47.8 (0.268)
36,026
51.6 (0.278)
3.8
7.9††
39,216
61.1 (0.313)
37,316
57.8 (0.304)
−3.3
−5.4††
Small metro
13,761
45.3 (0.398)
13,693
44.5 (0.392)
−0.8
−1.8
10,358
37.4 (0.375)
11,031
40.1 (0.388)
2.7
7.2††
Micropolitan (nonmetro)
14,771
52.3 (0.446)
13,435
47.9 (0.429)
−4.4
−8.4††
10,522
43.0 (0.425)
12,330
50.8 (0.463)
7.8
18.1††
Noncore (nonmetro)
8,896
45.5 (0.508)
8,588
43.8 (0.498)
−1.7
−3.7††
3,365
21.5 (0.375)
4,475
28.9 (0.437)
7.4
34.4††
Intent***
Unintentional
103,785
30.4 (0.096)
113,392
33.1 (0.100)
2.7
8.9††
131,886
41.9 (0.117)
140,419
44.1 (0.119)
2.2
5.3††
Intentional self-harm
26,149
8.1 (0.051)
24,434
7.5 (0.049)
−0.6
−7.4††
6,700
2.1 (0.026)
6,517
2.1 (0.026)
0.0
0.0
Assault
127
0.04 (0.003)
63
0.02 (0.003)
−0.02
−50.0††
111
0.03 (0.003)
92
0.03 (0.003)
0.0
0.0
Undetermined8,2082.5 (0.028)6,2091.9 (0.024)−0.6−24.0††8,4472.7 (0.029)6,9092.2 (0.026)−0.5−18.5††

Abbreviation: SE = standard error.

* Rates are age-adjusted using the direct method and the 2000 U.S. Census standard population, except for age-specific crude rates. All rates are per 100,000 population. Statistical testing was completed using rates rounded to one decimal place and standard errors rounded to three decimal places.

† Categories of nonfatal drug overdose visits are not mutually exclusive because overdose visits might involve more than one drug. Summing of categories will result in greater than the total number of visits in a year.

§ Nonfatal drug overdose visits are classified using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD–10-CM). ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for nonheroin opioids included T40.0X1A–T40.0X4A, T40.2X1A–T40.2X4A, T40.3X1A–T40.3X4A, T40.4X1A–T40.4X4A, T40.601A–T40.604A, and T40.691A–T40.694A.

¶ ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for heroin included T40.1X1A–T40.1X4A.

** Absolute rate change is the difference in rates from 2016 to 2017. Relative rate change is the absolute rate change divided by the 2016 rate, multiplied by 100. Z-tests were used to determine significance.

†† Statistically significant (p-value <0.05).

§§ Facility geographic regions were derived from U.S. Census regions: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/vars/hosp_region/nedsnote.jsp. Northeast: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Midwest: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. South: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia. West: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.

¶¶ County urbanization levels for facilities were determined using the 2013 National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/urban_rural.htm.

*** In ICD-10-CM, the fifth or sixth character in the diagnosis code indicates intent. Possible values include accidental (unintentional), intentional self-harm, assault, undetermined intent, adverse effect, and underdosing. Adverse effect and underdosing are not applicable values for all of the different drug poisoning diagnosis codes. In this report, the intent was set to “Missing” for emergency department visits with multiple overdose intents listed.

TABLE 3

Annual number and age-adjusted rate* of emergency department visits for nonfatal overdoses involving benzodiazepines and nonfatal overdoses involving cocaine, by patient, facility, and visit characteristics — United States, 2016 and 2017

