| Literature DB >> 32236147 |
Agata Cebula1, Anna Katarzyna Tyka2, Aleksander Tyka3, Tomasz Pałka3, Wanda Pilch4, Lidia Luty5, Dariusz Mucha1.
Abstract
This study examined the effects of a 6-week Nordic Walking (NW) training, at the intensity corresponding to the dominance of lipid metabolism, on the levels of selected physiological indices, the haemodynamic indices of the cardiovascular system and physical fitness in sedentary women older than 55 years of age. In addition, the physiological response of the female body to the walking effort on treadmill with poles (NW) and without poles (W) was compared and the influence of training on this response was determined. A single group study with a pre-test/post-test study design was conducted. Eighteen women performed NW controlled intensity training 3 times a week for 6 weeks. Body composition, resting blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) as well as circulatory and respiratory indices in two graded walking efforts on mechanical treadmill NW and W were measured before and after training period. The intensity of workouts, which considered the dominance of lipid metabolism, was determined individually, based on the dynamics of changes in the level of physiological indices during the graded intensity NW. After the course of training, body mass, fat mass, resting BP and HR decreased significantly (p < 0.05). HR and respiratory exchange ratio recorded during NW and W at 1.75 m.s-1 walking speed decreased, while the oxygen pulse increased (p < 0.05). VO2max increased significantly (p < 0.05). Before and after the training period HR, oxygen uptake per minute, and energy expenditure during NW were significantly higher than in W (p < 0.05). The study showed that 6-week NW training at the intensity corresponding to the dominance of lipid metabolism can provide improvement in body composition, cardiovascular function and physical performance in previously sedentary women. NW compared to the regular walk with the same speed revealed higher energy expenditure.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32236147 PMCID: PMC7112189 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230917
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Flowchart of the study design.
Anthropometric characteristic of the study subjects before (b) and after (a) a 6-week Nordic Walking training.
| Variable | Parameters of respondents (n = 18) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| b | a | Δ | ||
| M ± SD | M ± SD | M ± SD | ||
| BM (kg) | 69.3 ± 9.01 | 68.7 ± 8.66 | 0.62 ± 1.00 | 0.02 |
| LBM (kg) | 45.2 ± 4.79 | 45.0 ± 4.54 | 0.19 ± 0.77 | ns |
| FM (kg) | 24.2 ± 4.83 | 23.7 ± 4.68 | 0.43 ± 0.55 | <0.01 |
| PBF (%) | 34.6 ± 3.14 | 34.3 ± 3.19 | 0.26 ± 0.66 | ns |
| BMI (kg.m-2) | 26.6 ± 2.79 | 26.4 ± 2.70 | 0.28 ± 0.33 | <0.01 |
Values are mean (M) ± standard deviation (SD); Δ—changes in indicator levels resulting from the workout; BM- body mass; LBM—lean body mass; FM—fat mass; PBF—percent of body fat, BMI—body mass index; ns—differences not statistically significant
* the results of the Student’s t-test for dependent samples.
Haemodynamic indices at rest before (b) and after (a) a 6-week Nordic Walking training.
| Variable | Parameters of respondents (n = 18) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| b | a | Δ | ||
| M ± SD | M ± SD | M ± SD | ||
| HRrest (beats.min-1) | 85.9 ± 14.0 | 76.6 ± 12.3 | 9.33 ± 10.5 | <0.01 |
| SBP (mm Hg) | 127.5 ± 10.3 | 116.1 ± 11.5 | 11.4 ± 9.52 | <0.01 |
| DBP (mm Hg) | 80.3 ± 8.13 | 74.4 ± 7.05 | 5.83 ± 6.24 | <0.01 |
Values are mean (M) ± standard deviation (SD); Δ—changes in indicator levels resulting from the workout; HRrest−heart rate at rest; SBP–systolic blood pressure; DBP–diastolic blood pressure
* the results of the Student’s t-test for dependent samples.
Cardiorespiratory indices in a graded walking exercise with (NW) and without poles (W) in the segment at walking speed of 1.75 m.s-1 before (b) and after (a) a 6-week Nordic Walking training.
