Literature DB >> 32232788

In vivo biochemical investigation of spermatogenic status: 1H-MR spectroscopy of testes with nonobstructive azoospermia.

Alexandra Ntorkou1, Athina C Tsili2, Loukas Astrakas3, Anna Goussia4, Eleni Panopoulou4, Nikolaos Sofikitis5, Maria I Argyropoulou2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the biochemical milieu in testes with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) by using proton MR spectroscopy (1H-MRS) in detecting differences in testicular metabolites between histological stages of NOA and in assessing the possible presence of spermatozoa before microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE).
METHODS: Forty-nine NOA men and fifty age-matched controls were included in this prospective study. A single-voxel point-resolved spectroscopy sequence with TR/TE (2000/25 ms) was used. NOA testes were classified using the higher Johnsen score (hJS) (group 1, hJS ≥ 8; and group 2, hJS < 8). Nonparametric statistical tests were used to assess differences in normalized metabolite concentrations, defined as ratios of the metabolite concentrations versus creatine concentration between (a) NOA and controls, (b) NOA groups, and (c) NOA with positive and negative sperm retrieval.
RESULTS: Normalized concentrations of total choline (median 0.396 vs 1.09 mmol/kg, p = 0.002), myo-inositol (median 1.985 vs 3.19 mmol/kg, p = 0.002), and total lipids and macromolecules (TLM) resonating at 0.9 ppm (median 0.962 vs 2.43 mmol/kg, p = 0.024), 1.3 ppm (median 4.88 vs 10.7 mmol/kg, p = 0.043), and 2.0 ppm (median 2.33 vs 5.96 mmol/kg, p = 0.007) were reduced in NOA testes compared with controls. Decreased concentrations of TLM 2.0 (median 3.755 vs 0.436 mmol/kg, p = 0.043) were found in group 2 compared with group 1. Increased normalized concentrations of glutamate were observed in NOA testes with failed sperm retrieval (median 0.321 vs 0.000 mmol/kg, p = 0.028).
CONCLUSIONS: 1H-MRS provides metabolic information about the testis in NOA patients and assesses spermatogenic status before mTESE. KEY POINTS: • NOA testes differed from age-matched controls, in terms of reduced normalized concentrations of tChol, mI, and lipids. • TLM 2.0 peaks were found useful in the identification of NOA testes with the presence of foci of advanced spermatogenesis up to the haploid gamete stage. • Glu proved a reliable metabolic signature of spermatogenesis in NOA population by assessing the possible presence of sperm after mTESE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Azoospermia; Choline; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Testis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32232788     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06767-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  35 in total

1.  Diffusion-Weighted and Magnetization Transfer Imaging in Testicular Spermatogenic Function Evaluation: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Huanjun Wang; Jian Guan; Jinhua Lin; Zhongwei Zhang; Shurong Li; Yan Guo; Huasong Cai
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: prediction, outcome, and complications.

Authors:  Akira Tsujimura
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.369

3.  Androgen decline in patients with nonobstructive azoospemia after microdissection testicular sperm extraction.

Authors:  Shingo Takada; Akira Tsujimura; Tomohiro Ueda; Yasuhiro Matsuoka; Tetsuya Takao; Yasushi Miyagawa; Minoru Koga; Masami Takeyama; Yoshio Okamoto; Kiyomi Matsumiya; Hideki Fujioka; Norio Nonomura; Akihiko Okuyama
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Prospective evaluation of scrotal ultrasound and intratesticular perfusion by color-coded duplex sonography (CCDS) in TESE patients with azoospermia.

Authors:  Bora Altinkilic; Adrian Pilatz; Thorsten Diemer; Julia Wolf; Martin Bergmann; Sarah Schönbrunn; Uwe Ligges; Hans-Christian Schuppe; Wolfgang Weidner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Usefulness of Testicular Volume, Apparent Diffusion Coefficient, and Normalized Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in the MRI Evaluation of Infertile Men With Azoospermia.

Authors:  Byoung Hee Han; Sung Bin Park; Ju Tae Seo; Yi Kyeong Chun
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Diffusion tensor imaging parameters in testes with nonobstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Athina C Tsili; Alexandra Ntorkou; Anna Goussia; Loukas Astrakas; Eleni Panopoulou; Nikolaos Sofikitis; Maria I Argyropoulou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Structural and functional changes to the testis after conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction.

Authors:  Ranjith Ramasamy; Neda Yagan; Peter N Schlegel
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  3D proton MR spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer using a standard spine coil at 1.5 T in clinical routine: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Matthias P Lichy; Jörg Pintaske; Raimund Kottke; Jürgen Machann; Aristotelis Anastasiadis; Stefan Roell; Jörg Hennenlotter; Till Diergarten; Fritz Schick; Arnulf Stenzl; Claus D Claussen; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-12-31       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Ultrasonographic caput epididymis diameter is reduced in non-obstructive azoospermia compared with normozoospermia but is not predictive for successful sperm retrieval after TESE.

Authors:  A Pezzella; A Barbonetti; S D'Andrea; S Necozione; A Micillo; A Di Gregorio; F Francavilla; S Francavilla
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 10.  Which is the best sperm retrieval technique for non-obstructive azoospermia? A systematic review.

Authors:  P Donoso; H Tournaye; P Devroey
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 15.610

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Predictors of testicular sperm retrieval in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: a review.

Authors:  Lin Qi; Ya P Liu; Nan N Zhang; Ying C Su
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 2.  When to ask for an MRI of the scrotum.

Authors:  Athina C Tsili; Maria I Argyropoulou; Miriam Dolciami; Giada Ercolani; Carlo Catalano; Lucia Manganaro
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.842

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.