CharacteristicBenzodiazepines§
Cocaine
2016
2017
Change from 2016 to 2017**
2016
2017
Change from 2016 to 2017**
No.Rate (SE)No.Rate (SE)Absolute rate changeRelative rate changeNo.Rate (SE)No.Rate (SE)Absolute rate changeRelative rate change
All
123,548
38.1 (0.110)
118,352
36.1 (0.107)
−2.0
−5.2††
27,247
8.5 (0.052)
36,919
11.3 (0.060)
2.8
32.9††
Sex
Male
50,313
31.3 (0.142)
48,218
29.7 (0.138)
−1.6
−5.1††
18,498
11.5 (0.086)
24,852
15.2 (0.098)
3.7
32.2††
Female
73,219
44.6 (0.168)
70,130
42.3 (0.163)
−2.3
−5.2††
8,745
5.5 (0.060)
12,052
7.5 (0.069)
2.0
36.4††
Age group (yrs)
0–14
3,866
6.3 (0.102)
3,563
5.8 (0.098)
−0.5
−7.9††
129
0.2 (0.019)
160
0.3 (0.021)
0.1
50.0††
15–19
9,721
46.0 (0.467)
8,951
42.4 (0.448)
−3.6
−7.8††
689
3.3 (0.124)
876
4.1 (0.140)
0.8
24.2††
20–24
11,882
53.1 (0.487)
11,278
51.0 (0.480)
−2.1
−4.0††
2,546
11.4 (0.225)
2,857
12.9 (0.242)
1.5
13.2††
25–34
23,707
53.1 (0.345)
22,914
50.5 (0.334)
−2.6
−4.9††
6,703
15.0 (0.183)
8,903
19.6 (0.208)
4.6
30.7††
35–44
21,439
53.0 (0.362)
20,776
50.8 (0.353)
−2.2
−4.2††
5,437
13.4 (0.182)
7,132
17.4 (0.207)
4.0
29.9††
45–54
22,890
53.5 (0.354)
20,552
48.5 (0.338)
−5.0
−9.3††
6,804
15.9 (0.193)
8,687
20.5 (0.220)
4.6
28.9††
55–64
18,260
44.0 (0.326)
18,478
44.0 (0.324)
0.0
0.0
4,121
9.9 (0.155)
6,787
16.2 (0.196)
6.3
63.6††
≥65
11,783
23.9 (0.220)
11,841
23.3 (0.214)
−0.6
−2.5
816
1.7 (0.058)
1,517
3.0 (0.077)
1.3
76.5††
U.S. Census region§§
Northeast
18,948
33.1 (0.246)
17,920
31.1 (0.238)
−2.0
−6.0††
6,892
12.3 (0.152)
8,040
14.2 (0.162)
1.9
15.4††
Midwest
29,863
45.0 (0.265)
27,706
41.4 (0.254)
−3.6
−8.0††
5,188
7.7 (0.110)
6,430
9.6 (0.123)
1.9
24.7††
South
49,807
40.6 (0.185)
48,459
39.0 (0.180)
−1.6
−3.9††
12,494
10.3 (0.094)
18,878
15.1 (0.112)
4.8
46.6††
West
24,931
32.1 (0.206)
24,267
30.9 (0.202)
−1.2
−3.7††
2,673
3.4 (0.066)
3,571
4.5 (0.076)
1.1
32.4††
County urbanization level¶¶
Large central metro
32,154
31.6 (0.179)
34,086
33.1 (0.182)
1.5
4.7††
9,926
9.6 (0.098)
17,525
16.5 (0.127)
6.9
71.9††
Large fringe metro
27,493
34.1 (0.209)
24,013
29.5 (0.194)
−4.6
−13.5††
6,171
7.8 (0.101)
6,901
8.7 (0.107)
0.9
11.5††
Medium metro
27,875
41.6 (0.255)
29,427
43.5 (0.259)
1.9
4.6††
6,390
9.7 (0.124)
6,948
10.5 (0.129)
0.8
8.2††
Small metro
13,829
48.2 (0.421)
11,541
39.5 (0.378)
−8.7
−18.0††
1,877
6.8 (0.160)
2,051
7.4 (0.167)
0.6
8.8††
Micropolitan (nonmetro)
12,574
47.2 (0.434)
11,083
41.6 (0.408)
−5.6
−11.9††
1,418
5.6 (0.153)
1,770
7.0 (0.170)
1.4
25.0††
Noncore (nonmetro)
8,604
48.2 (0.541)
7,229
41.1 (0.503)
−7.1
−14.7††
678
4.0 (0.157)
859
5.3 (0.186)
1.3
32.5††
Intent***
Unintentional
57,597
17.4 (0.074)
55,843
16.7 (0.072)
−0.7
−4.0††
20,758
6.4 (0.045)
30,364
9.2 (0.054)
2.8
43.8††
Intentional self-harm
57,200
17.9 (0.076)
55,583
17.3 (0.075)
−0.6
−3.4††
3,717
1.2 (0.020)
3,828
1.2 (0.020)
0.0
0.0
Assault
325
0.1 (0.006)
287
0.1 (0.006)
0.0
0.0
101
0.03 (0.003)
73
0.02 (0.003)
−0.01
−33.3††
Undetermined7,0242.2 (0.027)5,2861.6 (0.023)−0.6−27.3††2,3960.7 (0.015)2,2970.7 (0.015)0.00.0

