Literature DB >> 32236399

Feasibility of Using a Wearable Biosensor Device in Patients at Risk for Alzheimer's Disease Dementia.

N Saif1, P Yan, K Niotis, O Scheyer, A Rahman, M Berkowitz, R Krikorian, H Hristov, G Sadek, S Bellara, R S Isaacson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common and most costly chronic neurodegenerative disease globally. AD develops over an extended period prior to cognitive symptoms, leaving a "window of opportunity" for targeted risk-reduction interventions. Further, this pre-dementia phase includes early physiological changes in sleep and autonomic regulation, for which wearable biosensor devices may offer a convenient and cost-effective method to assess AD-risk.
METHODS: Patients with a family history of AD and no or minimal cognitive complaints were recruited from the Alzheimer's Prevention Clinic at Weill Cornell Medicine and New York-Presbyterian. Of the 40 consecutive patients screened, 34 (85%) agreed to wear a wearable biosensor device (WHOOP). One subject (2.5%) lost the device prior to data collection. Of the remaining subjects, 24 were classified as normal cognition and were asymptomatic, 6 were classified as subjective cognitive decline, and 3 were amyloid-positive (one with pre-clinical AD, one with pre-clinical Lewy-Body Dementia, and one with mild cognitive impairment due to AD). Sleep-cycle, autonomic (heart rate variability [HRV]) and activity measures were collected via WHOOP. Blood biomarkers and neuropsychological testing sensitive to cognitive changes in pre-clinical AD were obtained. Participants completed surveys assessing their sleep-patterns, exercise habits, and attitudes towards WHOOP. The goal of this prospective observational study was to determine the feasibility of using a wrist-worn biosensor device in patients at-risk for AD dementia. Unsupervised machine learning was performed to first separate participants into distinct phenotypic groups using the multivariate biometric data. Additional statistical analyses were conducted to examine correlations between individual biometric measures and cognitive performance.
RESULTS: 27 (81.8%) participants completed the follow-up surveys. Twenty-four participants (88.9%) were satisfied with WHOOP after six months, and twenty-three (85.2%) wanted to continue wearing WHOOP. K-means clustering separated participants into two groups. Group 1 was older, had lower HRV, and spent more time in slow-wave sleep (SWS) than Group 2. Group 1 performed better on two cognitive tests assessing executive function: Flanker Inhibitory Attention/Control (FIAC) (p=.031), and Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS) (p=.061). In Group 1, DCCS was correlated with SWS (ρ=.68, p=0.024) and HRV (ρ=.6, p=0.019). In Group 2, DCCS was correlated with HRV (ρ=.55, p=0.018). There were no significant differences in blood biomarkers between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Wearable biosensor devices may be a feasible tool to assess AD-related physiological changes. Longitudinal collection of sleep and HRV data may potentially be a non-invasive method for monitoring cognitive changes related to pre-clinical AD. Further study is warranted in larger populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease ; actinography; biosensor devices; early detection; unsupervised machine learning

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32236399      PMCID: PMC8202529          DOI: 10.14283/jpad.2019.39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prev Alzheimers Dis        ISSN: 2274-5807


  28 in total

1.  Cholinergic nucleus basalis tauopathy emerges early in the aging-MCI-AD continuum.

Authors:  Marsel Mesulam; Pamela Shaw; Deborah Mash; Sandra Weintraub
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 2.  Feeling validated yet? A scoping review of the use of consumer-targeted wearable and mobile technology to measure and improve sleep.

Authors:  Kelly Glazer Baron; Jennifer Duffecy; Mark A Berendsen; Ivy Cheung Mason; Emily G Lattie; Natalie C Manalo
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 11.609

3.  The prefrontal cortex in sleep.

Authors:  Amir Muzur; Edward F. Pace-Schott; J Allan Hobson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Meta-analysis of quantitative sleep parameters from childhood to old age in healthy individuals: developing normative sleep values across the human lifespan.

Authors:  Maurice M Ohayon; Mary A Carskadon; Christian Guilleminault; Michael V Vitiello
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 5.849

5.  Orexinergic system dysregulation, sleep impairment, and cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Claudio Liguori; Andrea Romigi; Marzia Nuccetelli; Silvana Zannino; Giuseppe Sancesario; Alessandro Martorana; Maria Albanese; Nicola Biagio Mercuri; Francesca Izzi; Sergio Bernardini; Alessandra Nitti; Giulia M Sancesario; Francesco Sica; Maria G Marciani; Fabio Placidi
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 18.302

Review 6.  A quantitative systematic review of normal values for short-term heart rate variability in healthy adults.

Authors:  David Nunan; Gavin R H Sandercock; David A Brodie
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Modification of the relationship of the apolipoprotein E ε4 allele to the risk of Alzheimer disease and neurofibrillary tangle density by sleep.

Authors:  Andrew S P Lim; Lei Yu; Matthew Kowgier; Julie A Schneider; Aron S Buchman; David A Bennett
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 18.302

Review 8.  The Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA) among older adults.

Authors:  Tari D Topolski; James LoGerfo; Donald L Patrick; Barbara Williams; Julie Walwick; Marsha B Patrick
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 9.  Mechanisms of Risk Reduction in the Clinical Practice of Alzheimer's Disease Prevention.

Authors:  Matthew W Schelke; Peter Attia; Daniel J Palenchar; Bob Kaplan; Monica Mureb; Christine A Ganzer; Olivia Scheyer; Aneela Rahman; Robert Kachko; Robert Krikorian; Lisa Mosconi; Richard S Isaacson
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 5.750

10.  Prefrontal atrophy, disrupted NREM slow waves and impaired hippocampal-dependent memory in aging.

Authors:  Bryce A Mander; Vikram Rao; Brandon Lu; Jared M Saletin; John R Lindquist; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; William Jagust; Matthew P Walker
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-27       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Personalized Healthcare for Dementia.

Authors:  Seunghyeon Lee; Eun-Jeong Cho; Hyo-Bum Kwak
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-28

2.  The Effective Cognitive Assessment and Training Methods for COVID-19 Patients With Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Dong Wen; Jian Xu; Zhonglin Wu; Yijun Liu; Yanhong Zhou; Jingjing Li; Shaochang Wang; Xianlin Dong; M Iqbal Saripan; Haiqing Song
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 3.  The Impact of Wearable Technologies in Health Research: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Sophie Huhn; Miriam Axt; Hanns-Christian Gunga; Martina Anna Maggioni; Stephen Munga; David Obor; Ali Sié; Valentin Boudo; Aditi Bunker; Rainer Sauerborn; Till Bärnighausen; Sandra Barteit
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 4.  The Road to Personalized Medicine in Alzheimer's Disease: The Use of Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Anuschka Silva-Spínola; Inês Baldeiras; Joel P Arrais; Isabel Santana
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-01-29

Review 5.  Recent Trends and Practices Toward Assessment and Rehabilitation of Neurodegenerative Disorders: Insights From Human Gait.

Authors:  Ratan Das; Sudip Paul; Gajendra Kumar Mourya; Neelesh Kumar; Masaraf Hussain
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 5.152

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.