Richard Melien1,2, Patrick Garidel2, Dariush Hinderberger1, Michaela Blech3. 1. Institute of Chemistry, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, von-Danckelmann-Platz 4, DE-06120, Halle, Saale, Germany. 2. Pharmaceutical Development Biologicals, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Birkendorferstrasse 65, DE-88397, Biberach, Germany. 3. Pharmaceutical Development Biologicals, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Birkendorferstrasse 65, DE-88397, Biberach, Germany. michaela.blech@boehringer-ingelheim.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Predicting thermal protein stability is of major interest in the development of protein-based biopharmaceuticals. Therefore, this study provides a predictive tool for determining transition enthalpies, which can be used for ranking different proteins according to their thermal stability. METHODS: Unfolding and aggregation profiles of eight different therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) of type G, isotype 1 were investigated. The unfolding profiles were determined by intrinsic fluorescence (IF) spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). A three-state unfolding fitting model was used to determine thermodynamic parameters for macromolecular multi-domain mAbs in IF experiments, like the van't Hoff enthalpy change (∆Hvh) and the entropy change (∆S) of the unfolding event. The derived values were compared to thermodynamic parameters obtained directly by calorimetry. Moreover, differences in the Fab enthalpies were used to predict aggregation behavior and protein thermal stabilities. To do so, the liquid-formulated mAbs were investigated exemplarily by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) after accelerated thermal-induced stress conditions. RESULTS: Comparing the thermodynamic parameters derived from IF spectroscopy and DSC resulted in similar values. Data generated by thermal-induced stress at 40°C show similar stability ranking as postulated through the Fab enthalpies for mAbs in two different formulations, while at 25°C a meaningful ranking is not possible, because distinct differences in the thermal stability cannot be observed. The additional consideration of Fab enthalpies to predict the 40 °C SEC ranking seems to be more reliable compared to the use of exclusively the melting temperatures or aggregation onset temperatures and times. CONCLUSION: We show that thermodynamic profiling can help predicting unfolding and aggregation properties of therapeutic mAbs at 40°C. Therefore, analyzing thermodynamic unfolding parameters is a useful and supportive tool discriminating thermal stability profiles of mAbs for further pharmaceutical development and clinical studies.
PURPOSE: Predicting thermal protein stability is of major interest in the development of protein-based biopharmaceuticals. Therefore, this study provides a predictive tool for determining transition enthalpies, which can be used for ranking different proteins according to their thermal stability. METHODS: Unfolding and aggregation profiles of eight different therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) of type G, isotype 1 were investigated. The unfolding profiles were determined by intrinsic fluorescence (IF) spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). A three-state unfolding fitting model was used to determine thermodynamic parameters for macromolecular multi-domain mAbs in IF experiments, like the van't Hoff enthalpy change (∆Hvh) and the entropy change (∆S) of the unfolding event. The derived values were compared to thermodynamic parameters obtained directly by calorimetry. Moreover, differences in the Fab enthalpies were used to predict aggregation behavior and protein thermal stabilities. To do so, the liquid-formulated mAbs were investigated exemplarily by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) after accelerated thermal-induced stress conditions. RESULTS: Comparing the thermodynamic parameters derived from IF spectroscopy and DSC resulted in similar values. Data generated by thermal-induced stress at 40°C show similar stability ranking as postulated through the Fab enthalpies for mAbs in two different formulations, while at 25°C a meaningful ranking is not possible, because distinct differences in the thermal stability cannot be observed. The additional consideration of Fab enthalpies to predict the 40 °C SEC ranking seems to be more reliable compared to the use of exclusively the melting temperatures or aggregation onset temperatures and times. CONCLUSION: We show that thermodynamic profiling can help predicting unfolding and aggregation properties of therapeutic mAbs at 40°C. Therefore, analyzing thermodynamic unfolding parameters is a useful and supportive tool discriminating thermal stability profiles of mAbs for further pharmaceutical development and clinical studies.
Authors: Jan Kubelka; Eric R Henry; Troy Cellmer; James Hofrichter; William A Eaton Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-11-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: John den Engelsman; Patrick Garidel; Ronald Smulders; Hans Koll; Bryan Smith; Stefan Bassarab; Andreas Seidl; Otmar Hainzl; Wim Jiskoot Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2010-10-23 Impact factor: 4.200