Abbreviation: SE = standard error.

* Rates are age-adjusted using the direct method and the 2000 U.S. Census standard population, except for age-specific crude rates. All rates are per 100,000 population. Statistical testing was completed using rates rounded to one decimal place and standard errors rounded to three decimal places.

† Categories of nonfatal drug overdose visits are not mutually exclusive because overdose visits might involve more than one drug. Summing of categories will result in greater than the total number of visits in a year.

§ Nonfatal drug overdose visits are classified using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD–10-CM). ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for benzodiazepines included T42.4X1A–T42.4X4A.

¶ ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for cocaine included T40.5X1A–T40.5X4A.

** Absolute rate change is the difference in rates from 2016 to 2017. Relative rate change is the absolute rate change divided by the 2016 rate, multiplied by 100. Z-tests were used to determine significance.

†† Statistically significant (p-value <0.05).

§§ Facility geographic regions were derived from U.S. Census regions: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/vars/hosp_region/nedsnote.jsp. Northeast: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Midwest: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. South: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia. West: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.

¶¶ County urbanization levels for facilities were determined using the 2013 National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/urban_rural.htm.

*** In ICD-10-CM, the fifth or sixth character in the diagnosis code indicates intent. Possible values include accidental (unintentional), intentional self-harm, assault, undetermined intent, adverse effect, and underdosing. Adverse effect and underdosing are not applicable values for all of the different drug poisoning diagnosis codes. In this report, the intent was set to “Missing” for emergency department visits with multiple overdose intents listed.

