Literature DB >> 32234428

Neural substrates of bilingual processing in a logographic writing system: An fMRI study in Chinese Cantonese-Mandarin bilinguals.

Jingwen Ma1, Yujia Wu1, Tao Sun1, Lei Cai1, Xiaoxuan Fan1, Xiuhong Li2.   

Abstract

Logographic-logographic bilingualism is lacking in bilingual researches. Cantonese and Mandarin are two Chinese languages that belong to the logographic writing system and share the same set of Chinese characters. Cantonese-Mandarin bilinguals employ logographic-logographic bilingualism, and thus provide a unique population for bilingual studies. In Cantonese-Mandarin bilinguals, it remains unclear whether the second language (L2) phonological processing conforms to the assimilation or accommodation hypothesis and whether the brain mechanisms underlying Cantonese and Mandarin phonological processing are similar. Differential brain mechanisms of Mandarin as first language (L1) and L2 also needs to be clarified. Task-modality functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to explore these questions in Cantonese-Mandarin bilinguals and native Mandarin speakers. Univariate analysis, activation similarity analysis, brain-behavioral analysis and psychophysiological interaction (PPI) analysis were conducted. Novel evidence for accommodation was observed in the L2 processing of Cantonese-Mandarin bilinguals, indicating that small language distance leads to the accommodation of L2 processing, which is absolutely distinct to alphabetic bilingualism. We speculated that the role of language distance in the balance between assimilation and accommodation may be regulated by L1. Notably, we found Cantonese processing relied more on orthography-to-phonology mapping, phonological processing, language control and inhibition while Mandarin relied more on memory extraction. And Mandarin processing as L1 and L2 in our study are highly similar, suggesting the stability of brain regions processing Mandarin.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Accommodation hypothesis; Bilingual; Logographic writing system; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32234428     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  3 in total

1.  The Differences in Structure and Function of the Cerebellum Between Cantonese-Mandarin Bilinguals and Mandarin Monolinguals: a Multi-model MRI Study.

Authors:  Yuying Jin; Xiaoxuan Fan; Xiaoyu Xu; Ning Pan; Jin Jing; Xiaojing Song; Si Tan; Xuning Guo; Xiuhong Li
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study on the White Matter Structures Related to the Phonology in Cantonese-Mandarin Bilinguals.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Xu; Yuying Jin; Ning Pan; Muqing Cao; Jin Jing; Jingwen Ma; Xiaoxuan Fan; Si Tan; Xiaojing Song; Xiuhong Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.473

3.  The Differences in the Whole-Brain Functional Network between Cantonese-Mandarin Bilinguals and Mandarin Monolinguals.

Authors:  Xiaoxuan Fan; Yujia Wu; Lei Cai; Jingwen Ma; Ning Pan; Xiaoyu Xu; Tao Sun; Jin Jing; Xiuhong Li
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-03-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.