Literature DB >> 32234803

Transition to quantitative faecal immunochemical testing from guaiac faecal occult blood testing in a fully rolled-out population-based national bowel screening programme.

Gavin Clark1, Judith A Strachan2, Frank A Carey3, Thomas Godfrey1, Audrey Irvine4, Alisson McPherson2, Jess Brand5, Annie S Anderson6, Callum G Fraser7, Robert Jc Steele8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) are replacing guaiac faecal occult blood tests (FOBT) in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Data from the first year of FIT screening were compared with those from FOBT screening and assumptions based on a pilot evaluation of FIT.
DESIGN: Data on uptake, positivity, positive predictive value (PPV) for CRC and higher-risk adenoma from participants in the first year of the FIT-based Scottish Bowel Screening Programme (n=919 665), with a threshold of 80 µg Hb/g faeces, were compared with those from the penultimate year of the FOBT-based programme (n=862 165) and those from the FIT evaluation (n=66 225).
RESULTS: Overall, uptake of FIT was 63.9% compared with 56.4% for FOBT. Positivity was 3.1% and 2.2% with FIT and FOBT; increases were seen in both sexes, and across age range and deprivation. More CRC and adenomas were detected by FIT, but the PPV for CRC was less (5.2% with FIT and 6.4% with FOBT). However, for higher-risk adenoma, PPV was greater with FIT (24.3% with FIT and 19.3% with FOBT). In the previous FIT evaluation, uptake was 58.5% with FIT compared with 54.0% with FOBT; positivity was 2.5% with FIT and 2.0% with FOBT.
CONCLUSION: Transition to FIT from FOBT produced higher uptake and positivity with lower PPV for CRC and higher PPV for adenoma. The FIT pilot evaluation underestimated uptake and positivity. Introducing FIT at the same threshold as the evaluation caused a 67.2% increase in colonoscopy demand instead of a predicted 10%. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adenoma; colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32234803     DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  11 in total

1.  Change in colorectal cancer (CRC) testing rates associated with the introduction of the first organized screening program in canton Uri, Switzerland: Evidence from insurance claims data analyses from 2010 to 2018.

Authors:  Sarah Bissig; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; Rémi Schneider; Kali Tal; Kevin Selby; Cinzia Del Giovane; Jean-Luc Bulliard; Oliver Senn; Cyril Ducros; Christian P R Schmid; Urs Marbet; Reto Auer
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-06-10

2.  Priority stratification for colonoscopy based on two-sample faecal immunochemical test screening: results from a cross-sectional study at an endoscopy clinic in Japan.

Authors:  Osamu Toyoshima; Yutaka Yamaji; Toshihiro Nishizawa; Shuntaro Yoshida; Tomoharu Yamada; Ken Kurokawa; Miho Obata; Ryo Kondo; Masahito Toba; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  The use of the faecal immunochemical test during the COVID-19 pandemic to triage urgent colorectal cancer referrals.

Authors:  Faddy Kamel; Saadia Zulfiqar; WIlliam Penfold; Stephanie Weatherell; Rana Madani; Pasha Nisar; Philip Bearn
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.917

4.  The use of faecal haemoglobin in deciding which patients presenting to primary care require further investigation (and how quickly) - the FIT approach.

Authors:  Judith A Strachan; Craig Mowat
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2021-02-28

5.  Recognising Colorectal Cancer in Primary Care.

Authors:  Natalia Calanzani; Aina Chang; Marije Van Melle; Merel M Pannebakker; Garth Funston; Fiona M Walter
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  Faecal haemoglobin concentrations in women and men diagnosed with colorectal cancer in a national screening programme.

Authors:  Gavin Rc Clark; Jayne Digby; Callum G Fraser; Judith A Strachan; Robert Jc Steele
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 2.136

7.  What can We Learn From High-Performing Screening Programs to Increase Bowel Cancer Screening Participation in Australia?

Authors:  Louisa Flander; Evelien Dekker; Berit Andersen; Mette Bach Larsen; Robert J Steele; Nea Malila; Tytti Sarkeala; Manon van der Vlugt; Clasine de Klerk; Bart Knottnerus; Lucinda Bertels; Anke Woudstra; Manon C W Spaander; Mirjam Fransen; Sirpa Heinavaara; Mary Dillon; Driss Ait Ouakrim; Mark Jenkins
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.339

8.  The role of microvesicles as biomarkers in the screening of colorectal neoplasm.

Authors:  Mohammad M R Eddama; Rijan Gurung; Konstantinos Fragkos; Paula Lorgelly; Richard Cohen; Marilena Loizidou; Lucie Clapp
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 4.711

9.  COVID-19: Colorectal cancer endoscopic surveillance in IBD.

Authors:  Shahida Din; Daniel R Gaya; Ian D R Arnott
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-07

10.  Evaluation of a panel of tumor-specific differentially-methylated DNA regions in IRF4, IKZF1 and BCAT1 for blood-based detection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Graeme P Young; Erin L Symonds; Hans Jørgen Nielsen; Linnea Ferm; Ib J Christensen; Evelien Dekker; Manon van der Vlugt; Rosalie C Mallant-Hent; Nicky Boulter; Betty Yu; Michelle Chan; Gregor Tevz; Lawrence C LaPointe; Susanne K Pedersen
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 6.551

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.