| Literature DB >> 32236144 |
Emily Gibson1, Natasha Stacey1, Terry C H Sunderland2, Dedi S Adhuri3.
Abstract
Small-scale coastal fisheries contribute directly and indirectly to the food and nutrition security of marine-dependent households. Fishers can apportion part of their catch for household consumption or use the income earned to purchase staples and other desired foods. Fish are an important animal-source food rich in micronutrients essential for cognitive development of children and for adult health, and a valuable addition to rice-based diets. Furthermore, the engagement of women in fisheries value chains and increased control over income may facilitate decision-making which improves nutrition outcomes for women and their children. Despite these contributions, food insecurity remains prevalent in many low and middle income fish-producing countries. This paper reports findings from an exploration of the interplaying factors leading to food and nutrition insecurity in three marine-dependent coastal communities in eastern Indonesia, focusing on the consumption pathway, that is, the contribution of fish to the diets and nutrition of women and children. The research was undertaken as a mixed-methods case study. The study found that over 50% of mother-child pairs failed to meet the minimum recommended dietary diversity, and, while fish was the main animal-source food in diets, the introduction of fish to infant and young child diets was delayed due to fears of allergies and illnesses. Moreover, access to nutrient-dense foods was affected by variable and insufficient income from fisheries-based livelihoods, isolation from markets, and the broader food environment. Given the shift towards 'nutrition-sensitive interventions' to improve the livelihoods and well-being of fisher households, these results highlight the need for analysis of the intra-household sharing of fish within fisher households, culturally-appropriate strategies to improve the quality of family and especially complementary foods, and efforts to increase physical access to nutrient-dense foods.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32236144 PMCID: PMC7112201 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230777
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Summary of field methods and data collection.
| Research activities | Field site | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FS 1 | FS 2 | FS 3 | Labuan Bajo | ||
| Population / households | 1,860 / 477 | 604 / 152 | 242 / 56 | 2,706 / 685 | |
| Eligible households | 186 | 52 | 25 | 263 | |
| Household survey | |||||
| • January 2018 | 36 | 20 | 10 | 66 | |
| • April 2018 | 34 | 15 | 10 | 59 | |
| Interviews | |||||
| • Village leaders and government reps | 5 (3M; 2W) | 3 (2M; 1W) | 2 (1M; 1W) | 6 (2M; 4W) | 16 (8M; 8W) |
| • Community member | 12 (0M; 12W) | 6 (0M; 6W) | 4 (0M; 4W) | 2 (0M; 2W) | 24 (0M; 24W) |
| Focus group discussions | 5 (8M; 29W) | 2 (4M; 10W) | 2 (6M; 5W) | 9 (18M; 44W) | |
FS–field site; M–man; W–woman
a b estimates from village census information and local health volunteers respectively, October 2017
c two households declined to participate again and the other households were absent.
Socio-demographic characteristics and nutritional status of women and children.
| Characteristics | Mean ± | N | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal age, years | 29.7 ± 6.7 | 66 | |
| Highest level of schooling completed | 66 | ||
| Some primary | 32 (48.5) | ||
| Completed primary | 19 (28.8) | ||
| Some or completed secondary; or further education | 15 (22.7) | ||
| Mother has income-generating livelihood activity | 26 (39.4) | ||
| Nutritional status | 63 | ||
| Underweight (BMI < 18.49) | 6 (9.5) | ||
| Normal (BMI ≤ 18.5 < 24.9) | 28 (44.5) | ||
| Overweight (BMI ≤ 25 < 30) | 23 (36.5) | ||
| Obese (BMI ≥ 30) | 6 (9.5) | ||
| Sex | 66 | ||
| Male | 41 (62.1) | ||
| Age (wet / dry season) | 66, 59 | ||
| 6–11 months | 8 (12) | 5 (8.5) | |
| 12–17 months | 14 (21) | 10 (16.9) | |
| 18–23 months | 8 (12) | 7 (11.9) | |
| 24+ months | 36 (55) | 37 (62.7) | |
| Breastfeeding (wet / dry season), by age category | 66 | ||
| 6–11 months | 8 (100) | 4 (80) | |
| 12–17 months | 11 (79) | 8 (80) | |
| 18–23 months | 6 (75) | 4 (57) | |
| 24+ months | 15 (41.7) | 14 (38) | |
| Minimum acceptable feeds (wet / dry season), by age category | 66, 59 | ||
| 6–11 months | 7 (87.5) | 2 (40) | |
| 12–17 months | 4 (28.6) | 5 (50) | |
| 18–23 months | 3 (37.5) | 2 (28.6) | |
| 24+ months | 19 (52.8) | 19 (51.4) | |
| All children | 33 (50) | 28 (47.5) | |
| Stunting, by age category | 56 | ||
| 6–11 months | 3 (37.5) | ||
| 12–17 months | 4 (33.3) | ||
| 18–23 months | 2 (33.3) | ||
| 24+ months | 19 (63.3) | ||
| All children | 28 (50) | ||
| Material Styles of Life scale (wealth) | 0, ± 1 Range -1.21805, 2.24643 | 66 | |
| Lowest wealth | 24 (36.4) | ||
| Middle wealth | 30 (45.5) | ||
| Highest wealth | 12 (18.2) | ||
| Access to improved sanitation | 25 (37.9) | 66 | |
| Dual burden households | 9 (16.98) | 53 | |
a Height and weight of pregnant women was not recorded
b as a proportion of relevant age class
c the minimum acceptable number of feeds per day for a breastfed child aged 6–8 months is 2, for a breastfed child aged 9–23 months is 3, and for a non-breastfed child aged 9–23 months is 4 feeds [46]
d height and weight could not be collected from 10 children
e households had access to improved sanitation if they had a pour/flush to latrine pit or septic tank that was not shared with other households
f households were classed as ‘dual burden’ when the mother has a BMI class of overweight or obese and the child has stunted growth.