| Variable | Parameters of respondents (n = 18) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wb | Wa | NWb | NWa | ||
| M ± SD | M ± SD | M ± SD | M ± SD | ||
| VO2∙HR-1 (ml.beats-1) | 8.45 ± 1.38 | 9.82 ± 1.68 | 9.19 ± 1.24 | 10.54 ± 1.73 | <0.01 |
| ∑HR (beats.min-1) | 1459.0 ±155.9 | 1308.9 ± 154.1 | 1544.0 ± 175.9 | 1395.3 ± 170.1 | <0.01 |
| FR (l.min-1) | 27.7 ± 5.64 | 28.3 ± 5.03 | 32.1 ± 4.48 | 31.1 ± 4.65 | 0.03 |
| VE (l.min-1) | 34.3 ± 6.36 | 33.7 ± 5.99 | 41.9 ± 8.87 | 41.7 ± 7.77 | <0.01 |
| TV (l) | 1.27 ± 0.29 | 1.20 ± 0.16 | 1.33 ± 0.23 | 1.36 ± 0.26 | ns |
| VO2 (l.min-1) | 1.18 ± 0.18 | 1.20 ± 0.18 | 1.41 ± 0.21 | 1.42 ± 0.22 | <0.01 |
| VO2 (ml.kg-1.min-1) | 16.8 ± 1.81 | 17.7 ± 2.72 | 20.4 ± 2.28 | 20.82 ± 2.98 | <0.01 |
| RER | 0.88 ± 0.04 | 0.84 ± 0.05 | 0.90 ± 0.06 | 0.85 ± 0.03 | <0.01 |
| EE (cal) | 5.90 ± 0.93 | 5.70 ± 0.87 | 6.93 ± 1.10 | 6.78 ± 1.07 | <0.01 |
Values are mean (M) ± standard deviation (SD); VO2.HR-1—oxygen pulse; ∑HR—the sum of heart rate till the end of the segment with 1.75m.sek-1 walking speed; FR—frequency of respiration; VE—minute ventilation; TV—tidal volume; VO2—oxygen uptake per minute; RER—respiratory exchange ratio; EE—energy expenditure; ns—differences not statistically significant
* a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Comparisons in pairs of average values of indicators using the Tukey’s post-hoc test (The * symbol means important significant differences).
| Variable | Specification | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wb-Wa | Wb–NWb | Wb-NWa | Wa–NWb | Wa–NWa | NWb–NWa | |
| HR (beats.min-1) | * | * | * | * | * | |
| VO2∙HR-1 (ml.beats-1) | * | * | * | |||
| ∑HR (beats.min-1) | * | * | * | |||
| FR (l.min-1) | * | * | ||||
| VE (l.min-1) | * | * | * | * | ||
| VO2 (l.min-1) | * | * | * | * | ||
| VO2 (ml.kg-1.min-1) | * | * | * | * | ||
| RER | * | * | * | |||
| EE (cal) | * | * | * | * | ||
| SBP3ʼ (mm Hg) | * | * | * | * | ||
| DBP3ʼ (mm Hg) | * | * | * | * | ||
| VO2 max(l.min-1) | * | * | * | |||
| VO2 max(ml.kg-1.min-1) | * | * | * | |||
W–regular walking; NW–Nordic walking; b—before training intervention; a—after training intervention; VO2.HR-1—oxygen pulse; ∑HR—the sum of heart rate till the end of the segment with 1.75m.s-1 walking speed; FR—frequency of respiration; VE—minute ventilation; TV—tidal volume; VO2—oxygen uptake per minute; RER—respiratory exchange ratio; EE—energy expenditure; SBP3ʼ—systolic blood pressure in the 3rd minute of restitution; DBP3ʼ—diastolic blood pressure in the 3rd minute of restitution; VO2max–maximum oxygen uptake.
Fig 2HR in segments at walking speed of 1.75 m.s-1 before and after NW training.
Heart rate (HR) of the study subjects (n = 18) in the graded walking exercise with poles (NW) and without poles (W) before (b) and after (a) a series of workouts. Values are presented as mean and 95% confidence intervals.
Haemodynamic indices in the 3rd minute of recovery after graded walking exercise with (NW) and without poles (W) before (b) and after (a) a 6-week Nordic Walking training.
| Variable | Parameters of respondents (n = 18) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wb | Wa | NWb | NWa | ||
| M ± SD | M ± SD | M ± SD | M ± SD | ||
| HR3ʼ (beats.min-1) | 97.9 ± 11.0 | 90.5 ± 9.95 | 101.1 ± 9.64 | 99.0 ± 14.3 | ns |
| HRR% | 85.9 ± 13.9 | 83.5 ± 10.3 | 81.8 ± 14.9 | 77.5 ± 11.9 | ns |
| ΔHRmax-3ʼ (beats.min-1) | 58.1 ± 10.3 | 60.3 ± 11.6 | 58.9 ± 10.7 | 58.8 ± 9.03 | ns |
| SBP3ʼ (mm Hg) | 136.7 ± 11.1 | 120.8 ± 8.95 | 135.6 ± 7.65 | 122.2 ± 9.27 | <0.01 |
| DBP3ʼ (mm Hg) | 85.3 ± 6.52 | 76.4 ± 6.37 | 86.1 ± 6.31 | 77.8 ± 6.91 | <0.01 |
Values are mean (M) ± standard deviation (SD); HR3ʼ—heart rate in the 3rd minute of restitution; HRR%—heart rate recovery index; ΔHRmax-3ʼ—maximal heart rate during the exercise test minus the heart rate in the 3rd minute of restitution; SBP3ʼ—systolic blood pressure in the 3rd minute of restitution, DBP3ʼ—diastolic blood pressure in the 3rd minute of restitution; ns—differences not statistically significant
* a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Fig 3VO2max before and after a 6-week Nordic Walking training.
Predicted values of maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) of the study subjects (n = 18) based on the sub-maximum walking exercises with poles (NW) and without poles (W). Values are presented as mean and 95% confidence intervals.