Literature DB >> 32238045

Recommendations for Systematizing Transplant Education Within a Care Delivery System for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3 to 5.

Amy D Waterman1,2, Amanda Faye Lipsey2, Omesh N Ranasinghe1, Emily H Wood1, Crystal Anderson1, Carla Bozzolo3, Shayna L Henry4, Bhanuja Dub4, Brian Mittman4.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Early tailored transplant education could help patients make informed transplant choices.
OBJECTIVE: We interviewed 40 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3 to 5, 13 support persons, and 10 providers at Kaiser Permanente Southern California to understand: (1) barriers to transplant education and (2) transplant educational preferences and recommendations based on CKD stage and primary language spoken.
DESIGN: A grounded theory analysis identified central themes related to transplant education barriers, preferences, and recommendations.
RESULTS: Barriers included confusion about diagnosis and when transplant may be necessary, concerns about transplant risks, families' lack of transplant knowledge, financial burdens, transportation and scheduling, and the emotional overload of chronic illness. Hispanic and Spanish-speaking participants reported difficulty in understanding transplant education and medical mistrust. Recommendations included providing general education, earlier introduction to transplant, wait-listing information, transplant education for support persons, living donation education for patients and potential donors, opportunities to meet living donors and kidney recipients, information on the benefits of transplant, recovery, and available financial resources, flexible class scheduling, online and print resources, and more provider follow-up. Spanish-speaking and Hispanic participants recommended using bilingual educators, print, video, and online resources in Spanish, and culturally responsive education. Patients with CKD stages 3 to 4 wanted information on slowing disease progression and avoiding transplant.
CONCLUSION: Increasing access to culturally responsive transplant education in multiple languages, pairing appropriate content to the disease stage, and increasing system-wide follow-up as the disease progresses might help patients make more informed choices about transplant.

Entities:  

Keywords:  access; and evaluation; anonymous < body regions; deceased < body regions; education; health-care quality; kidney transplant recipient < body regions; related < body regions; transplant donor

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32238045      PMCID: PMC7430160          DOI: 10.1177/1526924820913520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Transplant        ISSN: 1526-9248            Impact factor:   1.187


  17 in total

1.  Transplant center provision of education and culturally and linguistically competent care: a national study.

Authors:  E J Gordon; J C Caicedo; D P Ladner; E Reddy; M M Abecassis
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Longitudinal progression trajectory of GFR among patients with CKD.

Authors:  Liang Li; Brad C Astor; Julia Lewis; Bo Hu; Lawrence J Appel; Michael S Lipkowitz; Robert D Toto; Xuelei Wang; Jackson T Wright; Tom H Greene
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  Reassessing Preemptive Kidney Transplantation in the United States: Are We Making Progress?

Authors:  Colleen L Jay; Patrick G Dean; Ryan A Helmick; Mark D Stegall
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Patient Attitudes Toward Transplantation as Preferred Treatment Modality in Different Stages of Renal Disease.

Authors:  A Illés; A Bugán; S Kovács; E Ladányi; J Szegedi; B József; R Szabó; B Nemes
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Patient perspectives on informed decision-making surrounding dialysis initiation.

Authors:  Mi-Kyung Song; Feng-Chang Lin; Constance A Gilet; Robert M Arnold; Jessica C Bridgman; Sandra E Ward
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  Preemptive transplantation for patients with diabetes-related kidney disease.

Authors:  Bryan N Becker; Sarah H Rush; Dawn M Dykstra; Yolanda T Becker; Friedrich K Port
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-01-09

7.  Functional status, time to transplantation, and survival benefit of kidney transplantation among wait-listed candidates.

Authors:  Peter P Reese; Justine Shults; Roy D Bloom; Adam Mussell; Meera N Harhay; Peter Abt; Matthew Levine; Kirsten L Johansen; Jason T Karlawish; Harold I Feldman
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 8.860

8.  Knowledge deficit of patients with stage 1-4 CKD: a focus group study.

Authors:  Pamela A Lopez-Vargas; Allison Tong; Richard K S Phoon; Steven J Chadban; Yvonne Shen; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  Nephrology (Carlton)       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Education Strategies in Dialysis Centers Associated With Increased Transplant Wait-listing Rates.

Authors:  Amy D Waterman; John D Peipert; Huiling Xiao; Christina J Goalby; Satoru Kawakita; Yujie Cui; Krista L Lentine
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.385

Review 10.  The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  R L Morton; A Tong; K Howard; P Snelling; A C Webster
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-01-19
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  A scoping review of inequities in access to organ transplant in the United States.

Authors:  Christine Park; Mandisa-Maia Jones; Samantha Kaplan; Felicitas L Koller; Julius M Wilder; L Ebony Boulware; Lisa M McElroy
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2022-02-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.