| Literature DB >> 32235381 |
Bogdan Pascu1, Adina Negrea1, Mihaela Ciopec1, Corneliu Mircea Davidescu1, Petru Negrea1, Vasile Gherman1, Narcis Duteanu1.
Abstract
The main objective of the present paper is the green synthesis of colloidal silver by ultrasonication starting from silver nitrate and using soluble starch as the reducing agent. Soluble starch has been used during synthesis because it is a cheap and environmentally friendly reactive. Silver colloid has been characterized by physicochemical methods: UV-VIS spectroscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy. This colloidal material was prepared in order to prove and establish its toxicity on heterotrophic bacteria. Toxicity tests were carried out using test cultures with and without silver colloid with different concentrations. This way was possible to establish the minimum silver concentration that presents a toxic effect against used bacteria. Quantitative evaluation of bacterial growth was performed by using the Most Probable Number method. By counting the bacterial colony number, the antibacterial effect was determined for colloidal silver deposited onto the cotton gauze by adsorption. During the present study, we optimized the adsorption specific parameters: solid:liquid ratio, temperature, contact time, colloidal silver concentration. By thermodynamic, equilibrium and kinetic studies, the adsorptive process mechanism was established.Entities:
Keywords: adsorption; antibacterial effect; band aid; colloidal silver; soluble starch; ultrasonic
Year: 2020 PMID: 32235381 PMCID: PMC7177337 DOI: 10.3390/ma13071578
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Silver colloidal applications.
Figure 2UV–VIS absorption spectra for different precursor:reducing agent: water ratios.
Figure 3UV–VIS absorption spectra for different ultrasound times.
Figure 4UV–VIS absorption spectra for different ultrasound bath temperatures.
Figure 5SEM image (a) and Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectra (b) for synthetized colloidal silver.
Figure 6Bacterial inhibition zone image and total colony units. (a)—Control; (b) —50 mg Ag colloidal/L; (c)—CFU vs colloidal silver concentration.
Figure 7Influence of solid (S):liquid (L) ratio on adsorption process efficiency.
Figure 8Influence of contact time and temperature on adsorption capacity.
Figure 9Kinetic studies. (a) pseudo-first-order; (b) pseudo-second-order.
Kinetic parameters for the adsorption of colloidal silver onto material/textile/cotton.
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 298 | 2.16 | 0.246 | 1.06 | 0.9839 |
| 308 | 2.38 | 0.322 | 1.81 | 0.8906 |
| 318 | 2.55 | 0.430 | 2.03 | 0.9133 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 298 | 2.16 | 13.52 | 2.58 | 0.9974 |
| 308 | 2.38 | 17.83 | 3.03 | 0.9803 |
| 318 | 2.55 | 21.13 | 3.15 | 0.9831 |
Figure 10ln K = f (1/T).
Thermodynamic parameters for adsorption of silver onto cotton.
| Δ | Δ | Δ | R2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.7 | 19.24 | 298 K | 308 K | 318 K | 0.9999 |
| −11.8 | −20.36 | −39.68 | |||
Figure 11ln k = f (1/T).
Figure 12Experimental data modeled with adsorption isotherms.
Kinetic parameters obtained for the used adsorption isotherms.
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.35 | 0.239 | 2.30 | 0.95616 |
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
| 0.725 | 0.29 | 0.93262 | |
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.268 | 2.74 | 0.3 | 0.95548 |
Figure 13Characterization of the cotton before and after colloidal silver adsorption. (a) SEM image before adsorption; (b) EDX spectra before adsorption; (c) SEM image after adsorption; (d) EDX spectra after adsorption.
Figure 15Antimicrobial test. (a) Control (b) Test.