Diana Carolina Müller1, Mikel Izquierdo2,3, Francesco Pinto Boeno1, Per Aagaard4, Juliana Lopes Teodoro1, Rafael Grazioli1, Regis Radaelli1, Henrique Bayer1, Rodrigo Neske1, Ronei Silveira Pinto1, Eduardo Lusa Cadore5. 1. Exercise Research Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Dance, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Felizardo 750, Bairro Jardim Botânico, Porto Alegre, RS, 90690-200, Brazil. 2. Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra (CHN)-Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IDISNA, Navarrabiomed Pamplona, Navarra, Spain. 3. CIBER of Frailty and Healthy Aging (CIBERFES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. 4. Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Research Unit for Muscle Physiology and Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. 5. Exercise Research Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Dance, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Felizardo 750, Bairro Jardim Botânico, Porto Alegre, RS, 90690-200, Brazil. edcadore@yahoo.com.br.
Abstract
PURPOSE: There is a lack of information on the effects of power training (PT) as an alternative to traditional strength training (TST) during concurrent training (CT) in older individuals. This study aimed to verify the neuromuscular adaptations that occurred following 16-week interventions with two CT models in older men: high-intensity interval training (HIIT) combined with either TST or PT. METHODS:Thirty-five older men (65.8 ± 3.9 years) were randomly assigned into one of two training groups CTS: TST + HIIT (n = 18) or CTP: PT + HIIT (n = 17). CTS performed resistance training at intensities ranging from 65 to 80% of 1 RM at slow controlled speed, whereas CTP trained at intensities ranging from 40 to 60% of 1 RM at maximal intentional speed. Lower body one-repetition maximum (1 RM), isometric rate of force development (RFD), countermovement jump (CMJ) muscle power output, quadriceps femoris muscles thickness (QF MT), and peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) were assessed before training and after 8 and 16 weeks of CT. RESULTS: Groups improved similarly in all primary outcomes (P < 0.05), with mean increases ranging: 1 RM (from 39.4 to 75.8%); RFD (from 9.9 to 64.8%); and CMJ muscle power (from 1.8 to 5.2%). Significant increases (P < 0.05) were observed in all secondary outcomes (QF MT, specific tension and VO2peak) with no differences between groups. CONCLUSION: CT models were effective for improving maximal and explosive force (1 RM, RFD, and CMJ power), QF MT, and VO2peak. Moreover, despite that using lower loading intensities, PT induced similar adaptations to those of TST.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: There is a lack of information on the effects of power training (PT) as an alternative to traditional strength training (TST) during concurrent training (CT) in older individuals. This study aimed to verify the neuromuscular adaptations that occurred following 16-week interventions with two CT models in older men: high-intensity interval training (HIIT) combined with either TST or PT. METHODS: Thirty-five older men (65.8 ± 3.9 years) were randomly assigned into one of two training groups CTS: TST + HIIT (n = 18) or CTP: PT + HIIT (n = 17). CTS performed resistance training at intensities ranging from 65 to 80% of 1 RM at slow controlled speed, whereas CTP trained at intensities ranging from 40 to 60% of 1 RM at maximal intentional speed. Lower body one-repetition maximum (1 RM), isometric rate of force development (RFD), countermovement jump (CMJ) muscle power output, quadriceps femoris muscles thickness (QF MT), and peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) were assessed before training and after 8 and 16 weeks of CT. RESULTS: Groups improved similarly in all primary outcomes (P < 0.05), with mean increases ranging: 1 RM (from 39.4 to 75.8%); RFD (from 9.9 to 64.8%); and CMJ muscle power (from 1.8 to 5.2%). Significant increases (P < 0.05) were observed in all secondary outcomes (QF MT, specific tension and VO2peak) with no differences between groups. CONCLUSION: CT models were effective for improving maximal and explosive force (1 RM, RFD, and CMJ power), QF MT, and VO2peak. Moreover, despite that using lower loading intensities, PT induced similar adaptations to those of TST.
Authors: E L Cadore; R S Pinto; F L R Lhullier; C S Correa; C L Alberton; S S Pinto; A P V Almeida; M P Tartaruga; E M Silva; L F M Kruel Journal: Int J Sports Med Date: 2010-07-08 Impact factor: 3.118
Authors: Eduardo L Cadore; Ronei S Pinto; Stephanie S Pinto; Cristine L Alberton; Cleiton S Correa; Marcus P Tartaruga; Eduardo M Silva; Ana P V Almeida; Guilherme T Trindade; Luiz F M Kruel Journal: J Strength Cond Res Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Jonathan F Bean; Dan K Kiely; Seth Herman; Suzanne G Leveille; Kelly Mizer; Walter R Frontera; Roger A Fielding Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Régis Radaelli; Gabriel S Trajano; Sandro R Freitas; Mikel Izquierdo; Eduardo L Cadore; Ronei S Pinto Journal: Sports Med Date: 2022-08-29 Impact factor: 11.928
Authors: Anoop T Balachandran; James Steele; Daniel Angielczyk; Mark Belio; Brad J Schoenfeld; Norberto Quiles; Nicole Askin; Ahmed M Abou-Setta Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-05-02
Authors: Alejandro Martínez-Rodríguez; Jacobo A Rubio-Arias; José M García-De Frutos; Manuel Vicente-Martínez; Thomas P Gunnarsson Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-14 Impact factor: 3.390