Abbreviation: SE = standard error. * Rates are age-adjusted using the direct method and the 2000 U.S. Census standard population, except for age-specific crude rates. All rates are per 100,000 population. Statistical testing was completed using rates rounded to 1 decimal place and standard errors rounded to 3 decimal places. † Categories of nonfatal drug overdose visits are not mutually exclusive because overdose visits might involve more than one drug. Summing of categories will result in greater than the total number of visits in a year. § Nonfatal drug overdose visits are classified using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD–10-CM). ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for all drugs included codes with T36-T50 with a sixth character of 1, 2, 3, or 4 (exceptions for T36.9, T37.9, T39.9, T41.4, T42.7, T43.9, T45.9, T47.9, and T49.9, which were included if the code had a fifth character of 1, 2, 3, or 4). Only codes with a seventh character of “A” (initial encounter) were included. ¶ ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for all opioids included T40.0X1A–T40.0X4A, T40.1X1A–T40.1X4A, T40.2X1A–T40.2X4A, T40.3X1A–T40.3X4A, T40.4X1A–T40.4X4A, T40.601A–T40.604A, and T40.691A–T40.694A. ** Absolute rate change is the difference in rates from 2016 to 2017. Relative rate change is the absolute rate change divided by the 2016 rate, multiplied by 100. Z-tests were used to determine significance. †† Statistically significant (p-value <0.05). §§ Facility geographic regions were derived from U.S. Census regions: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/vars/hosp_region/nedsnote.jsp. Northeast: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Midwest: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. South: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia. West: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. ¶¶ County urbanization levels for facilities were determined using the 2013 National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/urban_rural.htm. *** In ICD-10-CM, the fifth or sixth character in the diagnosis code indicates intent. Possible values include accidental (unintentional), intentional self-harm, assault, undetermined intent, adverse effect, and underdosing. Adverse effect and underdosing are not applicable values for all of the different drug poisoning diagnosis codes. In this report, the intent was set to “Missing” for emergency department visits with multiple overdose intents listed. Abbreviation: SE = standard error. * Rates are age-adjusted using the direct method and the 2000 U.S. Census standard population, except for age-specific crude rates. All rates are per 100,000 population. Statistical testing was completed using rates rounded to one decimal place and standard errors rounded to three decimal places. † Categories of nonfatal drug overdose visits are not mutually exclusive because overdose visits might involve more than one drug. Summing of categories will result in greater than the total number of visits in a year. § Nonfatal drug overdose visits are classified using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD–10-CM). ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for nonheroin opioids included T40.0X1A–T40.0X4A, T40.2X1A–T40.2X4A, T40.3X1A–T40.3X4A, T40.4X1A–T40.4X4A, T40.601A–T40.604A, and T40.691A–T40.694A. ¶ ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for heroin included T40.1X1A–T40.1X4A. ** Absolute rate change is the difference in rates from 2016 to 2017. Relative rate change is the absolute rate change divided by the 2016 rate, multiplied by 100. Z-tests were used to determine significance. †† Statistically significant (p-value <0.05). §§ Facility geographic regions were derived from U.S. Census regions: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/vars/hosp_region/nedsnote.jsp. Northeast: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Midwest: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. South: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia. West: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. ¶¶ County urbanization levels for facilities were determined using the 2013 National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/urban_rural.htm. *** In ICD-10-CM, the fifth or sixth character in the diagnosis code indicates intent. Possible values include accidental (unintentional), intentional self-harm, assault, undetermined intent, adverse effect, and underdosing. Adverse effect and underdosing are not applicable values for all of the different drug poisoning diagnosis codes. In this report, the intent was set to “Missing” for emergency department visits with multiple overdose intents listed. Abbreviation: SE = standard error. * Rates are age-adjusted using the direct method and the 2000 U.S. Census standard population, except for age-specific crude rates. All rates are per 100,000 population. Statistical testing was completed using rates rounded to one decimal place and standard errors rounded to three decimal places. † Categories of nonfatal drug overdose visits are not mutually exclusive because overdose visits might involve more than one drug. Summing of categories will result in greater than the total number of visits in a year. § Nonfatal drug overdose visits are classified using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD–10-CM). ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for benzodiazepines included T42.4X1A–T42.4X4A. ¶ ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for cocaine included T40.5X1A–T40.5X4A. ** Absolute rate change is the difference in rates from 2016 to 2017. Relative rate change is the absolute rate change divided by the 2016 rate, multiplied by 100. Z-tests were used to determine significance. †† Statistically significant (p-value <0.05). §§ Facility geographic regions were derived from U.S. Census regions: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/vars/hosp_region/nedsnote.jsp. Northeast: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Midwest: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. South: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia. West: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. ¶¶ County urbanization levels for facilities were determined using the 2013 National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/urban_rural.htm. *** In ICD-10-CM, the fifth or sixth character in the diagnosis code indicates intent. Possible values include accidental (unintentional), intentional self-harm, assault, undetermined intent, adverse effect, and underdosing. Adverse effect and underdosing are not applicable values for all of the different drug poisoning diagnosis codes. In this report, the intent was set to “Missing” for emergency department visits with multiple overdose intents listed. In 2017, the highest overdose rates for all drugs were among females (308.2), persons aged 15–34 years (range = 427.1–476.4), persons in the Midwest (378.6), and persons in micropolitan (nonmetro) counties (363.3) (Table 1). From 2016 to 2017, overdose rates for all drugs increased 5.0% among males and 3.7% among females. The highest overdose rates for all opioids were among males (112.6), persons aged 25–34 years (209.3), persons in the Midwest (129.2), and persons in medium metro counties (111.4). Rates for all opioid overdoses decreased 4.7% among persons aged 0–14 years, 10.5% in persons aged 15–19 years, and 9.6% among persons aged 20–24 years. In the Midwest, overdose rates for all drugs increased by 6.1% and for all opioids by 7.9%; in the South rates for all drugs and all opioids increased by 3.2% and 5.2%, respectively; and in the West by 8.1% and 3.9%, respectively. In the Northeast, the overdose rate for all drugs remained stable, and the overdose rate for all opioids decreased 5.8%. Overdose rates for nonheroin opioids and heroin were highest among males (44.5 and 66.7, respectively), persons aged 25–34 years (63.7 and 144.3, respectively), persons in the Midwest (51.2 and 77.0, respectively), and those in medium metro counties (51.6 and 57.8, respectively) (Table 2). Increases in rates for heroin overdose were observed among males (4.1%) and females (3.0%), whereas rates for nonheroin opioid overdoses increased only among males (7.0%). Heroin overdose rates decreased 50% among persons aged 0–14 years, 21.8% among persons aged 15–19 years, and 14.1% among persons aged 20–24 years. Rates for overdoses involving nonheroin opioids and heroin increased 8.5% and 8.6% in the Midwest, respectively, and 3.4% and 8.2%, respectively, in the South. Heroin overdose rates also increased 11.3% in the West. In the Northeast, the rate for heroin-involved overdoses decreased 8.8%. In 2017, the highest overdose rates for benzodiazepines were among females (42.3), persons aged 20–44 years (range = 50.5–51.0), persons in the Midwest (41.4), and persons in medium metro counties (43.5) (Table 3). The rates for cocaine overdoses in 2017 were highest among males (15.2), persons aged 25–34 years (19.6) and aged 45–54 years (20.5), as well as persons in the South census region (15.1) and large central metro counties (16.5). From 2016 to 2017, rates for benzodiazepine overdoses decreased 5.1% among males and 5.2% among females. Benzodiazepine overdose rates decreased among most age groups, and cocaine-involved overdoses rates increased across all age groups. All regions of the country experienced decreases in the rates of benzodiazepine overdoses and increases in the rates of cocaine overdoses. In large central metro counties, overdose rates increased for all drugs (11.7%), all opioids (15.2%), nonheroin opioids (11.9%), heroin (21.4%), benzodiazepines (4.7%), and cocaine (71.9%) (Table 1) (Table 2) (Table 3). Most overdoses were unintentional (75% overall; range = 48% for benzodiazepines to 91% for heroin). A consistent finding across all overdose indicators, except for benzodiazepines, was that unintentional overdoses significantly increased from 2016 to 2017. Intentional self-harm overdoses increased 4.8% for all drugs but decreased 6.7% for all opioids, 7.4% for nonheroin opioids, and 3.4% for benzodiazepines.

