Literature DB >> 32236779

Geographic disparities in access to glioblastoma treatment based on Hispanic ethnicity in the United States: Insights from a national database.

Victor M Lu1,2, Ashish H Shah3, Daniel G Eichberg3, Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa4, Yoshua Esquenazi5, Ricardo J Komotar3, Michael E Ivan3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Access to treatment for glioblastoma (GBM) can be impacted by multiple demographic parameters. Barriers specific to the Hispanic population of the United States (US) are not fully understood. Therefore, the aim of this study was to elucidate geographic disparities for access to GBM treatment in the US Hispanic population.
METHODS: All GBM patients with known Hispanic ethnicity status (and Caucasian race) in the US National Cancer Database (NCDB) between the years 2005-2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Treatment statuses of surgical resection, chemotherapy, radiation therapy and triple therapy (resection, chemotherapy and radiation) were summarized, and analyzed by comparison and regression analyses over US Census regions.
RESULTS: A total cohort size of 40,232 Caucasian GBM patients were included, with 3,111 (8%) identifying as Hispanic. The odds of treatment by chemotherapy (OR 0.78, P < 0.01), radiation therapy (OR 0.82, P < 0.01) and triple therapy (OR 0.84, P < 0.01) were all significantly lower in the Hispanic group versus non-Hispanic group. The odds of being treated in the Hispanic group were significantly lower in multiple Census regions with respect to surgical resection (New England, OR 0.51; Mountain, OR 0.68), chemotherapy (East North Central, OR 0.77; Middle Atlantic, OR 0.71; Pacific, OR 0.77), radiation therapy (Middle Atlantic, OR 0.77) and triple therapy (New England, OR 0.49; Middle Atlantic, OR 0.87; Pacific, OR 0.84). Significant barriers to triple therapy in the Hispanic group within these regions were older age (OR 0.97; P < 0.01), treatment in a community facility (OR 0.85, P = 0.03), lack of insurance (OR 0.71, P = 0.03), yearly income < $40,227 (OR 0.69, P < 0.01), low education levels (OR 0.75, P = 0.03) and presence of co-morbidity (OR 0.82; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Currently in the US, there exists heterogenous geographic disparities for Hispanic GBM patients to access different treatments compared to non-Hispanic patients. Multiple circumstances can influence access to treatment within the Hispanic community of these regions, and greater investigation with more granularity required to reveal mechanisms in which these disparities may be addressed in the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Access; Chemotherapy; Glioblastoma; Hispanic; Radiation; Surgery; United States

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32236779     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03480-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  8 in total

1.  Predicting access to postoperative treatment after glioblastoma resection: an analysis of neighborhood-level disadvantage using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI).

Authors:  Krissia M Rivera Perla; Oliver Y Tang; Shayla N M Durfey; Tito Vivas-Buitrago; Wendy J Sherman; Ian Parney; Joon H Uhm; Alyx B Porter; Heinrich Elinzano; Steven A Toms; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Distinct survival and clinical profile of infantile glioblastoma: insights from a national database.

Authors:  Victor M Lu; Daniel G Eichberg; Evan M Luther; Ashish H Shah; David J Daniels; Ossama M Maher; Toba N Niazi
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Racial disparities in pediatric malignant glioma management: current state of affairs in the United States.

Authors:  Victor M Lu; Toba N Niazi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 4.506

4.  Racial/ethnic disparities in treatment pattern and time to treatment for adults with glioblastoma in the US.

Authors:  Quinn T Ostrom; Halle L Krebs; Nirav Patil; Gino Cioffi; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Prognosticating survival of pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) by grade.

Authors:  Victor M Lu; Evan M Luther; Daniel G Eichberg; Alexis A Morell; Ashish H Shah; Ricardo J Komotar; Michael E Ivan
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  The Impact of Socioeconomic Risk Factors on the Survival Outcomes of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Cross-analysis of a Population-based Registry and a Tertiary Care Center.

Authors:  Laura A Evans; Ronald Go; Rahma Warsame; Bharat Nandakumar; Francis K Buadi; Angela Dispenzieri; David Dingli; Martha Q Lacy; Suzanne R Hayman; Prashant Kapoor; Nelson Leung; Amie Fonder; Miriam Hobbs; Yi Lisa Hwa; Eli Muchtar; Taxiarchis V Kourelis; Stephen Russell; John A Lust; Yi Lin; Mustaqeem Siddiqui; Robert A Kyle; Morie A Gertz; S Vincent Rajkumar; Shaji Kumar; Wilson I Gonsalves
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2021-02-17

7.  The impact of hospital safety-net status on inpatient outcomes for brain tumor craniotomy: a 10-year nationwide analysis.

Authors:  Oliver Y Tang; Krissia M Rivera Perla; Rachel K Lim; Robert J Weil; Steven A Toms
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2020-12-01

8.  Disparities in Reported Testing for 1p/19q Codeletion in Oligodendroglioma and Oligoastrocytoma Patients: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Jad Zreik; Panagiotis Kerezoudis; Mohammed Ali Alvi; Yagiz U Yolcu; Sani H Kizilbash
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 6.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.