Literature DB >> 32232688

Diagnosing multiple system atrophy at the prodromal stage.

Chenjie Xia1, Ronald B Postuma2.   

Abstract

Identifying individuals at the earliest disease stage becomes crucial as we aim to develop disease-modifying treatments for neurodegenerative disorders. Prodromal diagnostic criteria were recently developed for Parkinson's disease (PD) and are forthcoming for dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). The latest 2008 version of diagnostic criteria for multiple system atrophy (MSA) have improved diagnostic accuracy in early disease stages compared to previous criteria, but we do not yet have formal criteria for prodromal MSA. Building on similar approaches as for PD and DLB, we can identify features on history-taking, clinical examination, and ancillary clinical testing that can predict the likelihood of an individual developing MSA, while also distinguishing it from PD and DLB. The main clinical hallmarks of MSA are REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) and autonomic dysfunction (particularly orthostatic hypotension and urogenital symptoms), and may be the primary means by which patients with potential prodromal MSA are identified. Preserved olfaction, absence of significant cognitive deficits, urinary retention, and respiratory symptoms such as stridor and respiratory insufficiency can be clinical features that help distinguish MSA from PD and DLB. Finally, ancillary test results including neuroimaging as well as serological and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers may lend further weight to quantifying the likelihood of phenoconversion into MSA. For prodromal criteria, the primary challenges are MSA's lower prevalence, shorter lead time to diagnosis, and strong overlap with other synucleinopathies. Future prodromal criteria may need to first embed the diagnosis into a general umbrella of prodromal alpha-synucleinopathies, followed by identification of features that suggest prodromal MSA as the specific cause.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alpha-synucleinopathies; Multiple system atrophy; Prodromal diagnostic criteria development; Pure autonomic failure

Year:  2020        PMID: 32232688     DOI: 10.1007/s10286-020-00682-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Auton Res        ISSN: 0959-9851            Impact factor:   4.435


  5 in total

Review 1.  A historical review of multiple system atrophy with a critical appraisal of cellular and animal models.

Authors:  David J Marmion; Wouter Peelaerts; Jeffrey H Kordower
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  Odor identification predicts the transition of patients with isolated RBD: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Miyamoto; Masayuki Miyamoto
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 5.430

3.  Improving the Accuracy of Diagnosis for Multiple-System Atrophy Using Deep Learning-Based Method.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Kanatani; Yoko Sato; Shota Nemoto; Manabu Ichikawa; Osamu Onodera
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-22

Review 4.  Current Management and Emerging Therapies in Multiple System Atrophy.

Authors:  Matthew R Burns; Nikolaus R McFarland
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 6.088

Review 5.  Heterogeneity of Multiple System Atrophy: An Update.

Authors:  Kurt A Jellinger
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-03-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.