Summary of mother and child dietary diversity scores and proportion of individuals and pairs achieving minimum recommended dietary diversity.
| Wet season | Dry season | |||
| Mean; median; range | Proportion (%) achieving threshold | Mean; median; range | Proportion (%) achieving threshold | |
| Mothers | 3.5; 3.0; 1–7 | 21.0 | 3.6; 4.0; 1–7 | 24.0 |
| Children | ||||
| 6–11 months | 1.5; 1.0; 0–3 | 0.0 | 1.4; 1.0; 0–3 | 0.0 |
| 12–17 months | 2.4; 2.5; 0–4 | 7.1 | 3.0; 3.5; 1–4 | 50.0 |
| 18–23 months | 2.8; 3.0; 0–5 | 37.5 | 2.7; 2.0; 1–5 | 28.6 |
| 24+ months | 3.2; 3.0; 1–6 | 33.3 | 3.4; 3.0; 1–6 | 48.6 |
| All children | 2.8; 3.0; 0–6 | 24.2 | 3.1; 3.0; 0–6 | 42.2 |
| Proportion (%) of pairs | ||||
| Wet season | Dry season | |||
| Both mother or child met threshold | 14 | 20 | ||
| Only child met threshold | 11 | 24 | ||
| Only mother met threshold | 8 | 3 | ||
| Neither mother or child met threshold | 68 | 53 | ||
The minimum recommended dietary diversity (“the threshold”) for children is 4 of 7 food groups, and for women of reproductive age is 5 of 10 food groups.
Fig 1Proportion of mothers consuming different food groups during the wet and dry seasons.
Fig 1 shows the proportion of mothers who reported consuming foods within different food groups in the preceding 24-hour period. Consumption of fish is reported within the food group ‘meat, poultry and fish’ and as in individual food; consumption of sweet and savoury snack foods are not included in the dietary diversity indicator score, but are included to show dietary pattern. * indicates a statistically significant difference in seasonal consumption.
Fig 2Proportion of children consuming different food groups during the wet and dry seasons.
Panels A and B show the proportion of children, by age class, who were reported to have consumed foods within different food groups in the preceding 24 hour period in the wet and dry seasons respectively. Consumption of fish is reported within the food group ‘flesh foods’ and as an individual food; consumption of sweet and savoury snack foods are not included in the dietary diversity indicator score, but are included to show dietary pattern. * indicates a statistically significant difference in seasonal consumption for ‘all children’.
Fig 3Proportion of mother-child pairs consuming nutrient-dense food groups in the wet and dry seasons.
Fig 3 shows the proportion of mother-child pairs who consumed foods from different food groups during the wet and dry season recall periods. While the diets of mother-child pairs are similar, mothers reported consuming fish and ‘fruits and vegetables’ more often than their child.
Association between a child having adequate dietary diversity and explanatory factors.
| Factors | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds ratio | 95% Cl | Odds ratio | 95% CI | |||
| Child’s sex (F/M) | 0.5 | 0.2–1.3 | ||||
| Child age (months) | 1.0 | 1.0–1.1 | 0.034 | 1.1 | 1.0–1.1 | 0.032 |
| Child’s consumption of fish (Y/N) | 5.0 | 1.7–15.1 | 0.005 | |||
| Child breastfeeding (Y/N) | 0.7 | 0.3–1.5 | ||||
| Child stunted (Y/N) | 2.6 | 0.7–9.3 | ||||
| Maternal age (years) | 1.0 | 1.0–1.1 | ||||
| Mother’s dietary diversity achieved | 9.9 | 3.8–25.9 | < 0.001 | 20.0 | 6.0–66.1 | < 0.001 |
| Mother with completed primary or higher education | 1.7 | 0.7–4.1 | ||||
| Mother with own livelihood activity | 1.7 | 0.7–4.1 | ||||
| Not a dual burden household | 0.3 | 0.1–0.6 | 0.009 | 0.4 | 0.1–1.3 | 0.106 |
| Access to improved sanitation | 1.0 | 0.4–2.3 | ||||
| Season | 2.3 | 1.2–4.6 | 0.018 | 2.9 | 1.1–7.9 | 0.035 |
CI: Confidence Interval; p value only shown when significant
* p < 0.05
** p < 0.01 and
*** p < 0.001.