| Literature DB >> 32238195 |
Leah Cuthbertson1, Alan W Walker2,3, Anna E Oliver4, Geraint B Rogers5,6, Damian W Rivett7, Thomas H Hampton8, Alix Ashare8,9, J Stuart Elborn1,10,11, Anthony De Soyza12,13, Mary P Carroll14, Lucas R Hoffman15,16, Clare Lanyon17, Samuel M Moskowitz18,19, George A O'Toole8, Julian Parkhill3,20, Paul J Planet21,22,23, Charlotte C Teneback24, Michael M Tunney25, Jonathan B Zuckerman26,27, Kenneth D Bruce28, Christopher J van der Gast29.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic infection and concomitant airway inflammation is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality for people living with cystic fibrosis (CF). Although chronic infection in CF is undeniably polymicrobial, involving a lung microbiota, infection surveillance and control approaches remain underpinned by classical aerobic culture-based microbiology. How to use microbiomics to direct clinical management of CF airway infections remains a crucial challenge. A pivotal step towards leveraging microbiome approaches in CF clinical care is to understand the ecology of the CF lung microbiome and identify ecological patterns of CF microbiota across a wide spectrum of lung disease. Assessing sputum samples from 299 patients attending 13 CF centres in Europe and the USA, we determined whether the emerging relationship of decreasing microbiota diversity with worsening lung function could be considered a generalised pattern of CF lung microbiota and explored its potential as an informative indicator of lung disease state in CF.Entities:
Keywords: Antibiotics; Biogeography; Cystic fibrosis; Disease severity; Ecological patterns; Lung function; Lung microbiome; Lung microbiota; Microbial surveillance
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32238195 PMCID: PMC7114784 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-020-00810-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 14.650
Clinical characteristics for all patients and when stratified by lung disease category
| Lung disease categorya | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Severe | Moderate | Mild | ||
| All patients | < 40% | 40–69% | ≥ 70% | |
| Number of patients | 299 | 101 | 139 | 57 |
| Sex (female:male) | 137:160 | 39:62 | 66:73 | 32:25:00 |
| Mean age (±SD)b | 29.9 (± 10.2) | 30.0 (± 10.8) | 29.7 (± 10.1) | 30.5 (± 9.5) |
| Mean %FEV1 (±SD) | 49.5 (± 22.0) | 25.5 (± 7.7) | 53.2 (± 8.4) | 82.8 (± 9.2) |
| CFTR Genotypec | ||||
| Homozygous F508del | 153 | 46 | 75 | 32 |
| Heterozygous F508del | 105 | 38 | 47 | 20 |
| Non-F508del | 39 | 17 | 17 | 5 |
| Clinical status (stable:exacerbation)d | 86:211 | 43:58 | 38:101 | 5:52 |
| CF related diabetes | 119 | 54 | 50 | 15 |
| Pancreatic insufficiency | 250 | 91 | 111 | 48 |
| Region | ||||
| Europe | 161 | 58 | 73 | 30 |
| USA | 136 | 43 | 66 | 27 |
| CF Centre | ||||
| Bedford, NH, USA | 17 | 5 | 9 | 3 |
| Belfast, Northern Ireland | 27 | 12 | 13 | 2 |
| Boston, MA, USA | 16 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Burlington, VT, USA | 30 | 8 | 17 | 5 |
| Dublin, Ireland | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Lebanon, NH, USA | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| London, UK | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| New York, NY, USAe | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Newcastle, UK | 26 | 16 | 8 | 2 |
| Portland, ME, USA | 25 | 14 | 6 | 5 |
| Seattle, WA, USA | 39 | 6 | 26 | 7 |
| Southampton, UK | 94 | 29 | 39 | 26 |
| Warsaw, Poland | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 |
| Antibioticsf | ||||
| Amikacin | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 |
| Azithromycin | 64 | 34 | 22 | 8 |
| Aztreonam | 59 | 24 | 27 | 8 |
| Ceftazidime | 55 | 20 | 30 | 5 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 17 | 3 | 12 | 2 |
| Colistin | 59 | 32 | 21 | 6 |
| Co-trimoxazole | 13 | 5 | 5 | 3 |
| Flucloxacillin | 24 | 14 | 9 | 1 |
| Fosfomycin | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 |
| Meropenem | 42 | 16 | 21 | 5 |
| Tobramycin | 120 | 49 | 52 | 19 |
| Other antibiotics | 113 | 39 | 58 | 14 |
aPredicted %FEV1 used to define lung disease categories. bAge in years at time of sampling (minimum age 12 years, maximum 72 years), cCFTR genotype cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator genotype. Homozygous F508del, two copies of the F508del gene mutation. Heterozygous F508del, single copy of this mutation plus another mutation. dExacerbation is protocol-defined as receiving IV antibiotic treatment for worsening pulmonary status, as determined by the treatment team. eTwo patient samples from this centre were excluded from further analyses due to incomplete metadata. fDefined as having received a particular antibiotic within 2 weeks prior to sputum sampling. For brevity, only antibiotics administered to 10 or more of all patients are reported above. Other antibiotics included augmentin, cefepime, cefoxitin, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, chloramphenicol, clindamycin, doripenem, doxycycline, imipenem, levofloxacin, linezolid, metronidazole, minocycline, moxifloxacin, rifampicin, tazocin, teicoplanin, temocillin, tigecycline and vancomycin
Fig. 1Relationships between microbiota diversity, dominance and lung function. a Fisher’s alpha index of diversity plotted against percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (%FEV1). b Berger-Parker dominance index and %FEV1. c Berger-Parker dominance index plotted against Fisher’s alpha index of diversity. In each case linear regression lines have been fitted: (a) r2 = 0.11, F1,295 = 36.7, P < 0.0001; (b) r2 = 0.10, F1,295 = 31.2, P < 0.0001 and (c) r2 = 0.41, F1,295 = 202.6, P < 0.0001
