Literature DB >> 32238406

Prediagnostic 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations in Relation to Tumor Molecular Alterations and Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrence.

Cheng Peng1, Yujing J Heng2, Donghao Lu3,4, Natalie C DuPre5, Kevin H Kensler6, Kimberly Glass3, Oana A Zeleznik3, Peter Kraft7,8, David Feldman9, Susan E Hankinson10, Kathryn Rexrode11, A Heather Eliassen3,7, Rulla M Tamimi3,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although vitamin D inhibits breast tumor growth in experimental settings, the findings from population-based studies remain inconclusive. Our goals were to investigate the association between prediagnostic plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration and breast cancer recurrence in prospective epidemiologic studies and to explore the molecular underpinnings linking 25(OH)D to slower progression of breast cancer in the Nurses' Health Studies (NHS, N = 659).
METHODS: Plasma 25(OH)D was measured with a high-affinity protein-binding assay and a radioimmunoassay. We profiled transcriptome-wide gene expression in breast tumors using microarrays. Hazard ratios (HR) of breast cancer recurrence were estimated from covariate-adjusted Cox regressions. We examined differential gene expression in association with 25(OH)D and employed pathway analysis. We derived a gene expression score for 25(OH)D, and assessed associations between the score and cancer recurrence.
RESULTS: Although 25(OH)D was not associated with breast cancer recurrence overall [HR = 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88-1.08], the association varied by estrogen-receptor (ER) status (P interaction = 0.005). Importantly, among ER-positive stage I to III cancers, every 5 ng/mL increase in 25(OH)D was associated with a 13% lower risk of recurrence (HR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-0.99). A null association was observed for ER-negative cancers (HR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.91-1.27). Pathway analysis identified multiple gene sets that were significantly (FDR < 5%) downregulated in ER-positive tumors of women with high 25(OH)D (≥30 ng/mL), compared with those with low levels (<30 ng/mL). These gene sets are primarily involved in tumor proliferation, migration, and inflammation. 25(OH)D score derived from these gene sets was marginally associated with reduced risk of recurrence in ER-positive diseases (HR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59-1.01) in the NHS studies; however no association was noted in METABRIC, suggesting that further refinement is need to improve the generalizability of the score.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support an intriguing line of research for studies to better understand the mechanisms underlying the role of vitamin D in breast tumor progression, particularly for the ER-positive subtype. IMPACT: Vitamin D may present a personal-level secondary-prevention strategy for ER-positive breast cancer. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32238406      PMCID: PMC7284927          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  50 in total

1.  Identification of vitamin D3 target genes in human breast cancer tissue.

Authors:  Lei Sheng; Paul H Anderson; Andrew G Turner; Kathleen I Pishas; Deepak J Dhatrak; Peter G Gill; Howard A Morris; David F Callen
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 4.292

2.  Calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol) enhances paclitaxel antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo and accelerates paclitaxel-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  P A Hershberger; W D Yu; R A Modzelewski; R M Rueger; C S Johnson; D L Trump
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Michael F Holick; Neil C Binkley; Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari; Catherine M Gordon; David A Hanley; Robert P Heaney; M Hassan Murad; Connie M Weaver
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Body size in early life and adult levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Poole; Shelley S Tworoger; Susan E Hankinson; Eva S Schernhammer; Michael N Pollak; Heather J Baer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 5.  Review: the impacts of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels on cancer patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mian Li; Peizhan Chen; Jingquan Li; Ruiai Chu; Dong Xie; Hui Wang
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Potentiation of cisplatin antitumor activity using a vitamin D analogue in a murine squamous cell carcinoma model system.

Authors:  B W Light; W D Yu; M C McElwain; D M Russell; D L Trump; C S Johnson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Determination of blood pressure percentiles in normal-weight children: some methodological issues.

Authors:  B Rosner; N Cook; R Portman; S Daniels; B Falkner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 8.  Vitamin D signalling pathways in cancer: potential for anticancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Kristin K Deeb; Donald L Trump; Candace S Johnson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Molecular mechanisms linking high body mass index to breast cancer etiology in post-menopausal breast tumor and tumor-adjacent tissues.

Authors:  Yujing J Heng; Jun Wang; Thomas U Ahearn; Susan B Brown; Xuehong Zhang; Christine B Ambrosone; Victor Piana de Andrade; Adam M Brufsky; Fergus J Couch; Tari A King; Francesmary Modugno; Celine M Vachon; Natalie C DuPre; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Melissa A Troester; David J Hunter; A Heather Eliassen; Rulla M Tamimi; Susan E Hankinson; Andrew H Beck
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Vitamin D receptor regulates autophagy in the normal mammary gland and in luminal breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Luz E Tavera-Mendoza; Thomas Westerling; Eric Libby; Andriy Marusyk; Laura Cato; Raymundo Cassani; Lisa A Cameron; Scott B Ficarro; Jarrod A Marto; Jelena Klawitter; Myles Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  2 in total

1.  Levels of Vitamin D and Expression of the Vitamin D Receptor in Relation to Breast Cancer Risk and Survival.

Authors:  Linnea Huss; Salma Tunå Butt; Signe Borgquist; Karin Elebro; Malte Sandsveden; Jonas Manjer; Ann Rosendahl
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 2.  Vitamin D: Dosing, levels, form, and route of administration: Does one approach fit all?

Authors:  John P Bilezikian; Anna Maria Formenti; Robert A Adler; Neil Binkley; Roger Bouillon; Marise Lazaretti-Castro; Claudio Marcocci; Nicola Napoli; Rene Rizzoli; Andrea Giustina
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 6.514

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.