Discussion

In 2017, a total of 967,615 nonfatal drug overdoses were treated in U.S. EDs. From 2016 to 2017, nonfatal overdose ED visit rates increased for each drug type except benzodiazepines, for which rates decreased 5.2%. The large increase in cocaine overdose rates (32.9%) might indicate potential increase in polysubstance overdose. A previous study found that in 2016, approximately 27% of nonfatal cocaine overdoses treated in EDs also involved an opioid, and cocaine-involved overdoses with an opioid reported increased 17% from 2015 to 2016, whereas cocaine-involved overdoses without an opioid decreased 14% (). Future analyses examining drug combinations could help to determine the extent to which polysubstance use affects overdose surveillance of specific drug types. In this study, rates for nonfatal unintentional overdoses were shown to increase for each drug type except benzodiazepines and for the all-drug overdose category with self-harm intent. Rates for nonfatal drug overdoses associated with intentional self-harm, assault, and undetermined intent decreased or remained stable for most overdose indicators. Results suggest a leveling of intentional drug overdoses consistent with mortality data (). Continued monitoring of nonfatal drug overdoses treated in EDs is important to inform community prevention and response activities. Changes in rates of drug overdoses varied by age group, region, and urbanization level. Decreases in rates among persons aged 15–24 years for all opioids and heroin might be due to decreases in self-reported drug use and initiation.Regionally, increases in overdose rates occurred for all drugs, all opioids, heroin, and cocaine in the West, Midwest, and South, which are consistent with increases in drug supply and deaths across these regions and states (,). For example, from 2016 to 2017, cocaine drug reports increased significantly in the South and Midwest (), and cocaine-involved deaths increased in the West, Midwest, and South (). The decrease in the rate for nonfatal all opioid overdoses seen in the Northeast is not consistent with drug supply reports, which increased in 2017 (). However, it is possible that the lethality of opioids in the supply (e.g., illicitly manufactured fentanyl)*** might result in an increase in cases with rapid progression to death, with fewer opportunities for transport to an ED for care. Large central metro areas experienced increases in every overdose indicator; these are largely consistent with results from other data sources, including syndromic ED surveillance and mortality data from similar periods (,). The findings in this report are subject to at least seven limitations. First, CDC did not assess polysubstance overdose, and it is possible that some overdoses were not classified correctly given limits of drug testing in EDs (). Second, CDC could not determine whether illicit or prescribed drugs were driving some drug-specific overdose rate increases from 2016 to 2017. Third, coding practices might vary by facility and might affect the rates presented rather than actual changes in overdose prevalence. Fourth, ED visits included unique events, not unique persons, and might reflect multiple visits for one person. Fifth, these findings likely underestimated the actual prevalence of nonfatal drug overdoses because some overdoses might not be seen in EDs. Sixth, determining overdose intent in the ED setting without necessary patient context might be challenging, which might affect the accuracy of recording of intent. Finally, hospital discharge data are not as timely or localized as other data sources, including ED syndromic surveillance and emergency medical services data. Syndromic surveillance and emergency medical services data are also available at the state level and smaller geographic areas and can inform allocation of resources at a more local level. The results might not represent current trends in overdose morbidity because of the data time lag and the rapidly evolving drug market. However, they do provide more representative, comparable population estimates derived from final clinical diagnoses than do other data sources. Overall, the increases in nonfatal overdoses suggest that enhanced surveillance, prevention, treatment, and public safety response efforts are needed to curb the increasing trends of nonfatal drug overdoses. In September 2019, CDC implemented the Overdose Data to Action (OD2A) program, that strives to improve and expand surveillance and prevention efforts for states, territories, and localities through higher quality, more comprehensive, and more timely data on drug overdose morbidity and mortality, along with enhanced and data-driven prevention activities. With these activities, many persons who would have died from a fatal overdose are now able to receive lifesaving care, including better access to medication-assisted treatment, which might be initiated in ED settings, and subsequent linkage to care for substance use disorders and co-occurring mental disorders (). In addition, implementing postoverdose protocols in EDs, including naloxone provision to patients who use opioids or other illicit drugs (), checking patients’ prescription histories in prescription drug monitoring program data, and following the CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain when treating patients with chronic pain might prevent future overdoses ().

What is already known about this topic?

In 2017, U.S. drug overdose deaths increased 9.6% from 2016. Emergency department (ED) discharge data can estimate nonfatal overdose prevalence and, because of the ability to conduct standardized analyses, track changes across time.

What is added by this report?

From 2016 to 2017, the nonfatal overdose ED visits rates for all drugs, all opioids, nonheroin opioids, heroin, and cocaine increased significantly, whereas those for benzodiazepines decreased significantly.

What are the implications for public health practice?

Using ED data to track trends in nonfatal drug overdoses is a critical strategy for expanding overdose surveillance and tailoring prevention resources to populations most affected, including initiation of medication-assisted treatment in ED settings and subsequent linkage to care for substance use disorders.
  8 in total

1.  Divergence In Recent Trends In Deaths From Intentional And Unintentional Poisoning.

Authors:  Katherine Hempstead; Julie Phillips
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 2.  The Opioid Epidemic: Moving Toward an Integrated, Holistic Analytical Response.

