Molly M Daughety1, Jevgenia Zilberman-Rudenko2, Joseph J Shatzel3, Owen J T McCarty4, Vikram Raghunathan5, Thomas G DeLoughery6. 1. Fellow, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. 2. Medical Student, Oregon Health and Science University. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology. 4. Professor and Chair, Department of Biomedical Engineering. 5. Fellow, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology. 6. Professor, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Mechanical heart valves (MHVs) pose significant thrombogenic risks to pregnant women and their fetuses, yet the choice of anticoagulation in this clinical setting remains unclear. Various therapeutic strategies carry distinct risk profiles that must be considered when making the decision about optimal anticoagulation. OBJECTIVE: We sought to review existing data and offer recommendations for the anticoagulation of pregnant women with MHVs, as well as management of anticoagulation in the peripartum period. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We performed a literature review of studies examining outcomes in pregnant women receiving systemic anticoagulation for mechanical valves, and also reviewed data on the safety profiles of various anticoagulant strategies in the setting of pregnancy. RESULTS: Warfarin has been shown to increase rates of embryopathy and fetal demise, although it has traditionally been the favored anticoagulant in this setting. Low-molecular-weight heparin, when dosed appropriately with close therapeutic monitoring, has been shown to be safe for both mother and fetus. CONCLUSIONS: We favor the use of low-molecular-weight heparin with appropriate dosing and monitoring for the anticoagulation of pregnant women with MHVs. Data suggest that this approach minimizes the thrombotic risk associated with the valve while also providing safe and effective anticoagulation that can be easily managed in the peripartum period.
IMPORTANCE: Mechanical heart valves (MHVs) pose significant thrombogenic risks to pregnant women and their fetuses, yet the choice of anticoagulation in this clinical setting remains unclear. Various therapeutic strategies carry distinct risk profiles that must be considered when making the decision about optimal anticoagulation. OBJECTIVE: We sought to review existing data and offer recommendations for the anticoagulation of pregnant women with MHVs, as well as management of anticoagulation in the peripartum period. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We performed a literature review of studies examining outcomes in pregnant women receiving systemic anticoagulation for mechanical valves, and also reviewed data on the safety profiles of various anticoagulant strategies in the setting of pregnancy. RESULTS: Warfarin has been shown to increase rates of embryopathy and fetal demise, although it has traditionally been the favored anticoagulant in this setting. Low-molecular-weight heparin, when dosed appropriately with close therapeutic monitoring, has been shown to be safe for both mother and fetus. CONCLUSIONS: We favor the use of low-molecular-weight heparin with appropriate dosing and monitoring for the anticoagulation of pregnant women with MHVs. Data suggest that this approach minimizes the thrombotic risk associated with the valve while also providing safe and effective anticoagulation that can be easily managed in the peripartum period.
Authors: John W Eikelboom; Stuart J Connolly; Martina Brueckmann; Christopher B Granger; Arie P Kappetein; Michael J Mack; Jon Blatchford; Kevin Devenny; Jeffrey Friedman; Kelly Guiver; Ruth Harper; Yasser Khder; Maximilian T Lobmeyer; Hugo Maas; Jens-Uwe Voigt; Maarten L Simoons; Frans Van de Werf Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-08-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Abhay F Srinivasan; Lawrence Rice; John R Bartholomew; Chandhiran Rangaswamy; Lucy La Perna; James E Thompson; Scott Murphy; Kelty R Baker Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2004-01-12
Authors: Zachary L Steinberg; Clara P Dominguez-Islas; Catherine M Otto; Karen K Stout; Eric V Krieger Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 24.094