Namkee G Choi1, Renee Pepin2, C Nathan Marti3, Courtney J Stevens2, Martha L Bruce2. 1. The University of Texas at Austin, Steve Hicks School of Social Work (NGC, CNM), Austin, TX. Electronic address: nchoi@austin.utexas.edu. 2. Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health (RP, CJS, MLB), Hanover, NH. 3. The University of Texas at Austin, Steve Hicks School of Social Work (NGC, CNM), Austin, TX.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the acceptability and effectiveness of a lay-coach-facilitated, videoconferenced, short-term behavioral activation (Tele-BA) intervention for improving social connectedness among homebound older adults. METHODS: We employed a two-site, participant-randomized controlled trial with 89 older adults (averaging 74 years old) who were recipients of, and initially screened by, home-delivered meals programs. All participants reported loneliness; many reported being socially isolated and/or dissatisfaction with social support. Participants received five weekly videoconference sessions of either Tele-BA or Tele-FV (friendly visits; active control). Three primary outcomes were social interaction (Duke Social Support Index [DSSI] Social Interaction Subscale), subjective loneliness (PROMIS Social Isolation Scale), and DSSI Satisfaction with Social Support Subscale. Depression severity (PHQ-9) and disability (WHODAS 2.0) were secondary outcomes. Mixed-effects regression models were fit to evaluate outcomes at 6- and 12-weeks follow-up. RESULTS: Compared to Tele-FV participants, Tele-BA participants had greater increase in social interaction (t [81] = 2.42, p = 0.018) and satisfaction with social support (t [82] = 2.00, p = 0.049) and decrease in loneliness (t [81] = -3.08, p = 0.003), depression (t [82] = -3.46, p = 0.001), and disability (t [81] = -2.29, p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: A short-term, lay-coach-facilitated Tele-BA is a promising intervention for the growing numbers of homebound older adults lacking social connectedness. The intervention holds promise for scalability in programs that already serve homebound older adults. More research is needed to solidify the clinical evidence base, cost-effectiveness and sustainability of Tele-BA delivered by lay coaches for homebound and other older adults.
OBJECTIVE: To test the acceptability and effectiveness of a lay-coach-facilitated, videoconferenced, short-term behavioral activation (Tele-BA) intervention for improving social connectedness among homebound older adults. METHODS: We employed a two-site, participant-randomized controlled trial with 89 older adults (averaging 74 years old) who were recipients of, and initially screened by, home-delivered meals programs. All participants reported loneliness; many reported being socially isolated and/or dissatisfaction with social support. Participants received five weekly videoconference sessions of either Tele-BA or Tele-FV (friendly visits; active control). Three primary outcomes were social interaction (Duke Social Support Index [DSSI] Social Interaction Subscale), subjective loneliness (PROMIS Social Isolation Scale), and DSSI Satisfaction with Social Support Subscale. Depression severity (PHQ-9) and disability (WHODAS 2.0) were secondary outcomes. Mixed-effects regression models were fit to evaluate outcomes at 6- and 12-weeks follow-up. RESULTS: Compared to Tele-FV participants, Tele-BA participants had greater increase in social interaction (t [81] = 2.42, p = 0.018) and satisfaction with social support (t [82] = 2.00, p = 0.049) and decrease in loneliness (t [81] = -3.08, p = 0.003), depression (t [82] = -3.46, p = 0.001), and disability (t [81] = -2.29, p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: A short-term, lay-coach-facilitated Tele-BA is a promising intervention for the growing numbers of homebound older adults lacking social connectedness. The intervention holds promise for scalability in programs that already serve homebound older adults. More research is needed to solidify the clinical evidence base, cost-effectiveness and sustainability of Tele-BA delivered by lay coaches for homebound and other older adults.
Authors: Jonathan G Shaw; Monica Farid; Claire Noel-Miller; Neesha Joseph; Ari Houser; Steven M Asch; Jay Bhattacharya; Lynda Flowers Journal: J Aging Health Date: 2017-09-17
Authors: Sarah L Szanton; Laken Roberts; Bruce Leff; Janiece L Walker; Christopher L Seplaki; Tacara Soones; Roland J Thorpe; Katherine A Ornstein Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2016-02-17 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Jessamine Tsan-Hsiang Chen; Viviana M Wuthrich; Ronald M Rapee; Brian Draper; Henry Brodaty; Henry Cutler; Lee-Fay Low; Andrew Georgiou; Carly Johnco; Michael Jones; Denise Meuldijk; Andrew Partington Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Sarah Bannon; Jonathan Greenberg; Ryan A Mace; Joseph J Locascio; Ana-Maria Vranceanu Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Martha L Bruce; Renee Pepin; C Nathan Marti; Courtney J Stevens; Namkee G Choi Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2021-05-16 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Renee Pepin; Courtney J Stevens; Namkee G Choi; Sharon M Feeney; Martha L Bruce Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2020-09-05 Impact factor: 7.996