Authors:  Jayne B Morrow; Jeri D Ropero-Miller; Megan L Catlin; Agnes D Winokur; Amy B Cadwallader; Jessica L Staymates; Shannan R Williams; Jonathan G McGrath; Barry K Logan; Michael M McCormick; Kurt B Nolte; Thomas P Gilson; M J Menendez; Bruce A Goldberger
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  Opportunities for Prevention and Intervention of Opioid Overdose in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Debra E Houry; Tamara M Haegerich; Alana Vivolo-Kantor
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 5.721

4.  CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain - United States, 2016.

Authors:  Deborah Dowell; Tamara M Haegerich; Roger Chou
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2016-03-18

5.  The rise in non-fatal and fatal overdoses involving stimulants with and without opioids in the United States.

Authors:  Brooke Hoots; Alana Vivolo-Kantor; Puja Seth
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  Vital Signs: Trends in Emergency Department Visits for Suspected Opioid Overdoses - United States, July 2016-September 2017.

Authors:  Alana M Vivolo-Kantor; Puja Seth; R Matthew Gladden; Christine L Mattson; Grant T Baldwin; Aaron Kite-Powell; Michael A Coletta
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 17.586

7.  Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Deaths - United States, 2013-2017.

Authors:  Lawrence Scholl; Puja Seth; Mbabazi Kariisa; Nana Wilson; Grant Baldwin
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 17.586

  8 in total
  23 in total

1.  Opioid overdose survivors: Medications for opioid use disorder and risk of repeat overdose in Medicaid patients.

Authors:  Stephen Crystal; Molly Nowels; Hillary Samples; Mark Olfson; Arthur Robin Williams; Peter Treitler
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Acquired Brain Injury in Adults: A Review of Pathophysiology, Recovery, and Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Natalie Gilmore; Douglas I Katz; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2021-08-20

3.  Delayed QT Prolongation: Derivation of a Novel Risk Factor for Adverse Cardiovascular Events from Acute Drug Overdose.

Authors:  Siri Shastry; Eleanor R Aluise; Lynne D Richardson; Rajesh Vedanthan; Alex F Manini
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2021-08-27

4.  Sex differences in US emergency department non-fatal visits for benzodiazepine poisonings in adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Greta A Bushnell; Mark Olfson; Silvia S Martins
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  HIV detection by an emergency department HIV screening program during a regional outbreak among people who inject drugs.

Authors:  Kiran A Faryar; Rachel M Ancona; Zachary Reau; Sheryl B Lyss; Robert S Braun; Todd Rademaker; Ryane K Sickles; Michael S Lyons
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Non-fatal stimulant overdose among homeless and unstably housed women in San Francisco, California.

Authors:  Thibaut Davy-Mendez; Eric Vittinghoff; Samantha E Dilworth; Leslie W Suen; Carl Braun; Phillip O Coffin; Derek D Satre; Elise D Riley
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Opioid Overdose Surveillance : Improving Data to Inform Action.

Authors:  Brooke E Hoots
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Evaluation of an emergency department-based opioid overdose survivor intervention: Difference-in-difference analysis of electronic health record data to assess key outcomes.

Authors:  Dennis P Watson; Tess Weathers; Alan McGuire; Alex Cohen; Philip Huynh; Clay Bowes; Daniel O'Donnell; Krista Brucker; Sumedha Gupta
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Associations among betrayal trauma, dissociative posttraumatic stress symptoms, and substance use among women involved in the criminal legal system in three US cities.

Authors:  Sofía Mildrum Chana; Caitlin Wolford-Clevenger; Alexandra Faust; Jordana Hemberg; Megha Ramaswamy; Karen Cropsey
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 4.852

10.  Retention in Treatment after Emergency Department-Initiated Buprenorphine.

Authors:  Lindsey K Jennings; Suzanne Lane; Jenna McCauley; Angela Moreland; Karen Hartwell; Louise Haynes; Kelly S Barth; Sarah S Gainey; Kathleen T Brady
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 1.473

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.