Fig. 2Distribution and abundance of bacterial taxa across patients in worsening lung disease categories. a Mild/normal. b Moderate. c Severe categories. Given is the percentage number of patient respiratory samples each bacterial taxon was observed to be distributed across, plotted against the mean percentage abundance across those samples. Core taxa are defined as those that fall within the upper quartile of distribution (orange circles), and satellite taxa (grey circles) defined as those that do not. Recognised pathogens are marked as follows: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, purple circle; Staphylococcus aureus, light green diamond; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, blue diamond; Burkholderia cepacia complex, green square; Haemophilus influenzae, light blue triangle and Achromobacter xylosoxidans, black triangle. Distribution-abundance relationship regression statistics: (a) r2 = 0.64, F1,514 = 927.3, P < 0.0001; (b) r2 = 0.62, F1,581 = 961.9, P < 0.0001; (c) r2 = 0.75, F1,527 = 1549.1, P < 0.0001. Common taxa are listed Table S1
Fig. 3Comparison of microbiota diversity, dominance and composition when stratified by lung disease category. In each instance, relationships within the microbiota, core taxa and satellite taxa are given. Changes in (a) Fisher’s alpha index of diversity and (b) Berger-Parker dominance index with lung disease category (%FEV1). Boxplots show 25–75th interquartile (IQR) range with whiskers showing 1.5 times IQR. Black circles indicate individual patients and cross symbol represents the mean. Asterisks denote significant differences in diversity or dominance between two lung disease categories following both Kruskal-Wallis tests and Hedges’ d effect size analysis.(c) Variation in microbiota composition within (columns) and between (circles) lung disease categories using the Bray-Curtis index of similarity. Error bars represent standard deviation of the mean. Asterisks denote significant differences in composition between lung disease categories following one-way PERMANOVA tests with Bonferroni correction. Summary statistics for Kruskal-Wallis and PERMANOVA analyses are provided in supplementary Tables S2, S3 and S4. Hedges’ d effect size analyses are provided in Figure S1
Similarity of percentage (SIMPER) analysis of microbiota dissimilarity (Bray-Curtis) between lung disease categories
Core taxa in a given lung disease category are highlighted in orange. Also given is within category mean percent abundance for taxa. Percentage contribution is the mean contribution divided by mean dissimilarity across samples (62.3%). The list of species is not exhaustive, so cumulative percent does not sum to 100%. Operational taxonomic unit (OTU) identifications have been used for bacterial taxon names. OTU numbers have been used to differentiate between taxa within the same genus. Given the length of the ribosomal sequences analysed, species identities should be considered putative
Fig. 4Dominant bacterial taxa across lung disease categories. Percent frequency of dominance for (a) recognised CF pathogens and (b) other bacterial taxa in each lung disease category. Dominant taxon is defined as the most abundant taxon by relative abundance within a given lung microbiota sample
Redundancy analyses for determination of percent variation in the lung microbiota, core taxa and satellite taxa explained by significant clinical and geographical distance variables between centres
| Microbiota | Core taxa | Satellite taxa | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Var. Exp (%) | pseudo- | Var. Exp (%) | pseudo- | Var. Exp (%) | pseudo- | ||||
| Age | 2.2 | 3.6 | 0.046 | 2.4 | 4 | 0.021 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 0.008 |
| Antibiotics | |||||||||
| Aztreonam | 1.4 | 2.1 | 0.013 | ||||||
| Ceftazidime | 1.4 | 2 | 0.008 | ||||||
| Colistin | 2.2 | 3.6 | 0.036 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 0.042 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 0.008 |
| Flucloxacillin | 2.4 | 3.7 | 0.042 | 5.4 | 8.2 | 0.016 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 0.007 |
| Meropenem | 4.4 | 6.6 | 0.028 | 2.4 | 3.6 | 0.033 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 0.021 |
| Tobramycin | 1.8 | 2.9 | 0.040 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 0.032 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 0.007 |
| Clinical status | 1 | 1.4 | 0.022 | ||||||
| %FEV1 | 10.2 | 16.3 | 0.037 | 10.4 | 17.1 | 0.027 | 2.5 | 3 | 0.014 |
| CFTR genotype | 1 | 1.6 | 0.007 | ||||||
| Sex | 1.2 | 1.9 | 0.025 | ||||||
| Region | 1.8 | 3 | 0.049 | 2 | 3.3 | 0.041 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 0.009 |
| Distance | |||||||||
| PCNM1 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 0.006 | ||||||
| PCNM3 | 1 | 1.4 | 0.036 | ||||||
| PCNM5 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 0.006 | ||||||
| Clinical | 25.0 | 27.0 | 17.3 | ||||||
| Distance | 3.8 | ||||||||
| Total | 25.0 | 27.0 | 21.1 | ||||||
Principle coordinates neighbour matrices (PCNM) were used as potential explanatory values of distance between CF centres. Var. Exp (%) the percentage of microbiota variation explained by a parameter given the redundancy analysis. P(adj) adjusted significance value following false discovery rate correction. Clinical status is stable or in treatment for acute pulmonary exacerbation