Literature DB >> 32232550

Comparison between ultrasonography and X-ray as evaluation methods of central venous catheter positioning and their complications in pediatrics.

L Oliveira1, L Pilz2, C M Tognolo3, C Bischoff3, K A Becker3, G G Oliveira3, P J F Neves2, C G Fachin3, M A Agulham3, A I B S Dias3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the capacity of ultrasonography as a diagnostic method to confirm the proper positioning of central venous catheter (CVC) when compared to the current gold standard, chest radiography (CR).
METHODS: A prospective study was performed including children from 0 to 14 incomplete years, who underwent CVC placement between March and May 2018 at a teaching hospital in Brazil. A four-chamber view of the heart was performed with ultrasound during a rapid injection of saline solution to identify hyperechoic images and confirm the central position of the catheter. After that, a CR was performed. The diagnostic quality of ultrasound was evaluated based on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values.
RESULTS: A total of 21 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 3.95 ± 4.01 years. The preferred puncture site was the right internal jugular vein (71.4%). Ultrasound accuracy to detect CVC positioning was 81%. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were 33%, 100%, 100% and 79%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound is a reliable method for detection of CVC positioning. Even so, with the four-chamber cardiac view, this method is unable to identify catheters inside heart chambers, therefore, needing to confirm the positioning with CR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central venous catheter; Children; Pediatric surgery; Pediatrics; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32232550     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-020-04642-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  12 in total

1.  Ultrasonic examination: an alternative to chest radiography after central venous catheter insertion?

Authors:  E Maury; J Guglielminotti; M Alzieu; B Guidet; G Offenstadt
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 2.  Complications of central venous catheters: internal jugular versus subclavian access--a systematic review.

Authors:  Sibylle Ruesch; Bernhard Walder; Martin R Tramèr
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Central venous catheter tip position: a continuing controversy.

Authors:  Thomas M Vesely
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 4.  Preventing complications of central venous catheterization.

Authors:  David C McGee; Michael K Gould
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The real ultrasound revolution.

Authors:  Richard K Baumgarten
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 6.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Central Venous Catheter Confirmation by Bedside Ultrasound Versus Chest Radiography in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Enyo A Ablordeppey; Anne M Drewry; Alexander B Beyer; Daniel L Theodoro; Susan A Fowler; Brian M Fuller; Christopher R Carpenter
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 7.  Late cardiac tamponade in adults secondary to tip position in the right atrium: an urban legend? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Mauro Pittiruti; Massimo Lamperti
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Anatomical variations in the internal jugular veins of cancer patients affecting central venous access. Anatomical variation of the internal jugular vein.

Authors:  T Benter; U K Teichgräber; L Klühs; S Papadopoulos; C H Köhne; R Felix; B Dörken
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.548

9.  Routine X-ray control of upper central venous lines: Is it necessary?

Authors:  O Molgaard; M S Nielsen; B B Handberg; J M Jensen; J Kjaergaard; N Juul
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.105

10.  Mechanical complications and malpositions of central venous cannulations by experienced operators. A prospective study of 1794 catheterizations in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Wolfram Schummer; Claudia Schummer; Norman Rose; Wolf-Dirk Niesen; Samir G Sakka
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.