Literature DB >> 3223354

Adhesion patterns and cytoskeleton of rabbit osteoclasts on bone slices and glass.

K Turksen1, J Kanehisa, M Opas, J N Heersche, J E Aubin.   

Abstract

The ability of osteoclasts (OC) to migrate and resorb bone is thought to be dependent on cytoskeletal function and adhesion. Therefore, we investigated the cytoskeleton and the adhesion patterns of rabbit OC on glass and on devitalized bone slices, using specific antibodies to cytoskeletal elements and fluorescence and interference reflection microscopy. Microtubules (MT) were similar in OC on both substrata, and appeared in a pattern typical of that described for many cells. Multiple centriolar complexes were observed in most OC, either as one large aggregate in the center of the cell or dispersed singly or in small aggregates close to individual nuclei. Staining of microfilaments (MF) was similar on both substrata and appeared primarily as an F-actin network. MF distribution was different in OC associated with resorption lacunae with intense staining over those regions. In the OC on glass, high F-actin staining was detectable at the periphery in dots and rosette-like structures, which also stained for vinculin. The adhesion patterns indicated that OC on glass do not make large focal contacts, but appear to make a few tiny focal contacts that are not associated with the rosette-like structures. Most of the undersurface of the OC appeared either to be involved in close contacts or to be separated by distances of greater than 100 nm from the substratum. These studies indicate that the MF distribution and the adhesion patterns of rabbit OC are typical of motile cells, that the distribution of the cytoskeleton of rabbit OC on glass and on bone slices is similar, and that MF may be involved in the morphological changes associated with resorption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3223354     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650030405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  19 in total

1.  Substrate influences rat osteoclast morphology and expression of potassium conductances.

Authors:  S A Arkett; S J Dixon; S M Sims
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Vitronectin receptor: tissue specific expression or adaptation to culture?

Authors:  M Horton
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  In vitro bone resorption by isolated multinucleated giant cells from giant cell tumour of bone: light and electron microscopic study.

Authors:  J Kanehisa; T Izumo; M Takeuchi; T Yamanaka; T Fujii; H Takeuchi
Journal:  Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol       Date:  1991

4.  Regulated proteolysis of nonmuscle myosin IIA stimulates osteoclast fusion.

Authors:  Brooke K McMichael; Robert B Wysolmerski; Beth S Lee
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Pitfalls in pit measurement.

Authors:  A Boyde; S J Jones
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Differential distribution of posttranslationally modified microtubules in osteoclasts.

Authors:  Toshitaka Akisaka; Hisaho Yoshida; Toshiya Takigawa
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 2.479

7.  The effect of fluoride on the patterns of adherence of osteoclasts cultured on and resorbing dentine: a 3-D assessment of vinculin-labelled cells using confocal optical microscopy.

Authors:  M L Taylor; A Boyde; S J Jones
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1989

8.  The cytoskeletal framework of chick osteoclasts in resin-less sections.

Authors:  T Kato; T Akisaka
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  A comparison of the effects of inhibitors of carbonic anhydrase on osteoclastic bone resorption and purified carbonic anhydrase isozyme II.

Authors:  T J Hall; W Higgins; C Tardif; T J Chambers
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Bone is not essential for osteoclast activation.

Authors:  Karen Fuller; Jade L Ross; Kinga A Szewczyk; Raymond Moss; Tim J Chambers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.