Literature DB >> 32232167

Temporal trends in the accuracy of hospital diagnostic coding for identifying acute stroke: A population-based study.

Linxin Li1, Lucy E Binney1, Ramon Luengo-Fernandez1, Louise E Silver1, Peter M Rothwell1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Administrative hospital diagnostic coding data are increasingly being used in identifying incident and prevalent stroke cases, for outcome audit and for 'big data' research. Validity of administrative coding has varied in previous studies, but little is known about the temporal trends of coding accuracy, which could bias analyses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using all incident and recurrent strokes in a population-based cohort (Oxford Vascular Study/OXVASC) with multiple sources of ascertainment as the reference, we determined the temporal trends in sensitivity and positive predictive value of hospital diagnostic codes for identifying acute stroke from 2002 to 2017.
RESULTS: Of 1883 hospitalised strokes, 1341 (71.2%) were correctly identified by coding. Sensitivity of coding improved over time for all strokes (ptrend = 0.005) and for incident cases (ptrend = 0.002). Of 1995 apparent stroke admissions identified by International Classification of Disease-10 stroke codes (I60-I68), 1588 (79.6%) used the stroke-specific codes (I60-I61/I63-I64). Positive predictive value was higher with the use of specific codes (83.2% vs. 69.2% for all codes) and highest if combined with the first admission only (88.5%), particularly during more recent time periods (2014-2017 = 90.3%). Of 2254 OXVASC incident strokes, 833 (37.0%) were not hospitalised. Sensitivity of coding increased over time for non-disabling stroke (ptrend = 0.001), but not for disabling/fatal stroke (ptrend = 0.40).
CONCLUSIONS: Although accuracy of hospital diagnostic coding for identifying acute strokes improved over the last 15 years, residual insensitivity supports linkage to other sources in large epidemiological studies. Moreover, differences in the time trends of coding sensitivity in relation to stroke severity might bias studies of trends in stroke outcome if only administrative coding is used. © European Stroke Organisation 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic coding; epidemiology; population-based cohort; positive predictive value; sensitivity; stroke; trend

Year:  2019        PMID: 32232167      PMCID: PMC7092737          DOI: 10.1177/2396987319881017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Stroke J        ISSN: 2396-9873


  26 in total

1.  Stroke tracked by administrative coding data: is it fair?

Authors:  Simona Sacco; Francesca Pistoia; Antonio Carolei
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Why are patients with acute stroke admitted to hospital?

Authors:  J Bamford; P Sandercock; C Warlow; M Gray
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-05-24

3.  Comparison of the validity of stroke diagnoses in a medical quality register and an administrative health register.

Authors:  Torunn Varmdal; Inger Johanne Bakken; Imre Janszky; Torgeir Wethal; Hanne Ellekjær; Gitta Rohweder; Hild Fjærtoft; Marta Ebbing; Kaare Harald Bønaa
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Population-based study of event-rate, incidence, case fatality, and mortality for all acute vascular events in all arterial territories (Oxford Vascular Study).

Authors:  P M Rothwell; A J Coull; L E Silver; J F Fairhead; M F Giles; C E Lovelock; J N E Redgrave; L M Bull; S J V Welch; F C Cuthbertson; L E Binney; S A Gutnikov; P Anslow; A P Banning; D Mant; Z Mehta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Validity of Diagnostic Codes for Acute Stroke in Administrative Databases: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Natalie McCormick; Vidula Bhole; Diane Lacaille; J Antonio Avina-Zubieta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sensitivity of Administrative Coding in Identifying Inpatient Acute Strokes Complicating Procedures or Other Diseases in UK Hospitals.

Authors:  Linxin Li; Lucy E Binney; Samantha Carter; Sergei A Gutnikov; Sally Beebe; Karen Bowsher-Brown; Louise E Silver; Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Feasibility, safety and cost of outpatient management of acute minor ischaemic stroke: a population-based study.

Authors:  Nicola L M Paul; Silvia Koton; Michela Simoni; Olivia C Geraghty; Ramon Luengo-Fernandez; Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Accuracy of death certification and hospital record linkage for identification of incident stroke.

Authors:  Shubhada Sinha; Phyo K Myint; Robert N Luben; Kay-Tee Khaw
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Validation of Stroke and Thrombolytic Therapy in Korean National Health Insurance Claim Data.

Authors:  Tai Hwan Park; Jay Chol Choi
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.077

10.  Incidence, outcome, risk factors, and long-term prognosis of cryptogenic transient ischaemic attack and ischaemic stroke: a population-based study.

Authors:  Linxin Li; Gabriel S Yiin; Olivia C Geraghty; Ursula G Schulz; Wilhelm Kuker; Ziyah Mehta; Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 59.935

View more
  8 in total

1.  Association of Younger vs Older Ages With Changes in Incidence of Stroke and Other Vascular Events, 2002-2018.

Authors:  Linxin Li; Catherine A Scott; Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 157.335

2.  Traumatic Brain Injury and Risk of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias in the Population.

Authors:  Michelle M Mielke; Jeanine E Ransom; Jay Mandrekar; Pierpaolo Turcano; Rodolfo Savica; Allen W Brown
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 4.160

3.  The Validity of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Diagnoses in the Danish Patient Registry and the Danish Stroke Registry.

Authors:  Stine Munk Hald; Christine Kring Sloth; Mikkel Agger; Maria Therese Schelde-Olesen; Miriam Højholt; Mette Hasle; Helle Bogetofte; Ida Olesrud; Stefanie Binzer; Charlotte Madsen; Willy Krone; Luis Alberto García Rodríguez; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Jesper Hallas; David Gaist
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.790

4.  The stroke mothership model survived during COVID-19 era: an observational single-center study in Emilia-Romagna, Italy.

Authors:  Andrea Zini; Michele Romoli; Mauro Gentile; Ludovica Migliaccio; Cosimo Picoco; Oscar Dell'Arciprete; Luigi Simonetti; Federica Naldi; Laura Piccolo; Giovanni Gordini; Francesco Tagliatela; Vincenzo Bua; Luigi Cirillo; Ciro Princiotta; Carlo Coniglio; Carlo Descovich; Pietro Cortelli
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Comparison of the Accuracy and Completeness of Records of Serious Vascular Events in Routinely Collected Data vs Clinical Trial-Adjudicated Direct Follow-up Data in the UK: Secondary Analysis of the ASCEND Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Charlie Harper; Marion Mafham; William Herrington; Natalie Staplin; William Stevens; Karl Wallendszus; Richard Haynes; Martin J Landray; Sarah Parish; Louise Bowman; Jane Armitage
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-12-01

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of major stroke types in Chinese adults: A clinical adjudication study involving 40,000 stroke cases.

Authors:  Iain Turnbull; Robert Clarke; Neil Wright; Yu Guo; Christina Kartsonaki; Pei Pei; Alex Hacker; Canqing Yu; Simon Gilbert; Ling Yang; Jinyi Zhou; Sam Sansome; Jun Lv; Liming Li; Zhengming Chen; Yiping Chen
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2022-03-05

7.  Administrative data for observational research in multiple sclerosis: Opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Ruth Ann Marrie; Kyla McKay
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 6.312

8.  Validation of a stroke model in rat compatible with rt-PA-induced thrombolysis: new hope for successful translation to the clinic.

Authors:  Cyrille Orset; Saema Ansar; Kajsa Arkelius; Denis Vivien
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.