Literature DB >> 32232706

Analysis of Surgical Trends for Axillary Lymph Node Management in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Using the NSQIP Database: Are We Following National Guidelines?

Bryan J Pyfer1, Michael Jonczyk2, Jolie Jean3, Roger A Graham2, Lilian Chen2, Abhishek Chatterjee2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), multiple national cancer organizations recommend that sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) be offered when treated with mastectomy, but not when treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS). This study analyzes national surgical trends of SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in DCIS patients undergoing breast surgery with the aim to quantify deviations from national guidelines.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database from 2005 to 2017 identified patients with DCIS. Patients were categorized by their primary method of breast surgery, i.e. mastectomy or BCS, then further categorized by their axillary lymph node (ALN) management, i.e. no intervention, SLNB, or ALND. Data analysis was conducted via linear regression and a non-parametric Mann-Kendall test to assess a temporal trend and Sen's slope.
RESULTS: Overall, 43,448 patients with DCIS met the inclusion criteria: 20,504 underwent mastectomy and 22,944 underwent BCS. Analysis of DCIS patients from 2005 to 2017 revealed that ALND decreased and SLNB increased in every subgroup, regardless of surgical treatment modality. Evaluation in the mastectomy group increased overall: mastectomy alone increased from 57.1 to 65.8% (p < 0.01) and mastectomy with immediate reconstruction increased from 58.5 to 72.1% (p < 0.01). Increases also occurred in the total BCS population: partial mastectomy increased from 14.0 to 21.1% and oncoplastic surgery increased from 10.5 to 23.0% (both p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite national guideline recommendations for the management of ALN surgery in DCIS patients, approximately 20-30% of cases continue to not follow these guidelines. This warrants further education for surgeons and patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32232706     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08374-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  5 in total

1.  Influence of rurality on lymph node assessment among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ and treated with mastectomy, SEER 2000-2015.

Authors:  Danielle Riley; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Ingrid M Lizarraga; Mary Charlton; Brian J Smith; Charles F Lynch
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Nanomedicine-Based Delivery Strategies for Breast Cancer Treatment and Management.

Authors:  Priti Tagde; Agnieszka Najda; Kalpana Nagpal; Giriraj T Kulkarni; Muddaser Shah; Obaid Ullah; Sebastian Balant; Md Habibur Rahman
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Surgical Predictive Model for Breast Cancer Patients Assessing Acute Postoperative Complications: The Breast Cancer Surgery Risk Calculator.

Authors:  Michael M Jonczyk; Carla Suzanne Fisher; Russell Babbitt; Jessica K Paulus; Karen M Freund; Brian Czerniecki; Julie A Margenthaler; Albert Losken; Abhishek Chatterjee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.339

4.  National Variations in the Work-Up, Investigation, and Surgical Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast across Canadian Surgeons.

Authors:  Ryerson Seguin; Lashan Peiris
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  De-escalating axillary surgery in early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Eliza H Hersh; Tari A King
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.254

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.