| Literature DB >> 32235632 |
Hyeon-Cheol Kim1, Zong-Yi Zhu2.
Abstract
Having friendships and interpersonal social connections is a normal and expected necessity of life that enhances an individual's well-being. Digital platforms, such as mobile social network applications (MSNA), present a means for people with disabilities to integrate in society. This study combines intrinsic benefits (such as enjoyment experience and information) and extrinsic benefits (such as social networking) to explore the impact of these benefits on online friendships, and the influence of these online friendships on the perceived social connectedness and well-being of people with physical disabilities. The partial least squares methodology was used to conduct statistical analysis on survey data; the outputs were obtained through convergent analysis, discriminant analysis, and bootstrapping. The results showed that enjoyment experience and social network benefits significantly influence online friendships, which influence perceived social connectedness and well-being. In addition, the perceived social exclusion has a significant moderation effect. Our findings are expected to help local disability service organizations develop effective digital disability inclusion strategies to combat widespread social exclusion among people with disabilities.Entities:
Keywords: enjoyment experience; online friendships; perceived social connectedness; social network; well-being
Year: 2020 PMID: 32235632 PMCID: PMC7177844 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17072333
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Research model.
Figure 2Mobile social network application by a disability service organization.
Measurement items and factor loading.
| Construct | Measurement | Factor Loading | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enjoyment Experience Benefit (EEB) | MSNA is fun. | 0.882 | Koufaris [ |
| MSNA is exciting. | 0.883 | ||
| MSNA is enjoyable. | 0.901 | ||
| MSNA is interesting. | 0.921 | ||
| Information Benefit (IB) | MSNA is a good source of information. | 0.877 | Ducoffe [ |
| MSNA supplies relevant information. | 0.897 | ||
| MSNA provides timely information. | 0.910 | ||
| Social Network Benefit (SNB) | I can contact friends on MSNA. | 0.839 | Arnold and Reynold [ |
| I can share experiences with friends on MSNA. | 0.891 | ||
| I can develop friendships with others on MSNA. | 0.821 | ||
| I can extend personal relationships on MSNA | 0.840 | ||
| Online Friendship (OF) | The MSNA provider is trustworthy. | 0.895 | Roberts, Varki, and Brodie [ |
| I am happy with the MSNA provider’s performance | 0.908 | ||
| I continue to deal with the MSNA provider because I genuinely enjoy my relationship with them. | 0.912 | ||
| Perceived Social Connectedness (PSC) | I feel I am connected to other users on MSNA. | 0.847 | Chen [ |
| I feel like I fit in on MSNA. | 0.888 | ||
| I have made connections with other people on MSNA. | 0.896 | ||
| I feel comfortable communicating with other people on MSNA. | 0.805 | ||
| Well-being (WB) | The conditions of my life are excellent. | 0.880 | Pavot and Diener [ |
| I am satisfied with my life. | 0.865 | ||
| So far, I have achieved the important things I want in life. | 0.901 |
Reliability and inter-construct correlations.
| Construct | Cronbach’s Alpha | CR | AVE | WB | EEB | IB | OF | PSC | SNB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WB | 0.858 | 0.913 | 0.778 | 0.882 | |||||
| EEB | 0.905 | 0.934 | 0.779 | 0.775 | 0.882 | ||||
| IB | 0.946 | 0.957 | 0.786 | 0.778 | 0.890 | 0.887 | |||
| OF | 0.889 | 0.931 | 0.819 | 0.855 | 0.761 | 0.751 | 0.905 | ||
| PSC | 0.882 | 0.919 | 0.740 | 0.882 | 0.774 | 0.771 | 0.878 | 0.860 | |
| SNB | 0.870 | 0.911 | 0.719 | 0.788 | 0.776 | 0.778 | 0.773 | 0.761 | 0.848 |
CR: composite reliability; AVE: average variance extracted.
Results of hypothesis pathway.
| Hypothesis | Estimate (Standard) | CR | Support | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | 0.300 | 2.310 | 0.02 | Yes |
| H2 | 0.147 | 1.108 | 0.268 | No |
| H3 | 0.423 | 4.380 | *** | Yes |
| H4 | 0.876 | 18.427 | *** | Yes |
| H5 | 0.356 | 3.958 | *** | Yes |
| H6 | 0.569 | 6.319 | *** | Yes |
Figure 3Results of hypothesis (N = 104). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4Results of mediation effect. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.